FabDigitFabDigit

Copper Alloy CC490K vs CC766S

Copper Alloy · grade comparison

Copper Alloy CC490K and CC766S are both copper alloy grades. CC766S is the stronger of the two: yield strength 155 MPa (22.5 ksi) against 100 MPa (14.5 ksi) for CC490K, about 55% more; tensile strength follows at 400 MPa (58 ksi) vs 215 MPa (31.2 ksi). CC766S is harder — 95 HB against 65 HB for CC490K — which matters for wear surfaces and threads. CC766S is lighter (8.35 g/cm³ vs 8.7 g/cm³ for CC490K) and CC766S is stiffer (95 GPa vs 90 GPa). On the shop floor, CC490K machines more easily (very good vs fair), CC766S welds better (fair vs poor), and CC766S forms better (poor vs not recommended).

CC490KChoose it when the part is machined in volume.

CC766SChoose it when strength drives the design, or when surface hardness matters.

CC490K vs CC766S: properties

CC490KCC766S

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

90 GPa13.1 Msi
95 GPa13.8 Msi

Shear Modulus

36 GPa5.2 Msi
37 GPa5.4 Msi

Bulk Modulus

105 GPa15.2 Msi
115 GPa16.7 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

215 MPa31.2 ksi
400 MPa58 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

100 MPa14.5 ksi
155 MPa22.5 ksi

Shear Strength

160 MPa23.2 ksi
275 MPa39.9 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

75 MPa10.9 ksi
115 MPa16.7 ksi

Hardness, Brinell

65 HB
95 HB

Hardness, Rockwell B

25 HRB
52 HRB

Hardness, Vickers

68 HV
100 HV

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

—
35 MPa·√m31.9 ksi·√in

Same in both: Poisson's Ratio 0.34 · Elongation at Break 20% · Reduction in Area 20% · Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT) 25 J18.4 ft·lbf

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

8.7 g/cm³0.31 lb/in³
8.35 g/cm³0.3 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

900°C1,652 °F
885°C1,625 °F

Liquidus Temperature

1,000°C1,832 °F
905°C1,661 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

78 W/m·K45.1 BTU/hr·ft·°F
102 W/m·K58.9 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

377 J/kg·K0.09 BTU/lb·°F
380 J/kg·K0.09 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

18.5 µm/m·K10.3 µin/in·°F
20.5 µm/m·K11.4 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

205 J/g88.1 BTU/lb
175 J/g75.2 BTU/lb

Same in both: Max Service Temperature (continuous) 200°C392 °F · Min Service Temperature -100°C-148 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

15 % IACS
22 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

1.15×10⁻⁷ Ω·m4.53 µΩ·in
7.8×10⁻⁸ Ω·m3.07 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

70 / 100
56 / 100

Same in both: Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE) -0.25 V

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

80 / 100
45 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

80%
45%

Weldability

25 / 100
35 / 100

Formability (cold)

10 / 100
30 / 100

Castability

85 / 100
75 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

75 / 100
45 / 100

Polishability

60 / 100
70 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Water

260 L/kg31.2 gal/lb
250 L/kg30 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

85%
70%

Same in both: Embodied Energy (primary production) 55 MJ/kg23,646 BTU/lb · Embodied Carbon (primary production) 3.6 kg CO₂/kg

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

25 kN·m/kg
48 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

10.3 MN·m/kg
11.4 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

56 kJ/m³
126 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

23.8 mm²/s
32.1 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

10
21

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every copper alloy grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

501002005001,0007.588.599.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleCC490KCC766S

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityCC490KCC766S
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$$ High$$$ Premium
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

Both take the same 4 finishes: Copper Plating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Gold Plating, Silver Plating.

CC490K vs CC766S — frequently asked

Is CC766S stronger than CC490K?

Yes. CC766S has a typical yield strength of 155 MPa (22.5 ksi) against 100 MPa (14.5 ksi) for CC490K — about 55% more. Tensile strength is 400 MPa (58 ksi) vs 215 MPa (31.2 ksi).

Which is cheaper, CC490K or CC766S?

CC766S is the lower-cost material: it sits in the premium tier ($$$) while CC490K is high ($$$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, CC490K or CC766S?

CC490K. Its machinability rates very good (80/100) against fair (45/100) for CC766S; for welding the order is CC766S first (fair, 35/100) then CC490K (poor, 25/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in CC490K and CC766S side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.