FabDigitFabDigit

Copper Alloy CC490K vs CC755S

Copper Alloy · grade comparison

Copper Alloy CC490K and CC755S are both copper alloy grades. CC755S is the stronger of the two: yield strength 150 MPa (21.8 ksi) against 100 MPa (14.5 ksi) for CC490K, about 50% more; tensile strength follows at 370 MPa (53.7 ksi) vs 215 MPa (31.2 ksi). CC755S is harder — 95 HB against 65 HB for CC490K — which matters for wear surfaces and threads. CC755S is lighter (8.3 g/cm³ vs 8.7 g/cm³ for CC490K) and CC755S is stiffer (95 GPa vs 90 GPa). On the shop floor, CC755S sits in a lower cost tier (premium, $$$) than CC490K (high, $$$$).

CC755SChoose it when strength drives the design, or when surface hardness matters.

CC490K vs CC755S: properties

CC490KCC755S

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

90 GPa13.1 Msi
95 GPa13.8 Msi

Bulk Modulus

105 GPa15.2 Msi
115 GPa16.7 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

215 MPa31.2 ksi
370 MPa53.7 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

100 MPa14.5 ksi
150 MPa21.8 ksi

Elongation at Break

20%
22%

Reduction in Area

20%
22%

Shear Strength

160 MPa23.2 ksi
250 MPa36.3 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

75 MPa10.9 ksi
105 MPa15.2 ksi

Hardness, Brinell

65 HB
95 HB

Hardness, Rockwell B

25 HRB
55 HRB

Hardness, Vickers

68 HV
100 HV

Compressive Strength

—
340 MPa49.3 ksi

Same in both: Shear Modulus 36 GPa5.2 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.34 · Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT) 25 J18.4 ft·lbf

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

8.7 g/cm³0.31 lb/in³
8.3 g/cm³0.3 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

900°C1,652 °F
880°C1,616 °F

Liquidus Temperature

1,000°C1,832 °F
900°C1,652 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

78 W/m·K45.1 BTU/hr·ft·°F
110 W/m·K63.6 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

377 J/kg·K0.09 BTU/lb·°F
380 J/kg·K0.09 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

18.5 µm/m·K10.3 µin/in·°F
21 µm/m·K11.7 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

205 J/g88.1 BTU/lb
165 J/g70.9 BTU/lb

Same in both: Max Service Temperature (continuous) 200°C392 °F · Min Service Temperature -100°C-148 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

15 % IACS
24 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

1.15×10⁻⁷ Ω·m4.53 µΩ·in
7.2×10⁻⁸ Ω·m2.83 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.25 V
-0.26 V

Corrosion Resistance

70 / 100
52 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

80 / 100
78 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

80%
75%

Formability (cold)

10 / 100
18 / 100

Castability

85 / 100
88 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

75 / 100
80 / 100

Polishability

60 / 100
78 / 100

Same in both: Weldability 25 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

55 MJ/kg23,646 BTU/lb
50 MJ/kg21,496 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

3.6 kg CO₂/kg
3.1 kg CO₂/kg

Typical Recycled Content

85%
75%

Same in both: Embodied Water 260 L/kg31.2 gal/lb

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

25 kN·m/kg
45 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

10.3 MN·m/kg
11.4 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

56 kJ/m³
118 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

23.8 mm²/s
34.9 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

10
20

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every copper alloy grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

501002005001,0007.588.599.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleCC490KCC755S

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityCC490KCC755S
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$$ High$$$ Premium
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

Both take the same 4 finishes: Copper Plating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Gold Plating, Silver Plating.

CC490K vs CC755S — frequently asked

Is CC755S stronger than CC490K?

Yes. CC755S has a typical yield strength of 150 MPa (21.8 ksi) against 100 MPa (14.5 ksi) for CC490K — about 50% more. Tensile strength is 370 MPa (53.7 ksi) vs 215 MPa (31.2 ksi).

Which is cheaper, CC490K or CC755S?

CC755S is the lower-cost material: it sits in the premium tier ($$$) while CC490K is high ($$$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

When should I choose CC490K over CC755S?

Pick CC755S when strength drives the design, or when surface hardness matters.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in CC490K and CC755S side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.