FabDigitFabDigit

Copper Alloy CC490K vs CC752S

Copper Alloy · grade comparison

Copper Alloy CC490K and CC752S are both copper alloy grades. CC752S is the stronger of the two: yield strength 110 MPa (16 ksi) against 100 MPa (14.5 ksi) for CC490K, about 10% more; tensile strength follows at 280 MPa (40.6 ksi) vs 215 MPa (31.2 ksi). In exchange, CC490K is the more ductile: elongation 20% versus 15% for CC752S, and CC752S is harder (75 HB vs 65 HB). CC752S is stiffer (95 GPa vs 90 GPa) and CC752S conducts heat better (115 W/m·K vs 78 W/m·K).

CC490KChoose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

CC752SChoose it when strength drives the design.

CC490K vs CC752S: properties

CC490KCC752S

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

90 GPa13.1 Msi
95 GPa13.8 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

215 MPa31.2 ksi
280 MPa40.6 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

100 MPa14.5 ksi
110 MPa16 ksi

Elongation at Break

20%
15%

Reduction in Area

20%
—

Shear Strength

160 MPa23.2 ksi
200 MPa29 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

75 MPa10.9 ksi
90 MPa13.1 ksi

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

25 J18.4 ft·lbf
12 J8.9 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

65 HB
75 HB

Hardness, Rockwell B

25 HRB
—

Hardness, Vickers

68 HV
—

Same in both: Shear Modulus 36 GPa5.2 Msi · Bulk Modulus 105 GPa15.2 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.34

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

8.7 g/cm³0.31 lb/in³
8.45 g/cm³0.31 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

900°C1,652 °F
880°C1,616 °F

Liquidus Temperature

1,000°C1,832 °F
905°C1,661 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

78 W/m·K45.1 BTU/hr·ft·°F
115 W/m·K66.4 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

377 J/kg·K0.09 BTU/lb·°F
380 J/kg·K0.09 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

18.5 µm/m·K10.3 µin/in·°F
20.5 µm/m·K11.4 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

205 J/g88.1 BTU/lb
170 J/g73.1 BTU/lb

Same in both: Max Service Temperature (continuous) 200°C392 °F · Min Service Temperature -100°C-148 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

15 % IACS
24 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

1.15×10⁻⁷ Ω·m4.53 µΩ·in
7.2×10⁻⁸ Ω·m2.83 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.25 V
-0.28 V

Corrosion Resistance

70 / 100
57 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

80%
—

Formability (cold)

10 / 100
20 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

75 / 100
80 / 100

Polishability

60 / 100
75 / 100

Same in both: Machinability 80 / 100 · Weldability 25 / 100 · Castability 85 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Water

260 L/kg31.2 gal/lb
350 L/kg41.9 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

85%
80%

Same in both: Embodied Energy (primary production) 55 MJ/kg23,646 BTU/lb · Embodied Carbon (primary production) 3.6 kg CO₂/kg

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

25 kN·m/kg
33 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

10.3 MN·m/kg
11.2 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

56 kJ/m³
64 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

23.8 mm²/s
35.8 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

10
17

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every copper alloy grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

501002005001,0007.588.599.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleCC490KCC752S

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityCC490KCC752S
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$$ High$$$$ High
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

Both take the same 4 finishes: Copper Plating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Gold Plating, Silver Plating.

CC490K vs CC752S — frequently asked

Is CC752S stronger than CC490K?

Yes. CC752S has a typical yield strength of 110 MPa (16 ksi) against 100 MPa (14.5 ksi) for CC490K — about 10% more. Tensile strength is 280 MPa (40.6 ksi) vs 215 MPa (31.2 ksi).

Which is cheaper, CC490K or CC752S?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$$, high); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

When should I choose CC490K over CC752S?

Pick CC490K when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded. Pick CC752S when strength drives the design.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in CC490K and CC752S side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.