FabDigitFabDigit

Copper Alloy C99400 vs CC490K

Copper Alloy · grade comparison

Copper Alloy C99400 and CC490K are both copper alloy grades. C99400 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 205 MPa (29.7 ksi) against 100 MPa (14.5 ksi) for CC490K, about 105% more; tensile strength follows at 415 MPa (60.2 ksi) vs 215 MPa (31.2 ksi). C99400 is harder — 125 HB against 65 HB for CC490K — which matters for wear surfaces and threads. C99400 is lighter (8 g/cm³ vs 8.7 g/cm³ for CC490K) and C99400 is stiffer (117 GPa vs 90 GPa). On the shop floor, CC490K machines more easily (very good vs good) and C99400 welds better (fair vs poor).

C99400Choose it when strength drives the design, or when surface hardness matters.

CC490KChoose it when the part is machined in volume.

C99400 vs CC490K: properties

C99400CC490K

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

117 GPa17 Msi
90 GPa13.1 Msi

Shear Modulus

44 GPa6.4 Msi
36 GPa5.2 Msi

Bulk Modulus

120 GPa17.4 Msi
105 GPa15.2 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

415 MPa60.2 ksi
215 MPa31.2 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

205 MPa29.7 ksi
100 MPa14.5 ksi

Compressive Strength

430 MPa62.4 ksi
—

Shear Strength

275 MPa39.9 ksi
160 MPa23.2 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

130 MPa18.9 ksi
75 MPa10.9 ksi

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

20 J14.8 ft·lbf
25 J18.4 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

125 HB
65 HB

Hardness, Rockwell B

72 HRB
25 HRB

Reduction in Area

—
20%

Hardness, Vickers

—
68 HV

Same in both: Poisson's Ratio 0.34 · Elongation at Break 20%

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

8 g/cm³0.29 lb/in³
8.7 g/cm³0.31 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

996°C1,825 °F
900°C1,652 °F

Liquidus Temperature

1,024°C1,875 °F
1,000°C1,832 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

42 W/m·K24.3 BTU/hr·ft·°F
78 W/m·K45.1 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

376 J/kg·K0.09 BTU/lb·°F
377 J/kg·K0.09 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

16.2 µm/m·K9 µin/in·°F
18.5 µm/m·K10.3 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

250°C482 °F
200°C392 °F

Min Service Temperature

-196°C-321 °F
-100°C-148 °F

Same in both: Latent Heat of Fusion 205 J/g88.1 BTU/lb

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

8 % IACS
15 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

2.16×10⁻⁷ Ω·m8.5 µΩ·in
1.15×10⁻⁷ Ω·m4.53 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.28 V
-0.25 V

Corrosion Resistance

72 / 100
70 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

62 / 100
80 / 100

Weldability

40 / 100
25 / 100

Castability

80 / 100
85 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

40 / 100
75 / 100

Polishability

70 / 100
60 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

—
80%

Same in both: Formability (cold) 10 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

48 MJ/kg20,636 BTU/lb
55 MJ/kg23,646 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

3.4 kg CO₂/kg
3.6 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

280 L/kg33.6 gal/lb
260 L/kg31.2 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

70%
85%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

52 kN·m/kg
25 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

14.6 MN·m/kg
10.3 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

180 kJ/m³
56 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

14 mm²/s
23.8 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

9
10

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every copper alloy grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

501002005001,0007.588.599.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleCC490KC99400

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityC99400CC490K
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$$ High$$$$ High
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

Both take the same 4 finishes: Copper Plating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Gold Plating, Silver Plating.

C99400 vs CC490K — frequently asked

Is C99400 stronger than CC490K?

Yes. C99400 has a typical yield strength of 205 MPa (29.7 ksi) against 100 MPa (14.5 ksi) for CC490K — about 105% more. Tensile strength is 415 MPa (60.2 ksi) vs 215 MPa (31.2 ksi).

Which is cheaper, C99400 or CC490K?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$$, high); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, C99400 or CC490K?

CC490K. Its machinability rates very good (80/100) against good (62/100) for C99400; for welding the order is C99400 first (fair, 40/100) then CC490K (poor, 25/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in C99400 and CC490K side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.