FabDigitFabDigit

Copper Alloy C97600 vs CC380H

Copper Alloy · grade comparison

Copper Alloy C97600 and CC380H are both copper alloy grades. C97600 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 165 MPa (23.9 ksi) against 140 MPa (20.3 ksi) for CC380H, about 18% more. In exchange, CC380H is the more ductile: elongation 25% versus 20% for C97600. C97600 is stiffer (138 GPa vs 124 GPa) and CC380H runs hotter in service (300°C vs 260°C continuous). On the shop floor, C97600 machines more easily (very good vs poor) and CC380H welds better (very good vs poor).

C97600Choose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is machined in volume.

CC380HChoose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part sees heat.

C97600 vs CC380H: properties

C97600CC380H

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

138 GPa20 Msi
124 GPa18 Msi

Shear Modulus

52 GPa7.5 Msi
46 GPa6.7 Msi

Bulk Modulus

125 GPa18.1 Msi
128 GPa18.6 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

310 MPa45 ksi
300 MPa43.5 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

165 MPa23.9 ksi
140 MPa20.3 ksi

Elongation at Break

20%
25%

Compressive Strength

330 MPa47.9 ksi
—

Shear Strength

240 MPa34.8 ksi
195 MPa28.3 ksi

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

20 J14.8 ft·lbf
50 J36.9 ft·lbf

Hardness, Rockwell B

42 HRB
40 HRB

Reduction in Area

—
25%

Hardness, Vickers

—
84 HV

Same in both: Poisson's Ratio 0.33 · Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit) 105 MPa15.2 ksi · Hardness, Brinell 80 HB

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

8.86 g/cm³0.32 lb/in³
8.9 g/cm³0.32 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

1,108°C2,026 °F
1,100°C2,012 °F

Liquidus Temperature

1,143°C2,089 °F
1,145°C2,093 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

26 W/m·K15 BTU/hr·ft·°F
42 W/m·K24.3 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

16.2 µm/m·K9 µin/in·°F
16.5 µm/m·K9.2 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

260°C500 °F
300°C572 °F

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 377 J/kg·K0.09 BTU/lb·°F · Latent Heat of Fusion 200 J/g86 BTU/lb · Min Service Temperature -196°C-321 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

4.5 % IACS
10 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

3.87×10⁻⁷ Ω·m15.2 µΩ·in
1.7×10⁻⁷ Ω·m6.69 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.25 V
-0.28 V

Corrosion Resistance

68 / 100
82 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

70 / 100
28 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

90%
20%

Weldability

25 / 100
80 / 100

Castability

70 / 100
60 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

80 / 100
70 / 100

Polishability

80 / 100
70 / 100

Same in both: Formability (cold) 15 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

78 MJ/kg33,534 BTU/lb
70 MJ/kg30,095 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

5.5 kg CO₂/kg
5.2 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

320 L/kg38.3 gal/lb
300 L/kg35.9 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

45%
40%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

35 kN·m/kg
34 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

15.6 MN·m/kg
13.9 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

99 kJ/m³
79 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

7.8 mm²/s
12.5 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

4
6

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every copper alloy grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

501002005001,0007.588.599.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleCC380HC97600

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityC97600CC380H
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$$ High$$$$ High
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

Both take the same 4 finishes: Copper Plating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Gold Plating, Silver Plating.

C97600 vs CC380H — frequently asked

Is C97600 stronger than CC380H?

Yes. C97600 has a typical yield strength of 165 MPa (23.9 ksi) against 140 MPa (20.3 ksi) for CC380H — about 18% more. Tensile strength is 310 MPa (45 ksi) vs 300 MPa (43.5 ksi).

Which is cheaper, C97600 or CC380H?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$$, high); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, C97600 or CC380H?

C97600. Its machinability rates very good (70/100) against poor (28/100) for CC380H; for welding the order is CC380H first (very good, 80/100) then C97600 (poor, 25/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in C97600 and CC380H side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.