Copper Alloy C97300 vs CC382H
Copper Alloy · grade comparison
Copper Alloy C97300 and CC382H are both copper alloy grades. CC382H is the stronger of the two: yield strength 275 MPa (39.9 ksi) against 117 MPa (17 ksi) for C97300, about 135% more; tensile strength follows at 470 MPa (68.2 ksi) vs 240 MPa (34.8 ksi). CC382H is the more ductile: elongation 20% versus 18% for C97300, and CC382H is harder (130 HB vs 55 HB). CC382H is stiffer (150 GPa vs 103 GPa) and CC382H runs hotter in service (300°C vs 200°C continuous). On the shop floor, C97300 machines more easily (very good vs poor) and CC382H welds better (good vs poor).
C97300Choose it when the part is machined in volume.
CC382HChoose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.
C97300 vs CC382H: propertiesHow to read these bars
- One bar per material. A full bar is the highest value among all copper alloy grades in the FabDigit library; each bar is drawn as a share of that.
- The better value (by the usual engineering direction) is in bold. Rows with no direction — density, thermal conductivity — have no bold.
- Values are typical room-temperature figures for the condition named on each card.
- Confirm against the certified mill or resin datasheet before design release.
How to read these bars
- One bar per material. A full bar is the highest value among all copper alloy grades in the FabDigit library; each bar is drawn as a share of that.
- The better value (by the usual engineering direction) is in bold. Rows with no direction — density, thermal conductivity — have no bold.
- Values are typical room-temperature figures for the condition named on each card.
- Confirm against the certified mill or resin datasheet before design release.
Mechanical
Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.
Elastic (Young's) Modulus
Shear Modulus
Bulk Modulus
Poisson's Ratio
Tensile Strength (Ultimate)
Yield Strength (0.2% offset)
Elongation at Break
Reduction in Area
Shear Strength
Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)
Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)
Hardness, Brinell
Hardness, Vickers
Hardness, Rockwell B
Physical
Density and transition temperatures.
Density
Melting Point (Solidus)
Liquidus Temperature
Thermal
How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.
Thermal Conductivity
Specific Heat Capacity
Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)
Latent Heat of Fusion
Max Service Temperature (continuous)
Min Service Temperature
Electrical
Conductivity and insulation.
Electrical Conductivity
Electrical Resistivity
Chemical & Environmental
Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).
Corrosion Resistance
Same in both: Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE) -0.25 V
Manufacturability
FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.
Machinability
Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)
Weldability
Formability (cold)
Castability
Brazeability / Solderability
Polishability
Sustainability
Primary-production footprint per kilogram.
Embodied Energy (primary production)
Embodied Carbon (primary production)
Embodied Water
Typical Recycled Content
Common Calculations
Ratios derived from the values above.
Specific Strength (UTS / density)
Specific Stiffness (E / density)
Modulus of Resilience
Thermal Diffusivity
Thermal Shock Resistance Index
Strength versus weight
Yield strength against density for every copper alloy grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.
Manufacturing and finishing
| Capability | C97300 | CC382H |
|---|---|---|
| Default condition | — | — |
| Relative cost | $$$$ High | $$$$ High |
| Min. machined wall | — | — |
| Best machined surface | — | — |
Both take the same 4 finishes: Copper Plating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Gold Plating, Silver Plating.
C97300 vs CC382H — frequently asked
Is CC382H stronger than C97300?
Yes. CC382H has a typical yield strength of 275 MPa (39.9 ksi) against 117 MPa (17 ksi) for C97300 — about 135% more. Tensile strength is 470 MPa (68.2 ksi) vs 240 MPa (34.8 ksi).
Which is cheaper, C97300 or CC382H?
Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$$, high); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.
Which is easier to machine, C97300 or CC382H?
C97300. Its machinability rates very good (78/100) against poor (22/100) for CC382H; for welding the order is CC382H first (good, 65/100) then C97300 (poor, 15/100).
Ready to make it?
Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in C97300 and CC382H side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.
Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.