Copper Alloy C96200 vs CC382H
Copper Alloy · grade comparison
Copper Alloy C96200 and CC382H are both copper alloy grades. CC382H is the stronger of the two: yield strength 275 MPa (39.9 ksi) against 179 MPa (26 ksi) for C96200, about 54% more; tensile strength follows at 470 MPa (68.2 ksi) vs 317 MPa (46 ksi). In exchange, C96200 is the more ductile: elongation 25% versus 20% for CC382H, and CC382H is harder (130 HB vs 80 HB). CC382H is stiffer (150 GPa vs 124 GPa) and C96200 conducts heat better (45 W/m·K vs 26 W/m·K). On the shop floor, C96200 welds better (very good vs good).
C96200Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when it will be welded.
CC382HChoose it when strength drives the design.
C96200 vs CC382H: propertiesHow to read these bars
- One bar per material. A full bar is the highest value among all copper alloy grades in the FabDigit library; each bar is drawn as a share of that.
- The better value (by the usual engineering direction) is in bold. Rows with no direction — density, thermal conductivity — have no bold.
- Values are typical room-temperature figures for the condition named on each card.
- Confirm against the certified mill or resin datasheet before design release.
How to read these bars
- One bar per material. A full bar is the highest value among all copper alloy grades in the FabDigit library; each bar is drawn as a share of that.
- The better value (by the usual engineering direction) is in bold. Rows with no direction — density, thermal conductivity — have no bold.
- Values are typical room-temperature figures for the condition named on each card.
- Confirm against the certified mill or resin datasheet before design release.
Mechanical
Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.
Elastic (Young's) Modulus
Shear Modulus
Bulk Modulus
Poisson's Ratio
Tensile Strength (Ultimate)
Yield Strength (0.2% offset)
Elongation at Break
Shear Strength
Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)
Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)
Hardness, Brinell
Hardness, Rockwell B
Hardness, Vickers
Same in both: Reduction in Area 20%
Physical
Density and transition temperatures.
Density
Melting Point (Solidus)
Liquidus Temperature
Thermal
How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.
Thermal Conductivity
Specific Heat Capacity
Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)
Latent Heat of Fusion
Max Service Temperature (continuous)
Min Service Temperature
Electrical
Conductivity and insulation.
Electrical Conductivity
Electrical Resistivity
Chemical & Environmental
Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).
Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)
Corrosion Resistance
Manufacturability
FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.
Machinability
Weldability
Castability
Brazeability / Solderability
Polishability
Formability (cold)
Same in both: Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %) 20%
Sustainability
Primary-production footprint per kilogram.
Embodied Energy (primary production)
Embodied Carbon (primary production)
Embodied Water
Typical Recycled Content
Common Calculations
Ratios derived from the values above.
Specific Strength (UTS / density)
Specific Stiffness (E / density)
Modulus of Resilience
Thermal Diffusivity
Thermal Shock Resistance Index
Strength versus weight
Yield strength against density for every copper alloy grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.
Manufacturing and finishing
| Capability | C96200 | CC382H |
|---|---|---|
| Default condition | — | — |
| Relative cost | $$$$ High | $$$$ High |
| Min. machined wall | — | — |
| Best machined surface | — | — |
Both take the same 4 finishes: Copper Plating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Gold Plating, Silver Plating.
C96200 vs CC382H — frequently asked
Is CC382H stronger than C96200?
Yes. CC382H has a typical yield strength of 275 MPa (39.9 ksi) against 179 MPa (26 ksi) for C96200 — about 54% more. Tensile strength is 470 MPa (68.2 ksi) vs 317 MPa (46 ksi).
Which is cheaper, C96200 or CC382H?
Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$$, high); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.
Which is easier to machine, C96200 or CC382H?
C96200, by a small margin. Both rate poor for machinability — 30/100 against 22/100 for CC382H; for welding the order is C96200 first (very good, 75/100) then CC382H (good, 65/100).
Ready to make it?
Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in C96200 and CC382H side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.
Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.