FabDigitFabDigit

Copper Alloy C85900 vs C86300

Copper Alloy · grade comparison

Copper Alloy C85900 and C86300 are both copper alloy grades. C86300 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 470 MPa (68.2 ksi) against 115 MPa (16.7 ksi) for C85900, about 4.1 times as much; tensile strength follows at 820 MPa (119 ksi) vs 290 MPa (42.1 ksi). In exchange, C85900 is the more ductile: elongation 25% versus 15% for C86300, and C86300 is harder (225 HB vs 60 HB). C86300 is lighter (7.65 g/cm³ vs 8.4 g/cm³ for C85900) and C86300 is stiffer (103 GPa vs 97 GPa). On the shop floor, C85900 machines more easily (very good vs poor) and C85900 sits in a lower cost tier (premium, $$$) than C86300 (specialty, $$$$$).

C85900Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part is machined in volume.

C86300Choose it when strength drives the design, or when weight is the constraint.

C85900 vs C86300: properties

C85900C86300

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

97 GPa14.1 Msi
103 GPa14.9 Msi

Shear Modulus

37 GPa5.4 Msi
39 GPa5.7 Msi

Bulk Modulus

101 GPa14.6 Msi
107 GPa15.5 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

290 MPa42.1 ksi
820 MPa119 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

115 MPa16.7 ksi
470 MPa68.2 ksi

Elongation at Break

25%
15%

Shear Strength

205 MPa29.7 ksi
540 MPa78.3 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

90 MPa13.1 ksi
200 MPa29 ksi

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

25 J18.4 ft·lbf
20 J14.8 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

60 HB
225 HB

Hardness, Vickers

63 HV
—

Reduction in Area

—
18%

Compressive Strength

—
480 MPa69.6 ksi

Hardness, Rockwell B

—
96 HRB

Same in both: Poisson's Ratio 0.34

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

8.4 g/cm³0.3 lb/in³
7.65 g/cm³0.28 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

875°C1,607 °F
862°C1,584 °F

Liquidus Temperature

930°C1,706 °F
924°C1,695 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

85 W/m·K49.1 BTU/hr·ft·°F
36 W/m·K20.8 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

380 J/kg·K0.09 BTU/lb·°F
377 J/kg·K0.09 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

21 µm/m·K11.7 µin/in·°F
19.3 µm/m·K10.7 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

165 J/g70.9 BTU/lb
175 J/g75.2 BTU/lb

Same in both: Max Service Temperature (continuous) 200°C392 °F · Min Service Temperature -100°C-148 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

26 % IACS
8 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

6.6×10⁻⁸ Ω·m2.6 µΩ·in
2.16×10⁻⁷ Ω·m8.5 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.25 V
-0.3 V

Same in both: Corrosion Resistance 45 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

80 / 100
25 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

80%
25%

Formability (cold)

10 / 100
15 / 100

Castability

85 / 100
80 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

85 / 100
25 / 100

Polishability

70 / 100
60 / 100

Same in both: Weldability 30 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

45 MJ/kg19,347 BTU/lb
55 MJ/kg23,646 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

3.2 kg CO₂/kg
3.6 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

250 L/kg30 gal/lb
200 L/kg24 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

90%
70%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

35 kN·m/kg
107 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

11.5 MN·m/kg
13.5 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

68 kJ/m³
1,072 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

26.6 mm²/s
12.5 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

12
15

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every copper alloy grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

501002005001,0007.588.599.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleC86300C85900

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityC85900C86300
CNC machining—Yes
Default condition—As Cast
Relative cost$$$ Premium$$$$$ Specialty
Min. machined wall—0.8 mm
Best machined surface—Ra 1.6 µm
Chrome Plating—Yes
Electropolishing—Yes
Nickel Plating—Yes
Painting—Yes
Tin Plating—Yes

They share 4 finishes: Copper Plating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Gold Plating, Silver Plating.

C85900 vs C86300 — frequently asked

Is C86300 stronger than C85900?

Yes. C86300 has a typical yield strength of 470 MPa (68.2 ksi) against 115 MPa (16.7 ksi) for C85900 — about 4.1 times as much. Tensile strength is 820 MPa (119 ksi) vs 290 MPa (42.1 ksi).

Which is cheaper, C85900 or C86300?

C85900 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the premium tier ($$$) while C86300 is specialty ($$$$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, C85900 or C86300?

C85900. Its machinability rates very good (80/100) against poor (25/100) for C86300.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in C85900 and C86300 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.