FabDigitFabDigit

Copper Alloy C85800 vs CC490K

Copper Alloy · grade comparison

Copper Alloy C85800 and CC490K are both copper alloy grades. C85800 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 205 MPa (29.7 ksi) against 100 MPa (14.5 ksi) for CC490K, about 105% more; tensile strength follows at 379 MPa (55 ksi) vs 215 MPa (31.2 ksi). In exchange, CC490K is the more ductile: elongation 20% versus 15% for C85800, and CC490K is harder (65 HB vs 55 HB). C85800 is stiffer (103 GPa vs 90 GPa) and C85800 conducts electricity better (26 % IACS vs 15 % IACS). On the shop floor, C85800 sits in a lower cost tier (premium, $$$) than CC490K (high, $$$$).

C85800Choose it when strength drives the design, or when cost is the deciding factor.

CC490KChoose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

C85800 vs CC490K: properties

C85800CC490K

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

103 GPa14.9 Msi
90 GPa13.1 Msi

Shear Modulus

39 GPa5.7 Msi
36 GPa5.2 Msi

Bulk Modulus

107 GPa15.5 Msi
105 GPa15.2 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

379 MPa55 ksi
215 MPa31.2 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

205 MPa29.7 ksi
100 MPa14.5 ksi

Elongation at Break

15%
20%

Shear Strength

235 MPa34.1 ksi
160 MPa23.2 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

110 MPa16 ksi
75 MPa10.9 ksi

Hardness, Brinell

55 HB
65 HB

Reduction in Area

—
20%

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

—
25 J18.4 ft·lbf

Hardness, Vickers

—
68 HV

Same in both: Poisson's Ratio 0.34 · Hardness, Rockwell B 25 HRB

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

8.5 g/cm³0.31 lb/in³
8.7 g/cm³0.31 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

857°C1,575 °F
900°C1,652 °F

Liquidus Temperature

899°C1,650 °F
1,000°C1,832 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

84 W/m·K48.5 BTU/hr·ft·°F
78 W/m·K45.1 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

380 J/kg·K0.09 BTU/lb·°F
377 J/kg·K0.09 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

20.8 µm/m·K11.6 µin/in·°F
18.5 µm/m·K10.3 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

165 J/g70.9 BTU/lb
205 J/g88.1 BTU/lb

Same in both: Max Service Temperature (continuous) 200°C392 °F · Min Service Temperature -100°C-148 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

26 % IACS
15 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

6.6×10⁻⁸ Ω·m2.6 µΩ·in
1.15×10⁻⁷ Ω·m4.53 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.26 V
-0.25 V

Corrosion Resistance

45 / 100
70 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Weldability

20 / 100
25 / 100

Castability

92 / 100
85 / 100

Polishability

75 / 100
60 / 100

Same in both: Machinability 80 / 100 · Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %) 80% · Formability (cold) 10 / 100 · Brazeability / Solderability 75 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

40 MJ/kg17,197 BTU/lb
55 MJ/kg23,646 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

2.8 kg CO₂/kg
3.6 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

200 L/kg24 gal/lb
260 L/kg31.2 gal/lb

Same in both: Typical Recycled Content 85%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

45 kN·m/kg
25 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

12.1 MN·m/kg
10.3 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

204 kJ/m³
56 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

26 mm²/s
23.8 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

15
10

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every copper alloy grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

501002005001,0007.588.599.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleCC490KC85800

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityC85800CC490K
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$ Premium$$$$ High
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

Both take the same 4 finishes: Copper Plating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Gold Plating, Silver Plating.

C85800 vs CC490K — frequently asked

Is C85800 stronger than CC490K?

Yes. C85800 has a typical yield strength of 205 MPa (29.7 ksi) against 100 MPa (14.5 ksi) for CC490K — about 105% more. Tensile strength is 379 MPa (55 ksi) vs 215 MPa (31.2 ksi).

Which is cheaper, C85800 or CC490K?

C85800 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the premium tier ($$$) while CC490K is high ($$$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which welds better, C85800 or CC490K?

CC490K. Its weldability rates poor (25/100) against poor (20/100) for C85800.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in C85800 and CC490K side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.