FabDigitFabDigit

Copper Alloy C85500 vs CC490K

Copper Alloy · grade comparison

Copper Alloy C85500 and CC490K are both copper alloy grades. C85500 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 172 MPa (24.9 ksi) against 100 MPa (14.5 ksi) for CC490K, about 72% more; tensile strength follows at 414 MPa (60 ksi) vs 215 MPa (31.2 ksi). C85500 is the more ductile: elongation 35% versus 20% for CC490K, and C85500 is harder (75 HB vs 65 HB). C85500 is lighter (8.4 g/cm³ vs 8.7 g/cm³ for CC490K) and C85500 is stiffer (100 GPa vs 90 GPa). On the shop floor, CC490K machines more easily (80 vs 70 out of 100) and C85500 sits in a lower cost tier (premium, $$$) than CC490K (high, $$$$).

C85500Choose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

CC490KChoose it when the part is machined in volume.

C85500 vs CC490K: properties

C85500CC490K

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

100 GPa14.5 Msi
90 GPa13.1 Msi

Shear Modulus

37 GPa5.4 Msi
36 GPa5.2 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

414 MPa60 ksi
215 MPa31.2 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

172 MPa24.9 ksi
100 MPa14.5 ksi

Elongation at Break

35%
20%

Compressive Strength

250 MPa36.3 ksi
—

Shear Strength

275 MPa39.9 ksi
160 MPa23.2 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

110 MPa16 ksi
75 MPa10.9 ksi

Hardness, Brinell

75 HB
65 HB

Hardness, Rockwell B

40 HRB
25 HRB

Reduction in Area

—
20%

Hardness, Vickers

—
68 HV

Same in both: Bulk Modulus 105 GPa15.2 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.34 · Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT) 25 J18.4 ft·lbf

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

8.4 g/cm³0.3 lb/in³
8.7 g/cm³0.31 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

899°C1,650 °F
900°C1,652 °F

Liquidus Temperature

905°C1,661 °F
1,000°C1,832 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

123 W/m·K71.1 BTU/hr·ft·°F
78 W/m·K45.1 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

375 J/kg·K0.09 BTU/lb·°F
377 J/kg·K0.09 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

20.8 µm/m·K11.6 µin/in·°F
18.5 µm/m·K10.3 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

170 J/g73.1 BTU/lb
205 J/g88.1 BTU/lb

Same in both: Max Service Temperature (continuous) 200°C392 °F · Min Service Temperature -100°C-148 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

27 % IACS
15 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

6.4×10⁻⁸ Ω·m2.52 µΩ·in
1.15×10⁻⁷ Ω·m4.53 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.28 V
-0.25 V

Corrosion Resistance

52 / 100
70 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

70 / 100
80 / 100

Weldability

30 / 100
25 / 100

Castability

78 / 100
85 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

85 / 100
75 / 100

Polishability

78 / 100
60 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

—
80%

Formability (cold)

—
10 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

45 MJ/kg19,347 BTU/lb
55 MJ/kg23,646 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

3.2 kg CO₂/kg
3.6 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

250 L/kg30 gal/lb
260 L/kg31.2 gal/lb

Same in both: Typical Recycled Content 85%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

49 kN·m/kg
25 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

11.9 MN·m/kg
10.3 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

148 kJ/m³
56 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

39 mm²/s
23.8 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

24
10

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every copper alloy grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

501002005001,0007.588.599.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleCC490KC85500

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityC85500CC490K
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$ Premium$$$$ High
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

Both take the same 4 finishes: Copper Plating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Gold Plating, Silver Plating.

C85500 vs CC490K — frequently asked

Is C85500 stronger than CC490K?

Yes. C85500 has a typical yield strength of 172 MPa (24.9 ksi) against 100 MPa (14.5 ksi) for CC490K — about 72% more. Tensile strength is 414 MPa (60 ksi) vs 215 MPa (31.2 ksi).

Which is cheaper, C85500 or CC490K?

C85500 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the premium tier ($$$) while CC490K is high ($$$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, C85500 or CC490K?

CC490K, by a small margin. Both rate very good for machinability — 80/100 against 70/100 for C85500; for welding the order is C85500 first (poor, 30/100) then CC490K (poor, 25/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in C85500 and CC490K side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.