FabDigitFabDigit

Copper Alloy C85500 vs C86300

Copper Alloy · grade comparison

Copper Alloy C85500 and C86300 are both copper alloy grades. C86300 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 470 MPa (68.2 ksi) against 172 MPa (24.9 ksi) for C85500, about 173% more; tensile strength follows at 820 MPa (119 ksi) vs 414 MPa (60 ksi). In exchange, C85500 is the more ductile: elongation 35% versus 15% for C86300, and C86300 is harder (225 HB vs 75 HB). C86300 is lighter (7.65 g/cm³ vs 8.4 g/cm³ for C85500) and C85500 conducts heat better (123 W/m·K vs 36 W/m·K). On the shop floor, C85500 machines more easily (very good vs poor) and C85500 sits in a lower cost tier (premium, $$$) than C86300 (specialty, $$$$$).

C85500Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part is machined in volume.

C86300Choose it when strength drives the design, or when weight is the constraint.

C85500 vs C86300: properties

C85500C86300

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

100 GPa14.5 Msi
103 GPa14.9 Msi

Shear Modulus

37 GPa5.4 Msi
39 GPa5.7 Msi

Bulk Modulus

105 GPa15.2 Msi
107 GPa15.5 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

414 MPa60 ksi
820 MPa119 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

172 MPa24.9 ksi
470 MPa68.2 ksi

Elongation at Break

35%
15%

Compressive Strength

250 MPa36.3 ksi
480 MPa69.6 ksi

Shear Strength

275 MPa39.9 ksi
540 MPa78.3 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

110 MPa16 ksi
200 MPa29 ksi

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

25 J18.4 ft·lbf
20 J14.8 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

75 HB
225 HB

Hardness, Rockwell B

40 HRB
96 HRB

Reduction in Area

—
18%

Same in both: Poisson's Ratio 0.34

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

8.4 g/cm³0.3 lb/in³
7.65 g/cm³0.28 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

899°C1,650 °F
862°C1,584 °F

Liquidus Temperature

905°C1,661 °F
924°C1,695 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

123 W/m·K71.1 BTU/hr·ft·°F
36 W/m·K20.8 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

375 J/kg·K0.09 BTU/lb·°F
377 J/kg·K0.09 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

20.8 µm/m·K11.6 µin/in·°F
19.3 µm/m·K10.7 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

170 J/g73.1 BTU/lb
175 J/g75.2 BTU/lb

Same in both: Max Service Temperature (continuous) 200°C392 °F · Min Service Temperature -100°C-148 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

27 % IACS
8 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

6.4×10⁻⁸ Ω·m2.52 µΩ·in
2.16×10⁻⁷ Ω·m8.5 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.28 V
-0.3 V

Corrosion Resistance

52 / 100
45 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

70 / 100
25 / 100

Castability

78 / 100
80 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

85 / 100
25 / 100

Polishability

78 / 100
60 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

—
25%

Formability (cold)

—
15 / 100

Same in both: Weldability 30 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

45 MJ/kg19,347 BTU/lb
55 MJ/kg23,646 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

3.2 kg CO₂/kg
3.6 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

250 L/kg30 gal/lb
200 L/kg24 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

85%
70%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

49 kN·m/kg
107 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

11.9 MN·m/kg
13.5 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

148 kJ/m³
1,072 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

39 mm²/s
12.5 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

24
15

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every copper alloy grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

501002005001,0007.588.599.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleC86300C85500

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityC85500C86300
CNC machining—Yes
Default condition—As Cast
Relative cost$$$ Premium$$$$$ Specialty
Min. machined wall—0.8 mm
Best machined surface—Ra 1.6 µm
Chrome Plating—Yes
Electropolishing—Yes
Nickel Plating—Yes
Painting—Yes
Tin Plating—Yes

They share 4 finishes: Copper Plating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Gold Plating, Silver Plating.

C85500 vs C86300 — frequently asked

Is C86300 stronger than C85500?

Yes. C86300 has a typical yield strength of 470 MPa (68.2 ksi) against 172 MPa (24.9 ksi) for C85500 — about 173% more. Tensile strength is 820 MPa (119 ksi) vs 414 MPa (60 ksi).

Which is cheaper, C85500 or C86300?

C85500 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the premium tier ($$$) while C86300 is specialty ($$$$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, C85500 or C86300?

C85500. Its machinability rates very good (70/100) against poor (25/100) for C86300.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in C85500 and C86300 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.