FabDigitFabDigit

Copper Alloy C85400 vs CC490K

Copper Alloy · grade comparison

Copper Alloy C85400 and CC490K are both copper alloy grades. CC490K is the stronger of the two: yield strength 100 MPa (14.5 ksi) against 83 MPa (12 ksi) for C85400, about 20% more. In exchange, C85400 is the more ductile: elongation 35% versus 20% for CC490K, and CC490K is harder (65 HB vs 50 HB). C85400 is stiffer (97 GPa vs 90 GPa) and C85400 conducts heat better (87 W/m·K vs 78 W/m·K). On the shop floor, C85400 sits in a lower cost tier (premium, $$$) than CC490K (high, $$$$).

C85400Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when cost is the deciding factor.

CC490KChoose it when strength drives the design.

C85400 vs CC490K: properties

C85400CC490K

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

97 GPa14.1 Msi
90 GPa13.1 Msi

Shear Modulus

37 GPa5.4 Msi
36 GPa5.2 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

234 MPa33.9 ksi
215 MPa31.2 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

83 MPa12 ksi
100 MPa14.5 ksi

Elongation at Break

35%
20%

Reduction in Area

28%
20%

Compressive Strength

210 MPa30.5 ksi
—

Shear Strength

186 MPa27 ksi
160 MPa23.2 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

70 MPa10.2 ksi
75 MPa10.9 ksi

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

30 J22.1 ft·lbf
25 J18.4 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

50 HB
65 HB

Hardness, Rockwell B

15 HRB
25 HRB

Hardness, Vickers

53 HV
68 HV

Same in both: Bulk Modulus 105 GPa15.2 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.34

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

8.47 g/cm³0.31 lb/in³
8.7 g/cm³0.31 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

855°C1,571 °F
900°C1,652 °F

Liquidus Temperature

940°C1,724 °F
1,000°C1,832 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

87 W/m·K50.3 BTU/hr·ft·°F
78 W/m·K45.1 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

20.7 µm/m·K11.5 µin/in·°F
18.5 µm/m·K10.3 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

170 J/g73.1 BTU/lb
205 J/g88.1 BTU/lb

Min Service Temperature

-196°C-321 °F
-100°C-148 °F

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 377 J/kg·K0.09 BTU/lb·°F · Max Service Temperature (continuous) 200°C392 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

21.5 % IACS
15 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

8×10⁻⁸ Ω·m3.15 µΩ·in
1.15×10⁻⁷ Ω·m4.53 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.28 V
-0.25 V

Corrosion Resistance

55 / 100
70 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

85 / 100
80 / 100

Weldability

20 / 100
25 / 100

Formability (cold)

15 / 100
10 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

85 / 100
75 / 100

Polishability

80 / 100
60 / 100

Same in both: Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %) 80% · Castability 85 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

52 MJ/kg22,356 BTU/lb
55 MJ/kg23,646 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

3.2 kg CO₂/kg
3.6 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

250 L/kg30 gal/lb
260 L/kg31.2 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

90%
85%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

28 kN·m/kg
25 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

11.5 MN·m/kg
10.3 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

36 kJ/m³
56 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

27.2 mm²/s
23.8 mm²/s

Same in both: Thermal Shock Resistance Index 10

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every copper alloy grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

501002005001,0007.588.599.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleCC490KC85400

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityC85400CC490K
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$ Premium$$$$ High
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

Both take the same 4 finishes: Copper Plating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Gold Plating, Silver Plating.

C85400 vs CC490K — frequently asked

Is CC490K stronger than C85400?

Yes. CC490K has a typical yield strength of 100 MPa (14.5 ksi) against 83 MPa (12 ksi) for C85400 — about 20% more. Tensile strength is 215 MPa (31.2 ksi) vs 234 MPa (33.9 ksi).

Which is cheaper, C85400 or CC490K?

C85400 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the premium tier ($$$) while CC490K is high ($$$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, C85400 or CC490K?

C85400. Its machinability rates excellent (85/100) against very good (80/100) for CC490K; for welding the order is CC490K first (poor, 25/100) then C85400 (poor, 20/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in C85400 and CC490K side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.