FabDigitFabDigit

Copper Alloy C84800 vs C91300

Copper Alloy · grade comparison

Copper Alloy C84800 and C91300 are both copper alloy grades. C91300 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 210 MPa (30.5 ksi) against 124 MPa (18 ksi) for C84800, about 69% more. In exchange, C84800 is the more ductile: elongation 35% versus 0.5% for C91300, and C91300 is harder (240 HB vs 55 HB). C91300 is stiffer (103 GPa vs 86 GPa) and C91300 runs hotter in service (230°C vs 200°C continuous). On the shop floor, C84800 machines more easily (excellent vs poor), C84800 welds better (poor vs not recommended), and C91300 sits in a lower cost tier (high, $$$$) than C84800 (specialty, $$$$$).

C84800Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part is machined in volume.

C91300Choose it when strength drives the design, or when the part sees heat.

C84800 vs C91300: properties

C84800C91300

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

86 GPa12.5 Msi
103 GPa14.9 Msi

Shear Modulus

32 GPa4.6 Msi
39 GPa5.7 Msi

Bulk Modulus

105 GPa15.2 Msi
107 GPa15.5 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

262 MPa38 ksi
240 MPa34.8 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

124 MPa18 ksi
210 MPa30.5 ksi

Elongation at Break

35%
0.5%

Shear Strength

190 MPa27.6 ksi
185 MPa26.8 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

76 MPa11 ksi
70 MPa10.2 ksi

Hardness, Brinell

55 HB
240 HB

Reduction in Area

—
1%

Compressive Strength

—
650 MPa94.3 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

—
10 MPa·√m9.1 ksi·√in

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

—
2 J1.5 ft·lbf

Hardness, Rockwell B

—
100 HRB

Hardness, Rockwell C

—
22 HRC

Hardness, Vickers

—
250 HV

Same in both: Poisson's Ratio 0.34

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

8.55 g/cm³0.31 lb/in³
8.8 g/cm³0.32 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

843°C1,549 °F
798°C1,468 °F

Liquidus Temperature

1,010°C1,850 °F
890°C1,634 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

72 W/m·K41.6 BTU/hr·ft·°F
25 W/m·K14.4 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

170 J/g73.1 BTU/lb
175 J/g75.2 BTU/lb

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

200°C392 °F
230°C446 °F

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 377 J/kg·K0.09 BTU/lb·°F · Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C) 18 µm/m·K10 µin/in·°F · Min Service Temperature -196°C-321 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

16 % IACS
5 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

1.08×10⁻⁷ Ω·m4.25 µΩ·in
3.45×10⁻⁷ Ω·m13.6 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

58 / 100
65 / 100

Same in both: Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE) -0.25 V

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

88 / 100
25 / 100

Weldability

20 / 100
10 / 100

Castability

90 / 100
80 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

60 / 100
35 / 100

Polishability

55 / 100
85 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

—
20%

Formability (cold)

—
3 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

45 MJ/kg19,347 BTU/lb
108 MJ/kg46,432 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

3 kg CO₂/kg
6.6 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

250 L/kg30 gal/lb
300 L/kg35.9 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

85%
40%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

31 kN·m/kg
27 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

10.1 MN·m/kg
11.7 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

89 kJ/m³
214 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

22.3 mm²/s
7.5 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

12
3

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every copper alloy grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

501002005001,0007.588.599.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleC84800C91300

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityC84800C91300
CNC machiningYes—
Default conditionAs Cast—
Relative cost$$$$$ Specialty$$$$ High
Min. machined wall0.8 mm—
Best machined surfaceRa 1.6 µm—
Chrome PlatingYes—
ElectropolishingYes—
Nickel PlatingYes—
PaintingYes—
Tin PlatingYes—

They share 4 finishes: Copper Plating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Gold Plating, Silver Plating.

C84800 vs C91300 — frequently asked

Is C91300 stronger than C84800?

Yes. C91300 has a typical yield strength of 210 MPa (30.5 ksi) against 124 MPa (18 ksi) for C84800 — about 69% more. Tensile strength is 240 MPa (34.8 ksi) vs 262 MPa (38 ksi).

Which is cheaper, C84800 or C91300?

C91300 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the high tier ($$$$) while C84800 is specialty ($$$$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, C84800 or C91300?

C84800. Its machinability rates excellent (88/100) against poor (25/100) for C91300; for welding the order is C84800 first (poor, 20/100) then C91300 (not recommended, 10/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in C84800 and C91300 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.