FabDigitFabDigit

Copper Alloy C84400 vs CC212E

Copper Alloy · grade comparison

Copper Alloy C84400 and CC212E are both copper alloy grades. CC212E is the stronger of the two: yield strength 320 MPa (46.4 ksi) against 110 MPa (16 ksi) for C84400, about 191% more; tensile strength follows at 700 MPa (102 ksi) vs 234 MPa (33.9 ksi). CC212E is harder — 180 HB against 55 HB for C84400 — which matters for wear surfaces and threads. CC212E is lighter (7.5 g/cm³ vs 8.8 g/cm³ for C84400) and CC212E is stiffer (115 GPa vs 95 GPa). On the shop floor, C84400 machines more easily (excellent vs fair), CC212E welds better (very good vs poor), and CC212E forms better (poor vs not recommended).

C84400Choose it when the part is machined in volume.

CC212EChoose it when strength drives the design, or when surface hardness matters.

C84400 vs CC212E: properties

C84400CC212E

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

95 GPa13.8 Msi
115 GPa16.7 Msi

Shear Modulus

36 GPa5.2 Msi
43 GPa6.2 Msi

Bulk Modulus

115 GPa16.7 Msi
110 GPa16 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.34
0.32

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

234 MPa33.9 ksi
700 MPa102 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

110 MPa16 ksi
320 MPa46.4 ksi

Elongation at Break

26%
25%

Compressive Strength

260 MPa37.7 ksi
—

Shear Strength

165 MPa23.9 ksi
420 MPa60.9 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

76 MPa11 ksi
230 MPa33.4 ksi

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

20 J14.8 ft·lbf
40 J29.5 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

55 HB
180 HB

Hardness, Rockwell B

25 HRB
89 HRB

Reduction in Area

—
25%

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

—
50 MPa·√m45.5 ksi·√in

Hardness, Vickers

—
190 HV

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

8.8 g/cm³0.32 lb/in³
7.5 g/cm³0.27 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

843°C1,549 °F
870°C1,598 °F

Liquidus Temperature

954°C1,749 °F
900°C1,652 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

72 W/m·K41.6 BTU/hr·ft·°F
21 W/m·K12.1 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

377 J/kg·K0.09 BTU/lb·°F
420 J/kg·K0.1 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

18 µm/m·K10 µin/in·°F
17.5 µm/m·K9.7 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

170 J/g73.1 BTU/lb
215 J/g92.4 BTU/lb

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

200°C392 °F
250°C482 °F

Min Service Temperature

-200°C-328 °F
-196°C-321 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

16.4 % IACS
3 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

1.05×10⁻⁷ Ω·m4.13 µΩ·in
5.7×10⁻⁷ Ω·m22.4 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.28 V
-0.29 V

Corrosion Resistance

58 / 100
82 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

90 / 100
45 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

90%
50%

Weldability

20 / 100
70 / 100

Formability (cold)

10 / 100
20 / 100

Castability

90 / 100
80 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

80 / 100
25 / 100

Polishability

60 / 100
70 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

42 MJ/kg18,057 BTU/lb
58 MJ/kg24,936 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

3.2 kg CO₂/kg
4 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

250 L/kg30 gal/lb
300 L/kg35.9 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

85%
45%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

27 kN·m/kg
93 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

10.8 MN·m/kg
15.3 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

64 kJ/m³
445 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

21.7 mm²/s
6.7 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

10
7

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every copper alloy grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

501002005001,0007.588.599.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleC84400CC212E

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityC84400CC212E
CNC machiningYes—
Default conditionAs Cast—
Relative cost$$$$$ Specialty$$$$ High
Min. machined wall0.8 mm—
Best machined surfaceRa 1.6 µm—
Chrome PlatingYes—
ElectropolishingYes—
Nickel PlatingYes—
PaintingYes—
Tin PlatingYes—

They share 4 finishes: Copper Plating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Gold Plating, Silver Plating.

C84400 vs CC212E — frequently asked

Is CC212E stronger than C84400?

Yes. CC212E has a typical yield strength of 320 MPa (46.4 ksi) against 110 MPa (16 ksi) for C84400 — about 191% more. Tensile strength is 700 MPa (102 ksi) vs 234 MPa (33.9 ksi).

Which is cheaper, C84400 or CC212E?

CC212E is the lower-cost material: it sits in the high tier ($$$$) while C84400 is specialty ($$$$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, C84400 or CC212E?

C84400. Its machinability rates excellent (90/100) against fair (45/100) for CC212E; for welding the order is CC212E first (very good, 70/100) then C84400 (poor, 20/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in C84400 and CC212E side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.