FabDigitFabDigit

Copper Alloy C84400 vs C94100

Copper Alloy · grade comparison

Copper Alloy C84400 and C94100 are both copper alloy grades. C84400 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 110 MPa (16 ksi) against 86 MPa (12.5 ksi) for C94100, about 28% more; tensile strength follows at 234 MPa (33.9 ksi) vs 179 MPa (26 ksi). C84400 is the more ductile: elongation 26% versus 13% for C94100. C84400 is lighter (8.8 g/cm³ vs 9.29 g/cm³ for C94100) and C84400 is stiffer (95 GPa vs 76 GPa). On the shop floor, C84400 welds better (poor vs not recommended) and C94100 sits in a lower cost tier (high, $$$$) than C84400 (specialty, $$$$$).

C84400Choose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

C94100Choose it when the part sees heat, or when cost is the deciding factor.

C84400 vs C94100: properties

C84400C94100

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

95 GPa13.8 Msi
76 GPa11 Msi

Shear Modulus

36 GPa5.2 Msi
28 GPa4.1 Msi

Bulk Modulus

115 GPa16.7 Msi
90 GPa13.1 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

234 MPa33.9 ksi
179 MPa26 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

110 MPa16 ksi
86 MPa12.5 ksi

Elongation at Break

26%
13%

Compressive Strength

260 MPa37.7 ksi
240 MPa34.8 ksi

Shear Strength

165 MPa23.9 ksi
145 MPa21 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

76 MPa11 ksi
62 MPa9 ksi

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

20 J14.8 ft·lbf
10 J7.4 ft·lbf

Hardness, Rockwell B

25 HRB
—

Reduction in Area

—
12%

Hardness, Vickers

—
58 HV

Same in both: Poisson's Ratio 0.34 · Hardness, Brinell 55 HB

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

8.8 g/cm³0.32 lb/in³
9.29 g/cm³0.34 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

843°C1,549 °F
762°C1,404 °F

Same in both: Liquidus Temperature 954°C1,749 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

72 W/m·K41.6 BTU/hr·ft·°F
59 W/m·K34.1 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

377 J/kg·K0.09 BTU/lb·°F
251 J/kg·K0.06 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

18 µm/m·K10 µin/in·°F
18.5 µm/m·K10.3 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

170 J/g73.1 BTU/lb
165 J/g70.9 BTU/lb

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

200°C392 °F
250°C482 °F

Same in both: Min Service Temperature -200°C-328 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

16.4 % IACS
12 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

1.05×10⁻⁷ Ω·m4.13 µΩ·in
1.44×10⁻⁷ Ω·m5.67 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.28 V
-0.31 V

Corrosion Resistance

58 / 100
55 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

90 / 100
85 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

90%
80%

Weldability

20 / 100
10 / 100

Formability (cold)

10 / 100
5 / 100

Castability

90 / 100
85 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

80 / 100
35 / 100

Polishability

60 / 100
55 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

42 MJ/kg18,057 BTU/lb
55 MJ/kg23,646 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

3.2 kg CO₂/kg
3.6 kg CO₂/kg

Typical Recycled Content

85%
65%

Same in both: Embodied Water 250 L/kg30 gal/lb

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

27 kN·m/kg
19 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

10.8 MN·m/kg
8.2 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

64 kJ/m³
49 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

21.7 mm²/s
25.3 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

10
8

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every copper alloy grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

501002005001,0007.588.599.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleC84400C94100

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityC84400C94100
CNC machiningYes—
Default conditionAs Cast—
Relative cost$$$$$ Specialty$$$$ High
Min. machined wall0.8 mm—
Best machined surfaceRa 1.6 µm—
Chrome PlatingYes—
ElectropolishingYes—
Nickel PlatingYes—
PaintingYes—
Tin PlatingYes—

They share 4 finishes: Copper Plating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Gold Plating, Silver Plating.

C84400 vs C94100 — frequently asked

Is C84400 stronger than C94100?

Yes. C84400 has a typical yield strength of 110 MPa (16 ksi) against 86 MPa (12.5 ksi) for C94100 — about 28% more. Tensile strength is 234 MPa (33.9 ksi) vs 179 MPa (26 ksi).

Which is cheaper, C84400 or C94100?

C94100 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the high tier ($$$$) while C84400 is specialty ($$$$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, C84400 or C94100?

C84400, by a small margin. Both rate excellent for machinability — 90/100 against 85/100 for C94100; for welding the order is C84400 first (poor, 20/100) then C94100 (not recommended, 10/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in C84400 and C94100 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.