Copper Alloy C84400 vs C89844
Copper Alloy · grade comparison
Copper Alloy C84400 and C89844 are both copper alloy grades. C89844 is the stronger of the two: tensile strength 255 MPa (37 ksi) against 234 MPa (33.9 ksi) for C84400, about 9% more. In exchange, C84400 is the more ductile: elongation 26% versus 20% for C89844. On the shop floor, C84400 machines more easily (excellent vs very good), C89844 welds better (30 vs 20 out of 100), and C89844 sits in a lower cost tier (high, $$$$) than C84400 (specialty, $$$$$).
C84400Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part is machined in volume.
C89844Choose it when strength drives the design, or when it will be welded.
C84400 vs C89844: propertiesHow to read these bars
- One bar per material. A full bar is the highest value among all copper alloy grades in the FabDigit library; each bar is drawn as a share of that.
- The better value (by the usual engineering direction) is in bold. Rows with no direction — density, thermal conductivity — have no bold.
- Values are typical room-temperature figures for the condition named on each card.
- Confirm against the certified mill or resin datasheet before design release.
How to read these bars
- One bar per material. A full bar is the highest value among all copper alloy grades in the FabDigit library; each bar is drawn as a share of that.
- The better value (by the usual engineering direction) is in bold. Rows with no direction — density, thermal conductivity — have no bold.
- Values are typical room-temperature figures for the condition named on each card.
- Confirm against the certified mill or resin datasheet before design release.
Mechanical
Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.
Shear Modulus
Bulk Modulus
Tensile Strength (Ultimate)
Elongation at Break
Compressive Strength
Shear Strength
Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)
Reduction in Area
Hardness, Vickers
Same in both: Elastic (Young's) Modulus 95 GPa13.8 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.34 · Yield Strength (0.2% offset) 110 MPa16 ksi · Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT) 20 J14.8 ft·lbf · Hardness, Brinell 55 HB · Hardness, Rockwell B 25 HRB
Physical
Density and transition temperatures.
Density
Same in both: Melting Point (Solidus) 843°C1,549 °F · Liquidus Temperature 954°C1,749 °F
Thermal
How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.
Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)
Latent Heat of Fusion
Min Service Temperature
Same in both: Thermal Conductivity 72 W/m·K41.6 BTU/hr·ft·°F · Specific Heat Capacity 377 J/kg·K0.09 BTU/lb·°F · Max Service Temperature (continuous) 200°C392 °F
Electrical
Conductivity and insulation.
Electrical Conductivity
Electrical Resistivity
Chemical & Environmental
Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).
Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)
Corrosion Resistance
Manufacturability
FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.
Machinability
Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)
Weldability
Formability (cold)
Castability
Brazeability / Solderability
Polishability
Sustainability
Primary-production footprint per kilogram.
Embodied Energy (primary production)
Embodied Carbon (primary production)
Embodied Water
Typical Recycled Content
Common Calculations
Ratios derived from the values above.
Specific Strength (UTS / density)
Specific Stiffness (E / density)
Thermal Diffusivity
Thermal Shock Resistance Index
Same in both: Modulus of Resilience 64 kJ/m³
Strength versus weight
Yield strength against density for every copper alloy grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.
Manufacturing and finishing
| Capability | C84400 | C89844 |
|---|---|---|
| CNC machining | Yes | — |
| Default condition | As Cast | — |
| Relative cost | $$$$$ Specialty | $$$$ High |
| Min. machined wall | 0.8 mm | — |
| Best machined surface | Ra 1.6 µm | — |
| Chrome Plating | Yes | — |
| Electropolishing | Yes | — |
| Nickel Plating | Yes | — |
| Painting | Yes | — |
| Tin Plating | Yes | — |
They share 4 finishes: Copper Plating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Gold Plating, Silver Plating.
C84400 vs C89844 — frequently asked
Is C89844 stronger than C84400?
Yes. C89844 has a typical tensile strength of 255 MPa (37 ksi) against 234 MPa (33.9 ksi) for C84400 — about 9% more.
Which is cheaper, C84400 or C89844?
C89844 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the high tier ($$$$) while C84400 is specialty ($$$$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.
Which is easier to machine, C84400 or C89844?
C84400. Its machinability rates excellent (90/100) against very good (80/100) for C89844; for welding the order is C89844 first (poor, 30/100) then C84400 (poor, 20/100).
Ready to make it?
Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in C84400 and C89844 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.
Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.