FabDigitFabDigit

Copper Alloy C84400 vs C89320

Copper Alloy · grade comparison

Copper Alloy C84400 and C89320 are both copper alloy grades. C89320 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 117 MPa (17 ksi) against 110 MPa (16 ksi) for C84400, about 6% more. In exchange, C84400 is the more ductile: elongation 26% versus 15% for C89320, and C89320 is harder (60 HB vs 55 HB). C89320 is stiffer (100 GPa vs 95 GPa) and C84400 conducts heat better (72 W/m·K vs 60 W/m·K). On the shop floor, C84400 machines more easily (excellent vs very good), C89320 welds better (30 vs 20 out of 100), and C89320 sits in a lower cost tier (high, $$$$) than C84400 (specialty, $$$$$).

C84400Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part is machined in volume.

C89320Choose it when strength drives the design, or when it will be welded.

C84400 vs C89320: properties

C84400C89320

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

95 GPa13.8 Msi
100 GPa14.5 Msi

Shear Modulus

36 GPa5.2 Msi
37 GPa5.4 Msi

Bulk Modulus

115 GPa16.7 Msi
104 GPa15.1 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

234 MPa33.9 ksi
241 MPa35 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

110 MPa16 ksi
117 MPa17 ksi

Elongation at Break

26%
15%

Compressive Strength

260 MPa37.7 ksi
—

Shear Strength

165 MPa23.9 ksi
170 MPa24.7 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

76 MPa11 ksi
90 MPa13.1 ksi

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

20 J14.8 ft·lbf
14 J10.3 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

55 HB
60 HB

Reduction in Area

—
18%

Hardness, Vickers

—
63 HV

Same in both: Poisson's Ratio 0.34 · Hardness, Rockwell B 25 HRB

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

8.8 g/cm³0.32 lb/in³
8.6 g/cm³0.31 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

843°C1,549 °F
854°C1,569 °F

Liquidus Temperature

954°C1,749 °F
1,000°C1,832 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

72 W/m·K41.6 BTU/hr·ft·°F
60 W/m·K34.7 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

18 µm/m·K10 µin/in·°F
18.4 µm/m·K10.2 µin/in·°F

Min Service Temperature

-200°C-328 °F
-100°C-148 °F

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 377 J/kg·K0.09 BTU/lb·°F · Latent Heat of Fusion 170 J/g73.1 BTU/lb · Max Service Temperature (continuous) 200°C392 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

16.4 % IACS
12 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

1.05×10⁻⁷ Ω·m4.13 µΩ·in
1.44×10⁻⁷ Ω·m5.67 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.28 V
-0.25 V

Corrosion Resistance

58 / 100
70 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

90 / 100
80 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

90%
80%

Weldability

20 / 100
30 / 100

Formability (cold)

10 / 100
15 / 100

Castability

90 / 100
85 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

80 / 100
55 / 100

Same in both: Polishability 60 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

42 MJ/kg18,057 BTU/lb
55 MJ/kg23,646 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

3.2 kg CO₂/kg
3.6 kg CO₂/kg

Typical Recycled Content

85%
55%

Same in both: Embodied Water 250 L/kg30 gal/lb

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

27 kN·m/kg
28 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

10.8 MN·m/kg
11.6 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

64 kJ/m³
68 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

21.7 mm²/s
18.5 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

10
8

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every copper alloy grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

501002005001,0007.588.599.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleC84400C89320

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityC84400C89320
CNC machiningYes—
Default conditionAs Cast—
Relative cost$$$$$ Specialty$$$$ High
Min. machined wall0.8 mm—
Best machined surfaceRa 1.6 µm—
Chrome PlatingYes—
ElectropolishingYes—
Nickel PlatingYes—
PaintingYes—
Tin PlatingYes—

They share 4 finishes: Copper Plating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Gold Plating, Silver Plating.

C84400 vs C89320 — frequently asked

Is C89320 stronger than C84400?

Yes. C89320 has a typical yield strength of 117 MPa (17 ksi) against 110 MPa (16 ksi) for C84400 — about 6% more. Tensile strength is 241 MPa (35 ksi) vs 234 MPa (33.9 ksi).

Which is cheaper, C84400 or C89320?

C89320 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the high tier ($$$$) while C84400 is specialty ($$$$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, C84400 or C89320?

C84400. Its machinability rates excellent (90/100) against very good (80/100) for C89320; for welding the order is C89320 first (poor, 30/100) then C84400 (poor, 20/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in C84400 and C89320 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.