FabDigitFabDigit

Copper Alloy C84400 vs C87610

Copper Alloy · grade comparison

Copper Alloy C84400 and C87610 are both copper alloy grades. C87610 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 170 MPa (24.7 ksi) against 110 MPa (16 ksi) for C84400, about 55% more; tensile strength follows at 380 MPa (55.1 ksi) vs 234 MPa (33.9 ksi). In exchange, C84400 is the more ductile: elongation 26% versus 20% for C87610, and C87610 is harder (100 HB vs 55 HB). C87610 is lighter (8.3 g/cm³ vs 8.8 g/cm³ for C84400) and C87610 is stiffer (105 GPa vs 95 GPa). On the shop floor, C84400 machines more easily (excellent vs fair), C87610 welds better (excellent vs poor), and C87610 sits in a lower cost tier (high, $$$$) than C84400 (specialty, $$$$$).

C84400Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part is machined in volume.

C87610Choose it when strength drives the design, or when weight is the constraint.

C84400 vs C87610: properties

C84400C87610

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

95 GPa13.8 Msi
105 GPa15.2 Msi

Shear Modulus

36 GPa5.2 Msi
39 GPa5.7 Msi

Bulk Modulus

115 GPa16.7 Msi
110 GPa16 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

234 MPa33.9 ksi
380 MPa55.1 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

110 MPa16 ksi
170 MPa24.7 ksi

Elongation at Break

26%
20%

Compressive Strength

260 MPa37.7 ksi
400 MPa58 ksi

Shear Strength

165 MPa23.9 ksi
240 MPa34.8 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

76 MPa11 ksi
110 MPa16 ksi

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

20 J14.8 ft·lbf
30 J22.1 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

55 HB
100 HB

Hardness, Rockwell B

25 HRB
58 HRB

Reduction in Area

—
18%

Hardness, Vickers

—
105 HV

Same in both: Poisson's Ratio 0.34

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

8.8 g/cm³0.32 lb/in³
8.3 g/cm³0.3 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

843°C1,549 °F
820°C1,508 °F

Liquidus Temperature

954°C1,749 °F
955°C1,751 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

72 W/m·K41.6 BTU/hr·ft·°F
29 W/m·K16.8 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

377 J/kg·K0.09 BTU/lb·°F
376 J/kg·K0.09 BTU/lb·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

170 J/g73.1 BTU/lb
205 J/g88.1 BTU/lb

Min Service Temperature

-200°C-328 °F
-196°C-321 °F

Same in both: Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C) 18 µm/m·K10 µin/in·°F · Max Service Temperature (continuous) 200°C392 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

16.4 % IACS
6.7 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

1.05×10⁻⁷ Ω·m4.13 µΩ·in
2.6×10⁻⁷ Ω·m10.2 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.28 V
-0.26 V

Corrosion Resistance

58 / 100
72 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

90 / 100
42 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

90%
45%

Weldability

20 / 100
88 / 100

Formability (cold)

10 / 100
20 / 100

Castability

90 / 100
82 / 100

Polishability

60 / 100
78 / 100

Same in both: Brazeability / Solderability 80 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

42 MJ/kg18,057 BTU/lb
48 MJ/kg20,636 BTU/lb

Embodied Water

250 L/kg30 gal/lb
350 L/kg41.9 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

85%
75%

Same in both: Embodied Carbon (primary production) 3.2 kg CO₂/kg

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

27 kN·m/kg
46 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

10.8 MN·m/kg
12.7 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

64 kJ/m³
138 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

21.7 mm²/s
9.3 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

10
6

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every copper alloy grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

501002005001,0007.588.599.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleC84400C87610

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityC84400C87610
CNC machiningYes—
Default conditionAs Cast—
Relative cost$$$$$ Specialty$$$$ High
Min. machined wall0.8 mm—
Best machined surfaceRa 1.6 µm—
Chrome PlatingYes—
ElectropolishingYes—
Nickel PlatingYes—
PaintingYes—
Tin PlatingYes—

They share 4 finishes: Copper Plating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Gold Plating, Silver Plating.

C84400 vs C87610 — frequently asked

Is C87610 stronger than C84400?

Yes. C87610 has a typical yield strength of 170 MPa (24.7 ksi) against 110 MPa (16 ksi) for C84400 — about 55% more. Tensile strength is 380 MPa (55.1 ksi) vs 234 MPa (33.9 ksi).

Which is cheaper, C84400 or C87610?

C87610 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the high tier ($$$$) while C84400 is specialty ($$$$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, C84400 or C87610?

C84400. Its machinability rates excellent (90/100) against fair (42/100) for C87610; for welding the order is C87610 first (excellent, 88/100) then C84400 (poor, 20/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in C84400 and C87610 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.