FabDigitFabDigit

Copper Alloy C84400 vs C87600

Copper Alloy · grade comparison

Copper Alloy C84400 and C87600 are both copper alloy grades. C87600 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 220 MPa (31.9 ksi) against 110 MPa (16 ksi) for C84400, about 100% more; tensile strength follows at 435 MPa (63.1 ksi) vs 234 MPa (33.9 ksi). In exchange, C84400 is the more ductile: elongation 26% versus 20% for C87600, and C87600 is harder (105 HB vs 55 HB). C87600 is lighter (8.3 g/cm³ vs 8.8 g/cm³ for C84400) and C87600 is stiffer (103 GPa vs 95 GPa). On the shop floor, C84400 machines more easily (excellent vs fair), C87600 welds better (very good vs poor), and C87600 sits in a lower cost tier (high, $$$$) than C84400 (specialty, $$$$$).

C84400Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part is machined in volume.

C87600Choose it when strength drives the design, or when weight is the constraint.

C84400 vs C87600: properties

C84400C87600

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

95 GPa13.8 Msi
103 GPa14.9 Msi

Shear Modulus

36 GPa5.2 Msi
39 GPa5.7 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.34
0.33

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

234 MPa33.9 ksi
435 MPa63.1 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

110 MPa16 ksi
220 MPa31.9 ksi

Elongation at Break

26%
20%

Compressive Strength

260 MPa37.7 ksi
—

Shear Strength

165 MPa23.9 ksi
260 MPa37.7 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

76 MPa11 ksi
130 MPa18.9 ksi

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

20 J14.8 ft·lbf
25 J18.4 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

55 HB
105 HB

Hardness, Rockwell B

25 HRB
62 HRB

Reduction in Area

—
20%

Hardness, Vickers

—
110 HV

Same in both: Bulk Modulus 115 GPa16.7 Msi

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

8.8 g/cm³0.32 lb/in³
8.3 g/cm³0.3 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

843°C1,549 °F
900°C1,652 °F

Liquidus Temperature

954°C1,749 °F
1,010°C1,850 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

72 W/m·K41.6 BTU/hr·ft·°F
29 W/m·K16.8 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

377 J/kg·K0.09 BTU/lb·°F
380 J/kg·K0.09 BTU/lb·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

170 J/g73.1 BTU/lb
205 J/g88.1 BTU/lb

Min Service Temperature

-200°C-328 °F
-196°C-321 °F

Same in both: Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C) 18 µm/m·K10 µin/in·°F · Max Service Temperature (continuous) 200°C392 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

16.4 % IACS
6.5 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

1.05×10⁻⁷ Ω·m4.13 µΩ·in
2.65×10⁻⁷ Ω·m10.4 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.28 V
-0.26 V

Corrosion Resistance

58 / 100
70 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

90 / 100
40 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

90%
40%

Weldability

20 / 100
75 / 100

Formability (cold)

10 / 100
20 / 100

Castability

90 / 100
85 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

80 / 100
70 / 100

Polishability

60 / 100
75 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

42 MJ/kg18,057 BTU/lb
50 MJ/kg21,496 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

3.2 kg CO₂/kg
3.6 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

250 L/kg30 gal/lb
260 L/kg31.2 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

85%
75%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

27 kN·m/kg
52 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

10.8 MN·m/kg
12.4 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

64 kJ/m³
235 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

21.7 mm²/s
9.2 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

10
7

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every copper alloy grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

501002005001,0007.588.599.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleC84400C87600

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityC84400C87600
CNC machiningYes—
Default conditionAs Cast—
Relative cost$$$$$ Specialty$$$$ High
Min. machined wall0.8 mm—
Best machined surfaceRa 1.6 µm—
Chrome PlatingYes—
ElectropolishingYes—
Nickel PlatingYes—
PaintingYes—
Tin PlatingYes—

They share 4 finishes: Copper Plating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Gold Plating, Silver Plating.

C84400 vs C87600 — frequently asked

Is C87600 stronger than C84400?

Yes. C87600 has a typical yield strength of 220 MPa (31.9 ksi) against 110 MPa (16 ksi) for C84400 — about 100% more. Tensile strength is 435 MPa (63.1 ksi) vs 234 MPa (33.9 ksi).

Which is cheaper, C84400 or C87600?

C87600 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the high tier ($$$$) while C84400 is specialty ($$$$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, C84400 or C87600?

C84400. Its machinability rates excellent (90/100) against fair (40/100) for C87600; for welding the order is C87600 first (very good, 75/100) then C84400 (poor, 20/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in C84400 and C87600 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.