Copper Alloy C83400 vs ZCuZn26Al4Fe3Mn3
Copper Alloy · grade comparison
Copper Alloy C83400 and ZCuZn26Al4Fe3Mn3 are both copper alloy grades. ZCuZn26Al4Fe3Mn3 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 330 MPa (47.9 ksi) against 69 MPa (10 ksi) for C83400, about 4.8 times as much; tensile strength follows at 620 MPa (89.9 ksi) vs 234 MPa (33.9 ksi). In exchange, C83400 is the more ductile: elongation 35% versus 20% for ZCuZn26Al4Fe3Mn3, and ZCuZn26Al4Fe3Mn3 is harder (160 HB vs 50 HB). ZCuZn26Al4Fe3Mn3 is lighter (7.6 g/cm³ vs 8.8 g/cm³ for C83400) and ZCuZn26Al4Fe3Mn3 runs hotter in service (250°C vs 200°C continuous). On the shop floor, C83400 machines more easily (good vs fair), C83400 welds better (fair vs poor), and ZCuZn26Al4Fe3Mn3 sits in a lower cost tier (premium, $$$) than C83400 (high, $$$$).
C83400Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part is machined in volume.
ZCuZn26Al4Fe3Mn3Choose it when strength drives the design, or when weight is the constraint.
C83400 vs ZCuZn26Al4Fe3Mn3: propertiesHow to read these bars
- One bar per material. A full bar is the highest value among all copper alloy grades in the FabDigit library; each bar is drawn as a share of that.
- The better value (by the usual engineering direction) is in bold. Rows with no direction — density, thermal conductivity — have no bold.
- Values are typical room-temperature figures for the condition named on each card.
- Confirm against the certified mill or resin datasheet before design release.
How to read these bars
- One bar per material. A full bar is the highest value among all copper alloy grades in the FabDigit library; each bar is drawn as a share of that.
- The better value (by the usual engineering direction) is in bold. Rows with no direction — density, thermal conductivity — have no bold.
- Values are typical room-temperature figures for the condition named on each card.
- Confirm against the certified mill or resin datasheet before design release.
Mechanical
Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.
Elastic (Young's) Modulus
Shear Modulus
Bulk Modulus
Tensile Strength (Ultimate)
Yield Strength (0.2% offset)
Elongation at Break
Reduction in Area
Shear Strength
Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)
Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)
Hardness, Brinell
Hardness, Vickers
Hardness, Rockwell B
Same in both: Poisson's Ratio 0.34
Physical
Density and transition temperatures.
Density
Melting Point (Solidus)
Liquidus Temperature
Thermal
How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.
Thermal Conductivity
Specific Heat Capacity
Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)
Latent Heat of Fusion
Max Service Temperature (continuous)
Min Service Temperature
Electrical
Conductivity and insulation.
Electrical Conductivity
Electrical Resistivity
Chemical & Environmental
Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).
Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)
Corrosion Resistance
Manufacturability
FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.
Machinability
Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)
Weldability
Formability (cold)
Castability
Brazeability / Solderability
Polishability
Sustainability
Primary-production footprint per kilogram.
Embodied Energy (primary production)
Embodied Water
Typical Recycled Content
Same in both: Embodied Carbon (primary production) 3.6 kg CO₂/kg
Common Calculations
Ratios derived from the values above.
Specific Strength (UTS / density)
Specific Stiffness (E / density)
Modulus of Resilience
Thermal Diffusivity
Thermal Shock Resistance Index
Strength versus weight
Yield strength against density for every copper alloy grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.
Manufacturing and finishing
| Capability | C83400 | ZCuZn26Al4Fe3Mn3 |
|---|---|---|
| CNC machining | Yes | — |
| Default condition | As Cast | — |
| Relative cost | $$$$ High | $$$ Premium |
| Min. machined wall | 0.8 mm | — |
| Best machined surface | Ra 1.6 µm | — |
| Chrome Plating | Yes | — |
| Electropolishing | Yes | — |
| Nickel Plating | Yes | — |
| Painting | Yes | — |
| Tin Plating | Yes | — |
They share 4 finishes: Copper Plating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Gold Plating, Silver Plating.
C83400 vs ZCuZn26Al4Fe3Mn3 — frequently asked
Is ZCuZn26Al4Fe3Mn3 stronger than C83400?
Yes. ZCuZn26Al4Fe3Mn3 has a typical yield strength of 330 MPa (47.9 ksi) against 69 MPa (10 ksi) for C83400 — about 4.8 times as much. Tensile strength is 620 MPa (89.9 ksi) vs 234 MPa (33.9 ksi).
Which is cheaper, C83400 or ZCuZn26Al4Fe3Mn3?
ZCuZn26Al4Fe3Mn3 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the premium tier ($$$) while C83400 is high ($$$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.
Which is easier to machine, C83400 or ZCuZn26Al4Fe3Mn3?
C83400. Its machinability rates good (58/100) against fair (35/100) for ZCuZn26Al4Fe3Mn3; for welding the order is C83400 first (fair, 45/100) then ZCuZn26Al4Fe3Mn3 (poor, 30/100).
Ready to make it?
Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in C83400 and ZCuZn26Al4Fe3Mn3 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.
Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.