Copper Alloy C83400 vs YBsC3
Copper Alloy · grade comparison
Copper Alloy C83400 and YBsC3 are both copper alloy grades. YBsC3 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 105 MPa (15.2 ksi) against 69 MPa (10 ksi) for C83400, about 52% more; tensile strength follows at 295 MPa (42.8 ksi) vs 234 MPa (33.9 ksi). In exchange, C83400 is the more ductile: elongation 35% versus 25% for YBsC3, and YBsC3 is harder (70 HB vs 50 HB). YBsC3 is lighter (8.4 g/cm³ vs 8.8 g/cm³ for C83400) and C83400 conducts heat better (159 W/m·K vs 120 W/m·K). On the shop floor, YBsC3 machines more easily (excellent vs good), C83400 welds better (fair vs poor), and YBsC3 sits in a lower cost tier (premium, $$$) than C83400 (high, $$$$).
C83400Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when it will be welded.
YBsC3Choose it when strength drives the design, or when weight is the constraint.
C83400 vs YBsC3: propertiesHow to read these bars
- One bar per material. A full bar is the highest value among all copper alloy grades in the FabDigit library; each bar is drawn as a share of that.
- The better value (by the usual engineering direction) is in bold. Rows with no direction — density, thermal conductivity — have no bold.
- Values are typical room-temperature figures for the condition named on each card.
- Confirm against the certified mill or resin datasheet before design release.
How to read these bars
- One bar per material. A full bar is the highest value among all copper alloy grades in the FabDigit library; each bar is drawn as a share of that.
- The better value (by the usual engineering direction) is in bold. Rows with no direction — density, thermal conductivity — have no bold.
- Values are typical room-temperature figures for the condition named on each card.
- Confirm against the certified mill or resin datasheet before design release.
Mechanical
Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.
Elastic (Young's) Modulus
Bulk Modulus
Tensile Strength (Ultimate)
Yield Strength (0.2% offset)
Elongation at Break
Reduction in Area
Shear Strength
Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)
Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)
Hardness, Brinell
Hardness, Vickers
Compressive Strength
Hardness, Rockwell B
Same in both: Shear Modulus 37 GPa5.4 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.34
Physical
Density and transition temperatures.
Density
Melting Point (Solidus)
Liquidus Temperature
Thermal
How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.
Thermal Conductivity
Specific Heat Capacity
Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)
Latent Heat of Fusion
Min Service Temperature
Same in both: Max Service Temperature (continuous) 200°C392 °F
Electrical
Conductivity and insulation.
Electrical Conductivity
Electrical Resistivity
Chemical & Environmental
Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).
Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)
Corrosion Resistance
Manufacturability
FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.
Machinability
Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)
Weldability
Formability (cold)
Castability
Brazeability / Solderability
Polishability
Sustainability
Primary-production footprint per kilogram.
Embodied Energy (primary production)
Embodied Water
Typical Recycled Content
Same in both: Embodied Carbon (primary production) 3.6 kg CO₂/kg
Common Calculations
Ratios derived from the values above.
Specific Strength (UTS / density)
Specific Stiffness (E / density)
Modulus of Resilience
Thermal Diffusivity
Thermal Shock Resistance Index
Strength versus weight
Yield strength against density for every copper alloy grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.
Manufacturing and finishing
| Capability | C83400 | YBsC3 |
|---|---|---|
| CNC machining | Yes | — |
| Default condition | As Cast | — |
| Relative cost | $$$$ High | $$$ Premium |
| Min. machined wall | 0.8 mm | — |
| Best machined surface | Ra 1.6 µm | — |
| Chrome Plating | Yes | — |
| Electropolishing | Yes | — |
| Nickel Plating | Yes | — |
| Painting | Yes | — |
| Tin Plating | Yes | — |
They share 4 finishes: Copper Plating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Gold Plating, Silver Plating.
C83400 vs YBsC3 — frequently asked
Is YBsC3 stronger than C83400?
Yes. YBsC3 has a typical yield strength of 105 MPa (15.2 ksi) against 69 MPa (10 ksi) for C83400 — about 52% more. Tensile strength is 295 MPa (42.8 ksi) vs 234 MPa (33.9 ksi).
Which is cheaper, C83400 or YBsC3?
YBsC3 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the premium tier ($$$) while C83400 is high ($$$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.
Which is easier to machine, C83400 or YBsC3?
YBsC3. Its machinability rates excellent (85/100) against good (58/100) for C83400; for welding the order is C83400 first (fair, 45/100) then YBsC3 (poor, 25/100).
Ready to make it?
Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in C83400 and YBsC3 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.
Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.