FabDigitFabDigit

Copper Alloy C83400 vs C85700

Copper Alloy · grade comparison

Copper Alloy C83400 and C85700 are both copper alloy grades. C85700 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 140 MPa (20.3 ksi) against 69 MPa (10 ksi) for C83400, about 103% more; tensile strength follows at 380 MPa (55.1 ksi) vs 234 MPa (33.9 ksi). In exchange, C83400 is the more ductile: elongation 35% versus 18% for C85700, and C85700 is harder (75 HB vs 50 HB). C85700 is lighter (8.41 g/cm³ vs 8.8 g/cm³ for C83400) and C83400 conducts heat better (159 W/m·K vs 84 W/m·K). On the shop floor, C85700 machines more easily (very good vs good), C83400 welds better (fair vs poor), and C85700 sits in a lower cost tier (premium, $$$) than C83400 (high, $$$$).

C83400Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when it will be welded.

C85700Choose it when strength drives the design, or when weight is the constraint.

C83400 vs C85700: properties

C83400C85700

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

96.5 GPa14 Msi
100 GPa14.5 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

234 MPa33.9 ksi
380 MPa55.1 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

69 MPa10 ksi
140 MPa20.3 ksi

Elongation at Break

35%
18%

Reduction in Area

30%
—

Shear Strength

165 MPa23.9 ksi
240 MPa34.8 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

70 MPa10.2 ksi
105 MPa15.2 ksi

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

40 J29.5 ft·lbf
14 J10.3 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

50 HB
75 HB

Hardness, Vickers

53 HV
—

Same in both: Shear Modulus 37 GPa5.4 Msi · Bulk Modulus 105 GPa15.2 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.34

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

8.8 g/cm³0.32 lb/in³
8.41 g/cm³0.3 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

1,010°C1,850 °F
875°C1,607 °F

Liquidus Temperature

1,055°C1,931 °F
905°C1,661 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

159 W/m·K91.9 BTU/hr·ft·°F
84 W/m·K48.5 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

376 J/kg·K0.09 BTU/lb·°F
377 J/kg·K0.09 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

18.4 µm/m·K10.2 µin/in·°F
21.6 µm/m·K12 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

205 J/g88.1 BTU/lb
165 J/g70.9 BTU/lb

Min Service Temperature

-200°C-328 °F
-196°C-321 °F

Same in both: Max Service Temperature (continuous) 200°C392 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

32 % IACS
22 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

5.39×10⁻⁸ Ω·m2.12 µΩ·in
7.8×10⁻⁸ Ω·m3.07 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.25 V
-0.3 V

Corrosion Resistance

62 / 100
45 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

58 / 100
80 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

65%
—

Weldability

45 / 100
20 / 100

Formability (cold)

30 / 100
—

Castability

72 / 100
80 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

88 / 100
75 / 100

Same in both: Polishability 70 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

58 MJ/kg24,936 BTU/lb
60 MJ/kg25,795 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

3.6 kg CO₂/kg
4 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

260 L/kg31.2 gal/lb
320 L/kg38.3 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

80%
90%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

27 kN·m/kg
45 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

11 MN·m/kg
11.9 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

25 kJ/m³
98 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

48.1 mm²/s
26.5 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

21
15

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every copper alloy grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

501002005001,0007.588.599.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleC83400C85700

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityC83400C85700
CNC machiningYes—
Default conditionAs Cast—
Relative cost$$$$ High$$$ Premium
Min. machined wall0.8 mm—
Best machined surfaceRa 1.6 µm—
Chrome PlatingYes—
ElectropolishingYes—
Nickel PlatingYes—
PaintingYes—
Tin PlatingYes—

They share 4 finishes: Copper Plating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Gold Plating, Silver Plating.

C83400 vs C85700 — frequently asked

Is C85700 stronger than C83400?

Yes. C85700 has a typical yield strength of 140 MPa (20.3 ksi) against 69 MPa (10 ksi) for C83400 — about 103% more. Tensile strength is 380 MPa (55.1 ksi) vs 234 MPa (33.9 ksi).

Which is cheaper, C83400 or C85700?

C85700 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the premium tier ($$$) while C83400 is high ($$$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, C83400 or C85700?

C85700. Its machinability rates very good (80/100) against good (58/100) for C83400; for welding the order is C83400 first (fair, 45/100) then C85700 (poor, 20/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in C83400 and C85700 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.