FabDigitFabDigit

Copper Alloy C74500 vs C79600

Copper Alloy · grade comparison

Copper Alloy C74500 and C79600 are both copper alloy grades. C79600 is the stronger of the two: tensile strength 550 MPa (79.8 ksi) against 510 MPa (74 ksi) for C74500, about 8% more. C79600 is the more ductile: elongation 15% versus 12% for C74500, and C79600 is harder (160 HB vs 150 HB). C74500 is stiffer (127 GPa vs 117 GPa) and C79600 runs hotter in service (200°C vs 180°C continuous). On the shop floor, C79600 machines more easily (very good vs poor) and C74500 welds better (fair vs poor).

C74500Choose it when it will be welded.

C79600Choose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

C74500 vs C79600: properties

C74500C79600

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

127 GPa18.4 Msi
117 GPa17 Msi

Shear Modulus

48 GPa7 Msi
44 GPa6.4 Msi

Bulk Modulus

128 GPa18.6 Msi
115 GPa16.7 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

510 MPa74 ksi
550 MPa79.8 ksi

Elongation at Break

12%
15%

Shear Strength

330 MPa47.9 ksi
340 MPa49.3 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

180 MPa26.1 ksi
185 MPa26.8 ksi

Hardness, Brinell

150 HB
160 HB

Hardness, Rockwell B

80 HRB
85 HRB

Hardness, Vickers

158 HV
170 HV

Same in both: Poisson's Ratio 0.33 · Yield Strength (0.2% offset) 400 MPa58 ksi

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

8.73 g/cm³0.32 lb/in³
8.52 g/cm³0.31 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

954°C1,749 °F
875°C1,607 °F

Liquidus Temperature

1,021°C1,870 °F
925°C1,697 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

45 W/m·K26 BTU/hr·ft·°F
33 W/m·K19.1 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

377 J/kg·K0.09 BTU/lb·°F
380 J/kg·K0.09 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

16.2 µm/m·K9 µin/in·°F
18 µm/m·K10 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

195 J/g83.8 BTU/lb
175 J/g75.2 BTU/lb

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

180°C356 °F
200°C392 °F

Min Service Temperature

-200°C-328 °F
-100°C-148 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

9 % IACS
8 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

1.92×10⁻⁷ Ω·m7.56 µΩ·in
2.15×10⁻⁷ Ω·m8.46 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.26 V
-0.25 V

Corrosion Resistance

62 / 100
55 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

30 / 100
72 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

20%
70%

Weldability

40 / 100
20 / 100

Formability (cold)

60 / 100
35 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

88 / 100
70 / 100

Polishability

90 / 100
80 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

78 MJ/kg33,534 BTU/lb
62 MJ/kg26,655 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

5.2 kg CO₂/kg
4.2 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

260 L/kg31.2 gal/lb
250 L/kg30 gal/lb

Same in both: Typical Recycled Content 40%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

58 kN·m/kg
65 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

14.5 MN·m/kg
13.7 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

630 kJ/m³
684 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

13.7 mm²/s
10.2 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

11
9

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every copper alloy grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

501002005001,0007.588.599.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleC74500C79600

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityC74500C79600
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$$ High$$$$ High
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

Both take the same 4 finishes: Copper Plating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Gold Plating, Silver Plating.

C74500 vs C79600 — frequently asked

Is C79600 stronger than C74500?

Yes. C79600 has a typical tensile strength of 550 MPa (79.8 ksi) against 510 MPa (74 ksi) for C74500 — about 8% more.

Which is cheaper, C74500 or C79600?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$$, high); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, C74500 or C79600?

C79600. Its machinability rates very good (72/100) against poor (30/100) for C74500; for welding the order is C74500 first (fair, 40/100) then C79600 (poor, 20/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in C74500 and C79600 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.