Copper Alloy C52100 vs C64200
Copper Alloy · grade comparison
Copper Alloy C52100 and C64200 are both copper alloy grades. C52100 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 585 MPa (84.8 ksi) against 370 MPa (53.7 ksi) for C64200, about 58% more. In exchange, C64200 is the more ductile: elongation 32% versus 10% for C52100, and C64200 is harder (180 HB vs 170 HB). C64200 is lighter (7.69 g/cm³ vs 8.8 g/cm³ for C52100) and C64200 is stiffer (117 GPa vs 110 GPa). On the shop floor, C64200 machines more easily (good vs poor) and C64200 welds better (very good vs fair).
C52100Choose it when strength drives the design.
C64200Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when weight is the constraint.
C52100 vs C64200: propertiesHow to read these bars
- One bar per material. A full bar is the highest value among all copper alloy grades in the FabDigit library; each bar is drawn as a share of that.
- The better value (by the usual engineering direction) is in bold. Rows with no direction — density, thermal conductivity — have no bold.
- Values are typical room-temperature figures for the condition named on each card.
- Confirm against the certified mill or resin datasheet before design release.
How to read these bars
- One bar per material. A full bar is the highest value among all copper alloy grades in the FabDigit library; each bar is drawn as a share of that.
- The better value (by the usual engineering direction) is in bold. Rows with no direction — density, thermal conductivity — have no bold.
- Values are typical room-temperature figures for the condition named on each card.
- Confirm against the certified mill or resin datasheet before design release.
Mechanical
Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.
Elastic (Young's) Modulus
Shear Modulus
Poisson's Ratio
Tensile Strength (Ultimate)
Yield Strength (0.2% offset)
Elongation at Break
Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)
Hardness, Brinell
Hardness, Vickers
Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)
Same in both: Bulk Modulus 115 GPa16.7 Msi · Shear Strength 400 MPa58 ksi · Hardness, Rockwell B 87 HRB
Physical
Density and transition temperatures.
Density
Melting Point (Solidus)
Liquidus Temperature
Thermal
How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.
Thermal Conductivity
Specific Heat Capacity
Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)
Max Service Temperature (continuous)
Min Service Temperature
Latent Heat of Fusion
Electrical
Conductivity and insulation.
Electrical Conductivity
Electrical Resistivity
Chemical & Environmental
Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).
Corrosion Resistance
Same in both: Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE) -0.28 V
Manufacturability
FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.
Machinability
Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)
Weldability
Formability (cold)
Brazeability / Solderability
Polishability
Castability
Sustainability
Primary-production footprint per kilogram.
Embodied Energy (primary production)
Embodied Carbon (primary production)
Same in both: Embodied Water 350 L/kg41.9 gal/lb · Typical Recycled Content 40%
Common Calculations
Ratios derived from the values above.
Specific Strength (UTS / density)
Specific Stiffness (E / density)
Modulus of Resilience
Thermal Diffusivity
Thermal Shock Resistance Index
Strength versus weight
Yield strength against density for every copper alloy grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.
Manufacturing and finishing
| Capability | C52100 | C64200 |
|---|---|---|
| Default condition | — | HR50 |
| Relative cost | $$$$$ Specialty | $$$$$ Specialty |
| Min. machined wall | 0.8 mm | 0.8 mm |
| Best machined surface | Ra 1.6 µm | Ra 1.6 µm |
Both are offered for CNC machining and Sheet metal. Both take the same 9 finishes: Chrome Plating, Copper Plating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Electropolishing, Gold Plating, Nickel Plating, Painting, Silver Plating, Tin Plating.
C52100 vs C64200 — frequently asked
Is C52100 stronger than C64200?
Yes. C52100 has a typical yield strength of 585 MPa (84.8 ksi) against 370 MPa (53.7 ksi) for C64200 — about 58% more. Tensile strength is 660 MPa (95.7 ksi) vs 690 MPa (100 ksi).
Which is cheaper, C52100 or C64200?
Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$$$, specialty); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.
Which is easier to machine, C52100 or C64200?
C64200. Its machinability rates good (55/100) against poor (30/100) for C52100; for welding the order is C64200 first (very good, 70/100) then C52100 (fair, 40/100).
Ready to make it?
Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in C52100 and C64200 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.
Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.