FabDigitFabDigit

Copper Alloy C50200 vs C52100

Copper Alloy · grade comparison

Copper Alloy C50200 and C52100 are both copper alloy grades. C52100 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 585 MPa (84.8 ksi) against 320 MPa (46.4 ksi) for C50200, about 83% more; tensile strength follows at 660 MPa (95.7 ksi) vs 370 MPa (53.7 ksi). In exchange, C50200 is the more ductile: elongation 12% versus 10% for C52100, and C52100 is harder (170 HB vs 112 HB). C52100 runs hotter in service (200°C vs 150°C continuous) and C50200 conducts heat better (215 W/m·K vs 62 W/m·K). On the shop floor, C50200 welds better (good vs fair) and C50200 sits in a lower cost tier (high, $$$$) than C52100 (specialty, $$$$$).

C50200Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when it will be welded.

C52100Choose it when strength drives the design, or when the part sees heat.

C50200 vs C52100: properties

C50200C52100

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

115 GPa16.7 Msi
110 GPa16 Msi

Shear Modulus

44 GPa6.4 Msi
41 GPa5.9 Msi

Bulk Modulus

125 GPa18.1 Msi
115 GPa16.7 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

370 MPa53.7 ksi
660 MPa95.7 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

320 MPa46.4 ksi
585 MPa84.8 ksi

Elongation at Break

12%
10%

Reduction in Area

40%
—

Compressive Strength

325 MPa47.1 ksi
—

Shear Strength

235 MPa34.1 ksi
400 MPa58 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

150 MPa21.8 ksi
230 MPa33.4 ksi

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

40 J29.5 ft·lbf
—

Hardness, Brinell

112 HB
170 HB

Hardness, Rockwell B

62 HRB
87 HRB

Hardness, Vickers

120 HV
190 HV

Same in both: Poisson's Ratio 0.34

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

8.89 g/cm³0.32 lb/in³
8.8 g/cm³0.32 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

1,060°C1,940 °F
854°C1,569 °F

Liquidus Temperature

1,080°C1,976 °F
1,000°C1,832 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

215 W/m·K124 BTU/hr·ft·°F
62 W/m·K35.8 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

17.8 µm/m·K9.9 µin/in·°F
18.4 µm/m·K10.2 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

205 J/g88.1 BTU/lb
—

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

150°C302 °F
200°C392 °F

Min Service Temperature

-196°C-321 °F
-200°C-328 °F

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 377 J/kg·K0.09 BTU/lb·°F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

55 % IACS
13 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

3.13×10⁻⁸ Ω·m1.23 µΩ·in
1.33×10⁻⁷ Ω·m5.24 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.3 V
-0.28 V

Corrosion Resistance

65 / 100
68 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Weldability

55 / 100
40 / 100

Formability (cold)

60 / 100
50 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

90 / 100
88 / 100

Same in both: Machinability 30 / 100 · Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %) 20% · Polishability 75 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

57 MJ/kg24,506 BTU/lb
72 MJ/kg30,954 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

3.9 kg CO₂/kg
4.6 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

300 L/kg35.9 gal/lb
350 L/kg41.9 gal/lb

Same in both: Typical Recycled Content 40%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

42 kN·m/kg
75 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

12.9 MN·m/kg
12.5 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

445 kJ/m³
1,556 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

64.1 mm²/s
18.7 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

39
20

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every copper alloy grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

501002005001,0007.588.599.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleC52100C50200

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityC50200C52100
CNC machining—Yes
Sheet metal—Yes
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$$ High$$$$$ Specialty
Min. machined wall—0.8 mm
Best machined surface—Ra 1.6 µm
Chrome Plating—Yes
Electropolishing—Yes
Nickel Plating—Yes
Painting—Yes
Tin Plating—Yes

They share 4 finishes: Copper Plating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Gold Plating, Silver Plating.

C50200 vs C52100 — frequently asked

Is C52100 stronger than C50200?

Yes. C52100 has a typical yield strength of 585 MPa (84.8 ksi) against 320 MPa (46.4 ksi) for C50200 — about 83% more. Tensile strength is 660 MPa (95.7 ksi) vs 370 MPa (53.7 ksi).

Which is cheaper, C50200 or C52100?

C50200 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the high tier ($$$$) while C52100 is specialty ($$$$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which welds better, C50200 or C52100?

C50200. Its weldability rates good (55/100) against fair (40/100) for C52100.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in C50200 and C52100 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.