FabDigitFabDigit

Copper Alloy C33000 vs C69700

Copper Alloy · grade comparison

Copper Alloy C33000 and C69700 are both copper alloy grades. C69700 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 240 MPa (34.8 ksi) against 110 MPa (16 ksi) for C33000, about 118% more; tensile strength follows at 485 MPa (70.3 ksi) vs 340 MPa (49.3 ksi). In exchange, C33000 is the more ductile: elongation 55% versus 28% for C69700, and C69700 is harder (120 HB vs 55 HB). C33000 conducts heat better (121 W/m·K vs 33 W/m·K).

C33000Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

C69700Choose it when strength drives the design.

C33000 vs C69700: properties

C33000C69700

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

103 GPa14.9 Msi
105 GPa15.2 Msi

Bulk Modulus

111 GPa16.1 Msi
110 GPa16 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

340 MPa49.3 ksi
485 MPa70.3 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

110 MPa16 ksi
240 MPa34.8 ksi

Elongation at Break

55%
28%

Reduction in Area

62%
—

Shear Strength

220 MPa31.9 ksi
300 MPa43.5 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

105 MPa15.2 ksi
160 MPa23.2 ksi

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

55 J40.6 ft·lbf
30 J22.1 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

55 HB
120 HB

Hardness, Vickers

58 HV
—

Hardness, Rockwell B

—
68 HRB

Same in both: Shear Modulus 39 GPa5.7 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.34

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

8.47 g/cm³0.31 lb/in³
8.3 g/cm³0.3 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

899°C1,650 °F
820°C1,508 °F

Liquidus Temperature

954°C1,749 °F
900°C1,652 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

121 W/m·K69.9 BTU/hr·ft·°F
33 W/m·K19.1 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

375 J/kg·K0.09 BTU/lb·°F
380 J/kg·K0.09 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

20.2 µm/m·K11.2 µin/in·°F
20.5 µm/m·K11.4 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

170 J/g73.1 BTU/lb
175 J/g75.2 BTU/lb

Min Service Temperature

-200°C-328 °F
-196°C-321 °F

Same in both: Max Service Temperature (continuous) 200°C392 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

26 % IACS
6.5 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

6.6×10⁻⁸ Ω·m2.6 µΩ·in
2.65×10⁻⁷ Ω·m10.4 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

55 / 100
62 / 100

Same in both: Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE) -0.25 V

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

70 / 100
72 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

180%
70%

Formability (cold)

85 / 100
45 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

85 / 100
70 / 100

Same in both: Weldability 25 / 100 · Polishability 80 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

55 MJ/kg23,646 BTU/lb
45 MJ/kg19,347 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

3.6 kg CO₂/kg
2.9 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

180 L/kg21.6 gal/lb
300 L/kg35.9 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

50%
40%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

40 kN·m/kg
58 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

12.2 MN·m/kg
12.7 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

59 kJ/m³
274 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

38.1 mm²/s
10.5 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

20
7

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every copper alloy grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

501002005001,0007.588.599.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleC33000C69700

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityC33000C69700
CNC machiningYes—
Sheet metalYes—
Default conditionO—
Relative cost$$$$ High$$$$ High
Min. machined wall0.8 mm—
Best machined surfaceRa 1.6 µm—
Chrome PlatingYes—
ElectropolishingYes—
Nickel PlatingYes—
PaintingYes—
Tin PlatingYes—

They share 4 finishes: Copper Plating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Gold Plating, Silver Plating.

C33000 vs C69700 — frequently asked

Is C69700 stronger than C33000?

Yes. C69700 has a typical yield strength of 240 MPa (34.8 ksi) against 110 MPa (16 ksi) for C33000 — about 118% more. Tensile strength is 485 MPa (70.3 ksi) vs 340 MPa (49.3 ksi).

Which is cheaper, C33000 or C69700?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$$, high); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

When should I choose C33000 over C69700?

Pick C33000 when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded. Pick C69700 when strength drives the design.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in C33000 and C69700 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.