FabDigitFabDigit

Copper Alloy C26000 vs C67400

Copper Alloy · grade comparison

Copper Alloy C26000 and C67400 are both copper alloy grades. C67400 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 331 MPa (48 ksi) against 105 MPa (15.2 ksi) for C26000, about 3.2 times as much; tensile strength follows at 655 MPa (95 ksi) vs 325 MPa (47.1 ksi). In exchange, C26000 is the more ductile: elongation 62% versus 20% for C67400, and C67400 is harder (185 HB vs 55 HB). C26000 conducts heat better (121 W/m·K vs 40 W/m·K).

C26000Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

C67400Choose it when strength drives the design.

C26000 vs C67400: properties

C26000C67400

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

110 GPa16 Msi
105 GPa15.2 Msi

Shear Modulus

41 GPa5.9 Msi
39 GPa5.7 Msi

Bulk Modulus

115 GPa16.7 Msi
110 GPa16 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.35
0.34

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

325 MPa47.1 ksi
655 MPa95 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

105 MPa15.2 ksi
331 MPa48 ksi

Elongation at Break

62%
20%

Shear Strength

234 MPa33.9 ksi
400 MPa58 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

97 MPa14.1 ksi
190 MPa27.6 ksi

Hardness, Brinell

55 HB
185 HB

Hardness, Vickers

60 HV
—

Reduction in Area

—
40%

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

—
25 J18.4 ft·lbf

Hardness, Rockwell B

—
88 HRB

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

8.53 g/cm³0.31 lb/in³
8.36 g/cm³0.3 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

915°C1,679 °F
862°C1,584 °F

Liquidus Temperature

955°C1,751 °F
880°C1,616 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

121 W/m·K69.9 BTU/hr·ft·°F
40 W/m·K23.1 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

375 J/kg·K0.09 BTU/lb·°F
377 J/kg·K0.09 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

19.9 µm/m·K11.1 µin/in·°F
21 µm/m·K11.7 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

165 J/g70.9 BTU/lb
170 J/g73.1 BTU/lb

Same in both: Max Service Temperature (continuous) 200°C392 °F · Min Service Temperature -200°C-328 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

28 % IACS
8 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

6.2×10⁻⁸ Ω·m2.44 µΩ·in
2.15×10⁻⁷ Ω·m8.46 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.28 V
-0.27 V

Corrosion Resistance

50 / 100
65 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

30 / 100
28 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

30%
75%

Weldability

40 / 100
35 / 100

Formability (cold)

98 / 100
40 / 100

Castability

25 / 100
—

Brazeability / Solderability

90 / 100
60 / 100

Polishability

85 / 100
70 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Water

250 L/kg30 gal/lb
300 L/kg35.9 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

45%
40%

Same in both: Embodied Energy (primary production) 55 MJ/kg23,646 BTU/lb · Embodied Carbon (primary production) 3.5 kg CO₂/kg

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

38 kN·m/kg
78 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

12.9 MN·m/kg
12.6 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

50 kJ/m³
522 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

37.8 mm²/s
12.7 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

18
12

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every copper alloy grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

501002005001,0007.588.599.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleC26000C67400

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityC26000C67400
CNC machiningYes—
Sheet metalYes—
Default conditionO—
Relative cost$$$$ High$$$$ High
Min. machined wall0.8 mm—
Best machined surfaceRa 1.6 µm—
Chrome PlatingYes—
ElectropolishingYes—
Nickel PlatingYes—
PaintingYes—
Tin PlatingYes—

They share 4 finishes: Copper Plating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Gold Plating, Silver Plating.

C26000 vs C67400 — frequently asked

Is C67400 stronger than C26000?

Yes. C67400 has a typical yield strength of 331 MPa (48 ksi) against 105 MPa (15.2 ksi) for C26000 — about 3.2 times as much. Tensile strength is 655 MPa (95 ksi) vs 325 MPa (47.1 ksi).

Which is cheaper, C26000 or C67400?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$$, high); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which welds better, C26000 or C67400?

C26000. Its weldability rates fair (40/100) against fair (35/100) for C67400.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in C26000 and C67400 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.