FabDigitFabDigit

Copper Alloy C17300 vs C17500

Copper Alloy · grade comparison

Copper Alloy C17300 and C17500 are both copper alloy grades. C17500 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 620 MPa (89.9 ksi) against 220 MPa (31.9 ksi) for C17300, about 182% more; tensile strength follows at 760 MPa (110 ksi) vs 470 MPa (68.2 ksi). In exchange, C17300 is the more ductile: elongation 40% versus 15% for C17500, and C17500 is harder (220 HB vs 110 HB). C17300 is lighter (8.26 g/cm³ vs 8.75 g/cm³ for C17500) and C17500 is stiffer (138 GPa vs 128 GPa). On the shop floor, C17300 machines more easily (50 vs 40 out of 100), C17500 welds better (good vs poor), and C17500 sits in a lower cost tier (high, $$$$) than C17300 (specialty, $$$$$).

C17300Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when weight is the constraint.

C17500Choose it when strength drives the design, or when the part sees heat.

C17300 vs C17500: properties

C17300C17500

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

128 GPa18.6 Msi
138 GPa20 Msi

Shear Modulus

50 GPa7.3 Msi
53 GPa7.7 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

470 MPa68.2 ksi
760 MPa110 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

220 MPa31.9 ksi
620 MPa89.9 ksi

Elongation at Break

40%
15%

Reduction in Area

50%
35%

Shear Strength

310 MPa45 ksi
430 MPa62.4 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

210 MPa30.5 ksi
240 MPa34.8 ksi

Hardness, Brinell

110 HB
220 HB

Hardness, Rockwell B

60 HRB
96 HRB

Hardness, Vickers

115 HV
230 HV

Hardness, Rockwell C

—
23 HRC

Same in both: Bulk Modulus 115 GPa16.7 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.3

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

8.26 g/cm³0.3 lb/in³
8.75 g/cm³0.32 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

865°C1,589 °F
1,030°C1,886 °F

Liquidus Temperature

980°C1,796 °F
1,070°C1,958 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

105 W/m·K60.7 BTU/hr·ft·°F
215 W/m·K124 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

420 J/kg·K0.1 BTU/lb·°F
419 J/kg·K0.1 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

17.5 µm/m·K9.7 µin/in·°F
17.6 µm/m·K9.8 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

200 J/g86 BTU/lb
205 J/g88.1 BTU/lb

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

150°C302 °F
350°C662 °F

Same in both: Min Service Temperature -200°C-328 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

18 % IACS
52 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

9.6×10⁻⁸ Ω·m3.78 µΩ·in
3.3×10⁻⁸ Ω·m1.3 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.23 V
-0.22 V

Corrosion Resistance

62 / 100
65 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

50 / 100
40 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

50%
20%

Weldability

15 / 100
60 / 100

Formability (cold)

70 / 100
35 / 100

Castability

45 / 100
55 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

60 / 100
65 / 100

Polishability

75 / 100
80 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

120 MJ/kg51,591 BTU/lb
95 MJ/kg40,843 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

7.5 kg CO₂/kg
6.5 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

350 L/kg41.9 gal/lb
300 L/kg35.9 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

35%
30%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

57 kN·m/kg
87 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

15.5 MN·m/kg
15.8 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

189 kJ/m³
1,393 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

30.3 mm²/s
58.6 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

22
67

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every copper alloy grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

501002005001,0007.588.599.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleC17300C17500

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityC17300C17500
CNC machiningYes—
Sheet metalYes—
Default conditionA—
Relative cost$$$$$ Specialty$$$$ High
Min. machined wall0.8 mm—
Best machined surfaceRa 1.6 µm—
Chrome PlatingYes—
ElectropolishingYes—
Nickel PlatingYes—
PaintingYes—
Tin PlatingYes—

They share 4 finishes: Copper Plating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Gold Plating, Silver Plating.

C17300 vs C17500 — frequently asked

Is C17500 stronger than C17300?

Yes. C17500 has a typical yield strength of 620 MPa (89.9 ksi) against 220 MPa (31.9 ksi) for C17300 — about 182% more. Tensile strength is 760 MPa (110 ksi) vs 470 MPa (68.2 ksi).

Which is cheaper, C17300 or C17500?

C17500 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the high tier ($$$$) while C17300 is specialty ($$$$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, C17300 or C17500?

C17300, by a small margin. Both rate fair for machinability — 50/100 against 40/100 for C17500; for welding the order is C17500 first (good, 60/100) then C17300 (poor, 15/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in C17300 and C17500 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.