FabDigitFabDigit

Copper Alloy C17300 vs C70250

Copper Alloy · grade comparison

Copper Alloy C17300 and C70250 are both copper alloy grades. C70250 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 640 MPa (92.8 ksi) against 220 MPa (31.9 ksi) for C17300, about 191% more; tensile strength follows at 700 MPa (102 ksi) vs 470 MPa (68.2 ksi). In exchange, C17300 is the more ductile: elongation 40% versus 9% for C70250, and C70250 is harder (200 HV vs 115 HV). C17300 is lighter (8.26 g/cm³ vs 8.82 g/cm³ for C70250) and C70250 runs hotter in service (200°C vs 150°C continuous). On the shop floor, C17300 machines more easily (50 vs 35 out of 100), C70250 welds better (fair vs poor), and C70250 sits in a lower cost tier (high, $$$$) than C17300 (specialty, $$$$$).

C17300Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when weight is the constraint.

C70250Choose it when strength drives the design, or when the part sees heat.

C17300 vs C70250: properties

C17300C70250

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

128 GPa18.6 Msi
131 GPa19 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

470 MPa68.2 ksi
700 MPa102 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

220 MPa31.9 ksi
640 MPa92.8 ksi

Elongation at Break

40%
9%

Reduction in Area

50%
—

Shear Strength

310 MPa45 ksi
425 MPa61.6 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

210 MPa30.5 ksi
285 MPa41.3 ksi

Hardness, Brinell

110 HB
—

Hardness, Rockwell B

60 HRB
96 HRB

Hardness, Vickers

115 HV
200 HV

Same in both: Shear Modulus 50 GPa7.3 Msi · Bulk Modulus 115 GPa16.7 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.3

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

8.26 g/cm³0.3 lb/in³
8.82 g/cm³0.32 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

865°C1,589 °F
1,065°C1,949 °F

Liquidus Temperature

980°C1,796 °F
1,095°C2,003 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

105 W/m·K60.7 BTU/hr·ft·°F
155 W/m·K89.6 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

420 J/kg·K0.1 BTU/lb·°F
377 J/kg·K0.09 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

17.5 µm/m·K9.7 µin/in·°F
17.6 µm/m·K9.8 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

200 J/g86 BTU/lb
205 J/g88.1 BTU/lb

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

150°C302 °F
200°C392 °F

Same in both: Min Service Temperature -200°C-328 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

18 % IACS
40 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

9.6×10⁻⁸ Ω·m3.78 µΩ·in
4.31×10⁻⁸ Ω·m1.7 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.23 V
-0.2 V

Same in both: Corrosion Resistance 62 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

50 / 100
35 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

50%
30%

Weldability

15 / 100
35 / 100

Formability (cold)

70 / 100
65 / 100

Castability

45 / 100
—

Brazeability / Solderability

60 / 100
80 / 100

Same in both: Polishability 75 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

120 MJ/kg51,591 BTU/lb
58 MJ/kg24,936 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

7.5 kg CO₂/kg
4 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

350 L/kg41.9 gal/lb
300 L/kg35.9 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

35%
30%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

57 kN·m/kg
79 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

15.5 MN·m/kg
14.9 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

189 kJ/m³
1,563 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

30.3 mm²/s
46.6 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

22
47

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every copper alloy grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

501002005001,0007.588.599.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleC17300C70250

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityC17300C70250
CNC machiningYes—
Sheet metalYes—
Default conditionA—
Relative cost$$$$$ Specialty$$$$ High
Min. machined wall0.8 mm—
Best machined surfaceRa 1.6 µm—
Chrome PlatingYes—
ElectropolishingYes—
Nickel PlatingYes—
PaintingYes—
Tin PlatingYes—

They share 4 finishes: Copper Plating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Gold Plating, Silver Plating.

C17300 vs C70250 — frequently asked

Is C70250 stronger than C17300?

Yes. C70250 has a typical yield strength of 640 MPa (92.8 ksi) against 220 MPa (31.9 ksi) for C17300 — about 191% more. Tensile strength is 700 MPa (102 ksi) vs 470 MPa (68.2 ksi).

Which is cheaper, C17300 or C70250?

C70250 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the high tier ($$$$) while C17300 is specialty ($$$$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, C17300 or C70250?

C17300, by a small margin. Both rate fair for machinability — 50/100 against 35/100 for C70250; for welding the order is C70250 first (fair, 35/100) then C17300 (poor, 15/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in C17300 and C70250 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.