FabDigitFabDigit

Copper Alloy C17200 vs C90700

Copper Alloy · grade comparison

Copper Alloy C17200 and C90700 are both copper alloy grades. C17200 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 260 MPa (37.7 ksi) against 152 MPa (22 ksi) for C90700, about 71% more; tensile strength follows at 490 MPa (71.1 ksi) vs 305 MPa (44.2 ksi). C17200 is the more ductile: elongation 45% versus 12% for C90700, and C17200 is harder (105 HB vs 80 HB). C17200 is lighter (8.26 g/cm³ vs 8.77 g/cm³ for C90700) and C17200 is stiffer (128 GPa vs 110 GPa). On the shop floor, C90700 machines more easily (45 vs 35 out of 100), C17200 welds better (fair vs poor), and C90700 sits in a lower cost tier (high, $$$$) than C17200 (specialty, $$$$$).

C17200Choose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

C90700Choose it when the part sees heat, or when the part is machined in volume.

C17200 vs C90700: properties

C17200C90700

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

128 GPa18.6 Msi
110 GPa16 Msi

Shear Modulus

49 GPa7.1 Msi
41 GPa5.9 Msi

Bulk Modulus

107 GPa15.5 Msi
115 GPa16.7 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.3
0.34

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

490 MPa71.1 ksi
305 MPa44.2 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

260 MPa37.7 ksi
152 MPa22 ksi

Elongation at Break

45%
12%

Reduction in Area

55%
12%

Shear Strength

320 MPa46.4 ksi
205 MPa29.7 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

205 MPa29.7 ksi
105 MPa15.2 ksi

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

90 J66.4 ft·lbf
10 J7.4 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

105 HB
80 HB

Hardness, Rockwell B

62 HRB
41 HRB

Compressive Strength

—
420 MPa60.9 ksi

Hardness, Vickers

—
85 HV

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

8.26 g/cm³0.3 lb/in³
8.77 g/cm³0.32 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

865°C1,589 °F
830°C1,526 °F

Liquidus Temperature

980°C1,796 °F
1,000°C1,832 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

105 W/m·K60.7 BTU/hr·ft·°F
50 W/m·K28.9 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

420 J/kg·K0.1 BTU/lb·°F
377 J/kg·K0.09 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

17 µm/m·K9.4 µin/in·°F
18.4 µm/m·K10.2 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

205 J/g88.1 BTU/lb
170 J/g73.1 BTU/lb

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

150°C302 °F
250°C482 °F

Min Service Temperature

-250°C-418 °F
-200°C-328 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

17 % IACS
10.9 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

1.01×10⁻⁷ Ω·m3.98 µΩ·in
1.58×10⁻⁷ Ω·m6.22 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.25 V
-0.31 V

Same in both: Corrosion Resistance 65 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

35 / 100
45 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

20%
60%

Weldability

45 / 100
25 / 100

Formability (cold)

90 / 100
10 / 100

Castability

50 / 100
80 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

80 / 100
85 / 100

Polishability

85 / 100
70 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

95 MJ/kg40,843 BTU/lb
62 MJ/kg26,655 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

6.5 kg CO₂/kg
4.5 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

280 L/kg33.6 gal/lb
300 L/kg35.9 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

30%
45%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

59 kN·m/kg
35 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

15.5 MN·m/kg
12.5 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

264 kJ/m³
105 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

30.3 mm²/s
15.1 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

24
8

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every copper alloy grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

501002005001,0007.588.599.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleC17200C90700

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityC17200C90700
CNC machiningYes—
Sheet metalYes—
Default conditionA—
Relative cost$$$$$ Specialty$$$$ High
Min. machined wall0.8 mm—
Best machined surfaceRa 1.6 µm—
Chrome PlatingYes—
ElectropolishingYes—
Nickel PlatingYes—
PaintingYes—
Tin PlatingYes—

They share 4 finishes: Copper Plating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Gold Plating, Silver Plating.

C17200 vs C90700 — frequently asked

Is C17200 stronger than C90700?

Yes. C17200 has a typical yield strength of 260 MPa (37.7 ksi) against 152 MPa (22 ksi) for C90700 — about 71% more. Tensile strength is 490 MPa (71.1 ksi) vs 305 MPa (44.2 ksi).

Which is cheaper, C17200 or C90700?

C90700 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the high tier ($$$$) while C17200 is specialty ($$$$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, C17200 or C90700?

C90700, by a small margin. Both rate fair for machinability — 45/100 against 35/100 for C17200; for welding the order is C17200 first (fair, 45/100) then C90700 (poor, 25/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in C17200 and C90700 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.