FabDigitFabDigit

Copper Alloy C14500 vs C19400

Copper Alloy · grade comparison

Copper Alloy C14500 and C19400 are both copper alloy grades. C19400 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 370 MPa (53.7 ksi) against 275 MPa (39.9 ksi) for C14500, about 35% more; tensile strength follows at 420 MPa (60.9 ksi) vs 310 MPa (45 ksi). In exchange, C14500 is the more ductile: elongation 18% versus 10% for C19400, and C19400 is harder (115 HB vs 85 HB). C14500 conducts heat better (350 W/m·K vs 260 W/m·K). On the shop floor, C14500 machines more easily (excellent vs poor) and C19400 welds better (fair vs poor).

C14500Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part is machined in volume.

C19400Choose it when strength drives the design, or when it will be welded.

C14500 vs C19400: properties

C14500C19400

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

117 GPa17 Msi
121 GPa17.5 Msi

Shear Modulus

44 GPa6.4 Msi
46 GPa6.7 Msi

Bulk Modulus

140 GPa20.3 Msi
130 GPa18.9 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.34
0.31

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

310 MPa45 ksi
420 MPa60.9 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

275 MPa39.9 ksi
370 MPa53.7 ksi

Elongation at Break

18%
10%

Shear Strength

195 MPa28.3 ksi
265 MPa38.4 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

95 MPa13.8 ksi
170 MPa24.7 ksi

Hardness, Brinell

85 HB
115 HB

Hardness, Rockwell B

40 HRB
63 HRB

Hardness, Vickers

—
120 HV

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

8.94 g/cm³0.32 lb/in³
8.91 g/cm³0.32 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

1,051°C1,924 °F
1,080°C1,976 °F

Liquidus Temperature

1,065°C1,949 °F
1,090°C1,994 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

350 W/m·K202 BTU/hr·ft·°F
260 W/m·K150 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

17.6 µm/m·K9.8 µin/in·°F
16.5 µm/m·K9.2 µin/in·°F

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 385 J/kg·K0.09 BTU/lb·°F · Latent Heat of Fusion 205 J/g88.1 BTU/lb · Max Service Temperature (continuous) 200°C392 °F · Min Service Temperature -200°C-328 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

92 % IACS
65 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

1.87×10⁻⁸ Ω·m0.736 µΩ·in
2.65×10⁻⁸ Ω·m1.04 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

65 / 100
58 / 100

Same in both: Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE) -0.2 V

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

85 / 100
30 / 100

Weldability

25 / 100
45 / 100

Formability (cold)

40 / 100
60 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

—
20%

Castability

—
40 / 100

Same in both: Brazeability / Solderability 90 / 100 · Polishability 70 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

3.6 kg CO₂/kg
3.8 kg CO₂/kg

Same in both: Embodied Energy (primary production) 57 MJ/kg24,506 BTU/lb · Embodied Water 260 L/kg31.2 gal/lb · Typical Recycled Content 35%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

35 kN·m/kg
47 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

13.1 MN·m/kg
13.6 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

323 kJ/m³
566 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

101.7 mm²/s
75.8 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

53
55

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every copper alloy grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

501002005001,0007.588.599.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleC14500C19400

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityC14500C19400
CNC machiningYes—
Sheet metalYes—
Default conditionH02—
Relative cost$$$$ High$$$$ High
Min. machined wall0.8 mm—
Best machined surfaceRa 1.6 µm—
Chrome PlatingYes—
ElectropolishingYes—
Nickel PlatingYes—
PaintingYes—
Tin PlatingYes—

They share 4 finishes: Copper Plating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Gold Plating, Silver Plating.

C14500 vs C19400 — frequently asked

Is C19400 stronger than C14500?

Yes. C19400 has a typical yield strength of 370 MPa (53.7 ksi) against 275 MPa (39.9 ksi) for C14500 — about 35% more. Tensile strength is 420 MPa (60.9 ksi) vs 310 MPa (45 ksi).

Which is cheaper, C14500 or C19400?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$$, high); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, C14500 or C19400?

C14500. Its machinability rates excellent (85/100) against poor (30/100) for C19400; for welding the order is C19400 first (fair, 45/100) then C14500 (poor, 25/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in C14500 and C19400 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.