FabDigitFabDigit

Copper Alloy C14500 vs C16500

Copper Alloy · grade comparison

Copper Alloy C14500 and C16500 are both copper alloy grades. C16500 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 430 MPa (62.4 ksi) against 275 MPa (39.9 ksi) for C14500, about 56% more; tensile strength follows at 462 MPa (67 ksi) vs 310 MPa (45 ksi). In exchange, C14500 is the more ductile: elongation 18% versus 4% for C16500, and C16500 is harder (120 HB vs 85 HB). C14500 conducts heat better (350 W/m·K vs 235 W/m·K). On the shop floor, C14500 machines more easily (excellent vs poor) and C16500 welds better (fair vs poor).

C14500Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part is machined in volume.

C16500Choose it when strength drives the design, or when it will be welded.

C14500 vs C16500: properties

C14500C16500

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Bulk Modulus

140 GPa20.3 Msi
138 GPa20 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

310 MPa45 ksi
462 MPa67 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

275 MPa39.9 ksi
430 MPa62.4 ksi

Elongation at Break

18%
4%

Shear Strength

195 MPa28.3 ksi
270 MPa39.2 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

95 MPa13.8 ksi
165 MPa23.9 ksi

Hardness, Brinell

85 HB
120 HB

Hardness, Rockwell B

40 HRB
68 HRB

Hardness, Vickers

—
130 HV

Same in both: Elastic (Young's) Modulus 117 GPa17 Msi · Shear Modulus 44 GPa6.4 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.34

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

8.94 g/cm³0.32 lb/in³
8.89 g/cm³0.32 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

1,051°C1,924 °F
1,030°C1,886 °F

Liquidus Temperature

1,065°C1,949 °F
1,076°C1,969 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

350 W/m·K202 BTU/hr·ft·°F
235 W/m·K136 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Min Service Temperature

-200°C-328 °F
-250°C-418 °F

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 385 J/kg·K0.09 BTU/lb·°F · Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C) 17.6 µm/m·K9.8 µin/in·°F · Latent Heat of Fusion 205 J/g88.1 BTU/lb · Max Service Temperature (continuous) 200°C392 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

92 % IACS
62 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

1.87×10⁻⁸ Ω·m0.736 µΩ·in
2.78×10⁻⁸ Ω·m1.09 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

65 / 100
68 / 100

Same in both: Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE) -0.2 V

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

85 / 100
22 / 100

Weldability

25 / 100
45 / 100

Formability (cold)

40 / 100
45 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

90 / 100
80 / 100

Polishability

70 / 100
75 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

—
20%

Castability

—
40 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Water

260 L/kg31.2 gal/lb
250 L/kg30 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

35%
25%

Same in both: Embodied Energy (primary production) 57 MJ/kg24,506 BTU/lb · Embodied Carbon (primary production) 3.6 kg CO₂/kg

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

35 kN·m/kg
52 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

13.1 MN·m/kg
13.2 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

323 kJ/m³
790 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

101.7 mm²/s
68.7 mm²/s

Same in both: Thermal Shock Resistance Index 53

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every copper alloy grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

501002005001,0007.588.599.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleC14500C16500

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityC14500C16500
CNC machiningYes—
Sheet metalYes—
Default conditionH02—
Relative cost$$$$ High$$$$ High
Min. machined wall0.8 mm—
Best machined surfaceRa 1.6 µm—
Chrome PlatingYes—
ElectropolishingYes—
Nickel PlatingYes—
PaintingYes—
Tin PlatingYes—

They share 4 finishes: Copper Plating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Gold Plating, Silver Plating.

C14500 vs C16500 — frequently asked

Is C16500 stronger than C14500?

Yes. C16500 has a typical yield strength of 430 MPa (62.4 ksi) against 275 MPa (39.9 ksi) for C14500 — about 56% more. Tensile strength is 462 MPa (67 ksi) vs 310 MPa (45 ksi).

Which is cheaper, C14500 or C16500?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$$, high); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, C14500 or C16500?

C14500. Its machinability rates excellent (85/100) against poor (22/100) for C16500; for welding the order is C16500 first (fair, 45/100) then C14500 (poor, 25/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in C14500 and C16500 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.