FabDigitFabDigit

Copper Alloy C14500 vs C15500

Copper Alloy · grade comparison

Copper Alloy C14500 and C15500 are both copper alloy grades. C15500 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 310 MPa (45 ksi) against 275 MPa (39.9 ksi) for C14500, about 13% more; tensile strength follows at 345 MPa (50 ksi) vs 310 MPa (45 ksi). In exchange, C14500 is the more ductile: elongation 18% versus 6% for C15500, and C15500 is harder (100 HB vs 85 HB). C15500 runs hotter in service (250°C vs 200°C continuous). On the shop floor, C14500 machines more easily (excellent vs poor) and C15500 welds better (good vs poor).

C14500Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part is machined in volume.

C15500Choose it when strength drives the design, or when the part sees heat.

C14500 vs C15500: properties

C14500C15500

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

310 MPa45 ksi
345 MPa50 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

275 MPa39.9 ksi
310 MPa45 ksi

Elongation at Break

18%
6%

Shear Strength

195 MPa28.3 ksi
200 MPa29 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

95 MPa13.8 ksi
115 MPa16.7 ksi

Hardness, Brinell

85 HB
100 HB

Hardness, Rockwell B

40 HRB
55 HRB

Hardness, Vickers

—
105 HV

Same in both: Elastic (Young's) Modulus 117 GPa17 Msi · Shear Modulus 44 GPa6.4 Msi · Bulk Modulus 140 GPa20.3 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.34

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Melting Point (Solidus)

1,051°C1,924 °F
1,065°C1,949 °F

Liquidus Temperature

1,065°C1,949 °F
1,083°C1,981 °F

Same in both: Density 8.94 g/cm³0.32 lb/in³

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

350 W/m·K202 BTU/hr·ft·°F
344 W/m·K199 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

200°C392 °F
250°C482 °F

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 385 J/kg·K0.09 BTU/lb·°F · Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C) 17.6 µm/m·K9.8 µin/in·°F · Latent Heat of Fusion 205 J/g88.1 BTU/lb · Min Service Temperature -200°C-328 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Same in both: Electrical Conductivity 92 % IACS · Electrical Resistivity 1.87×10⁻⁸ Ω·m0.736 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.2 V
-0.25 V

Corrosion Resistance

65 / 100
68 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

85 / 100
22 / 100

Weldability

25 / 100
55 / 100

Formability (cold)

40 / 100
45 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

90 / 100
95 / 100

Polishability

70 / 100
80 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

—
20%

Castability

—
40 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

57 MJ/kg24,506 BTU/lb
55 MJ/kg23,646 BTU/lb

Embodied Water

260 L/kg31.2 gal/lb
300 L/kg35.9 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

35%
30%

Same in both: Embodied Carbon (primary production) 3.6 kg CO₂/kg

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

35 kN·m/kg
39 kN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

323 kJ/m³
411 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

101.7 mm²/s
99.9 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

53
58

Same in both: Specific Stiffness (E / density) 13.1 MN·m/kg

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every copper alloy grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

501002005001,0007.588.599.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleC14500C15500

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityC14500C15500
CNC machiningYes—
Sheet metalYes—
Default conditionH02—
Relative cost$$$$ High$$$$ High
Min. machined wall0.8 mm—
Best machined surfaceRa 1.6 µm—
Chrome PlatingYes—
ElectropolishingYes—
Nickel PlatingYes—
PaintingYes—
Tin PlatingYes—

They share 4 finishes: Copper Plating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Gold Plating, Silver Plating.

C14500 vs C15500 — frequently asked

Is C15500 stronger than C14500?

Yes. C15500 has a typical yield strength of 310 MPa (45 ksi) against 275 MPa (39.9 ksi) for C14500 — about 13% more. Tensile strength is 345 MPa (50 ksi) vs 310 MPa (45 ksi).

Which is cheaper, C14500 or C15500?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$$, high); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, C14500 or C15500?

C14500. Its machinability rates excellent (85/100) against poor (22/100) for C15500; for welding the order is C15500 first (good, 55/100) then C14500 (poor, 25/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in C14500 and C15500 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.