FabDigitFabDigit

Copper Alloy C12600 vs C14500

Copper Alloy · grade comparison

Copper Alloy C12600 and C14500 are both copper alloy grades. C12600 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 310 MPa (45 ksi) against 275 MPa (39.9 ksi) for C14500, about 13% more; tensile strength follows at 345 MPa (50 ksi) vs 310 MPa (45 ksi). In exchange, C14500 is the more ductile: elongation 18% versus 6% for C12600, and C12600 is harder (95 HB vs 85 HB). C14500 runs hotter in service (200°C vs 150°C continuous). On the shop floor, C14500 machines more easily (excellent vs poor) and C12600 welds better (fair vs poor).

C12600Choose it when strength drives the design, or when it will be welded.

C14500Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part sees heat.

C12600 vs C14500: properties

C12600C14500

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

345 MPa50 ksi
310 MPa45 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

310 MPa45 ksi
275 MPa39.9 ksi

Elongation at Break

6%
18%

Reduction in Area

55%
—

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

115 MPa16.7 ksi
95 MPa13.8 ksi

Hardness, Brinell

95 HB
85 HB

Hardness, Rockwell B

50 HRB
40 HRB

Same in both: Elastic (Young's) Modulus 117 GPa17 Msi · Shear Modulus 44 GPa6.4 Msi · Bulk Modulus 140 GPa20.3 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.34 · Shear Strength 195 MPa28.3 ksi

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Melting Point (Solidus)

1,065°C1,949 °F
1,051°C1,924 °F

Liquidus Temperature

1,083°C1,981 °F
1,065°C1,949 °F

Same in both: Density 8.94 g/cm³0.32 lb/in³

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

388 W/m·K224 BTU/hr·ft·°F
350 W/m·K202 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

17.7 µm/m·K9.8 µin/in·°F
17.6 µm/m·K9.8 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

150°C302 °F
200°C392 °F

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 385 J/kg·K0.09 BTU/lb·°F · Latent Heat of Fusion 205 J/g88.1 BTU/lb · Min Service Temperature -200°C-328 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

97 % IACS
92 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

1.78×10⁻⁸ Ω·m0.701 µΩ·in
1.87×10⁻⁸ Ω·m0.736 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

60 / 100
65 / 100

Same in both: Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE) -0.2 V

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

30 / 100
85 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

20%
—

Weldability

35 / 100
25 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

95 / 100
90 / 100

Polishability

75 / 100
70 / 100

Same in both: Formability (cold) 40 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

55 MJ/kg23,646 BTU/lb
57 MJ/kg24,506 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

3.8 kg CO₂/kg
3.6 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

300 L/kg35.9 gal/lb
260 L/kg31.2 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

45%
35%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

39 kN·m/kg
35 kN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

411 kJ/m³
323 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

112.7 mm²/s
101.7 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

65
53

Same in both: Specific Stiffness (E / density) 13.1 MN·m/kg

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every copper alloy grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

501002005001,0007.588.599.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleC14500C12600

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityC12600C14500
CNC machining—Yes
Sheet metal—Yes
Default condition—H02
Relative cost$$$$ High$$$$ High
Min. machined wall—0.8 mm
Best machined surface—Ra 1.6 µm
Chrome Plating—Yes
Electropolishing—Yes
Nickel Plating—Yes
Painting—Yes
Tin Plating—Yes

They share 4 finishes: Copper Plating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Gold Plating, Silver Plating.

C12600 vs C14500 — frequently asked

Is C12600 stronger than C14500?

Yes. C12600 has a typical yield strength of 310 MPa (45 ksi) against 275 MPa (39.9 ksi) for C14500 — about 13% more. Tensile strength is 345 MPa (50 ksi) vs 310 MPa (45 ksi).

Which is cheaper, C12600 or C14500?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$$, high); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, C12600 or C14500?

C14500. Its machinability rates excellent (85/100) against poor (30/100) for C12600; for welding the order is C12600 first (fair, 35/100) then C14500 (poor, 25/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in C12600 and C14500 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.