FabDigitFabDigit

Copper Alloy C10100 vs C82200

Copper Alloy · grade comparison

Copper Alloy C10100 and C82200 are both copper alloy grades. C82200 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 415 MPa (60.2 ksi) against 69 MPa (10 ksi) for C10100, about 6.0 times as much; tensile strength follows at 620 MPa (89.9 ksi) vs 235 MPa (34.1 ksi). In exchange, C10100 is the more ductile: elongation 45% versus 5% for C82200, and C82200 is harder (195 HB vs 45 HB). C82200 is stiffer (130 GPa vs 117 GPa) and C82200 runs hotter in service (300°C vs 200°C continuous). On the shop floor, C82200 machines more easily (30 vs 18 out of 100), C10100 welds better (very good vs fair), and C82200 sits in a lower cost tier (high, $$$$) than C10100 (specialty, $$$$$).

C10100Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when it will be welded.

C82200Choose it when strength drives the design, or when the part sees heat.

C10100 vs C82200: properties

C10100C82200

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

117 GPa17 Msi
130 GPa18.9 Msi

Shear Modulus

44 GPa6.4 Msi
50 GPa7.3 Msi

Bulk Modulus

140 GPa20.3 Msi
115 GPa16.7 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.34
0.3

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

235 MPa34.1 ksi
620 MPa89.9 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

69 MPa10 ksi
415 MPa60.2 ksi

Elongation at Break

45%
5%

Reduction in Area

75%
—

Shear Strength

152 MPa22 ksi
400 MPa58 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

76 MPa11 ksi
180 MPa26.1 ksi

Hardness, Brinell

45 HB
195 HB

Hardness, Vickers

50 HV
205 HV

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

—
14 J10.3 ft·lbf

Hardness, Rockwell B

—
93 HRB

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

8.94 g/cm³0.32 lb/in³
8.75 g/cm³0.32 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

1,083°C1,981 °F
1,030°C1,886 °F

Liquidus Temperature

1,083°C1,981 °F
1,090°C1,994 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

391 W/m·K226 BTU/hr·ft·°F
190 W/m·K110 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

385 J/kg·K0.09 BTU/lb·°F
420 J/kg·K0.1 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

17.7 µm/m·K9.8 µin/in·°F
17.8 µm/m·K9.9 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

200°C392 °F
300°C572 °F

Min Service Temperature

-253°C-423 °F
-200°C-328 °F

Same in both: Latent Heat of Fusion 205 J/g88.1 BTU/lb

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

101 % IACS
45 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

1.71×10⁻⁸ Ω·m0.672 µΩ·in
3.83×10⁻⁸ Ω·m1.51 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.24 V
-0.25 V

Corrosion Resistance

58 / 100
62 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

18 / 100
30 / 100

Weldability

70 / 100
50 / 100

Formability (cold)

95 / 100
15 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

95 / 100
65 / 100

Polishability

85 / 100
70 / 100

Castability

—
78 / 100

Same in both: Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %) 20%

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

60 MJ/kg25,795 BTU/lb
85 MJ/kg36,543 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

3.8 kg CO₂/kg
6 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

250 L/kg30 gal/lb
350 L/kg41.9 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

5%
30%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

26 kN·m/kg
71 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

13.1 MN·m/kg
14.9 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

20 kJ/m³
662 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

113.6 mm²/s
51.7 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

44
51

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every copper alloy grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

501002005001,0007.588.599.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleC10100C82200

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityC10100C82200
CNC machiningYes—
Sheet metalYes—
Default conditionO—
Relative cost$$$$$ Specialty$$$$ High
Min. machined wall0.8 mm—
Best machined surfaceRa 1.6 µm—
Chrome PlatingYes—
ElectropolishingYes—
Nickel PlatingYes—
PaintingYes—
Tin PlatingYes—

They share 4 finishes: Copper Plating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Gold Plating, Silver Plating.

C10100 vs C82200 — frequently asked

Is C82200 stronger than C10100?

Yes. C82200 has a typical yield strength of 415 MPa (60.2 ksi) against 69 MPa (10 ksi) for C10100 — about 6.0 times as much. Tensile strength is 620 MPa (89.9 ksi) vs 235 MPa (34.1 ksi).

Which is cheaper, C10100 or C82200?

C82200 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the high tier ($$$$) while C10100 is specialty ($$$$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, C10100 or C82200?

C82200, by a small margin. Both rate poor for machinability — 30/100 against 18/100 for C10100; for welding the order is C10100 first (very good, 70/100) then C82200 (fair, 50/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in C10100 and C82200 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.