FabDigitFabDigit

Copper Alloy C10100 vs C82100

Copper Alloy · grade comparison

Copper Alloy C10100 and C82100 are both copper alloy grades. C82100 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 515 MPa (74.7 ksi) against 69 MPa (10 ksi) for C10100, about 7.5 times as much; tensile strength follows at 655 MPa (95 ksi) vs 235 MPa (34.1 ksi). In exchange, C10100 is the more ductile: elongation 45% versus 6% for C82100, and C82100 is harder (200 HB vs 45 HB). C82100 is stiffer (131 GPa vs 117 GPa) and C10100 conducts heat better (391 W/m·K vs 208 W/m·K). On the shop floor, C82100 machines more easily (fair vs poor), C10100 welds better (very good vs fair), and C82100 sits in a lower cost tier (high, $$$$) than C10100 (specialty, $$$$$).

C10100Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when it will be welded.

C82100Choose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is machined in volume.

C10100 vs C82100: properties

C10100C82100

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

117 GPa17 Msi
131 GPa19 Msi

Shear Modulus

44 GPa6.4 Msi
50 GPa7.3 Msi

Bulk Modulus

140 GPa20.3 Msi
125 GPa18.1 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.34
0.3

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

235 MPa34.1 ksi
655 MPa95 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

69 MPa10 ksi
515 MPa74.7 ksi

Elongation at Break

45%
6%

Reduction in Area

75%
—

Shear Strength

152 MPa22 ksi
415 MPa60.2 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

76 MPa11 ksi
190 MPa27.6 ksi

Hardness, Brinell

45 HB
200 HB

Hardness, Vickers

50 HV
210 HV

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

—
8 J5.9 ft·lbf

Hardness, Rockwell B

—
96 HRB

Hardness, Rockwell C

—
20 HRC

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

8.94 g/cm³0.32 lb/in³
8.75 g/cm³0.32 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

1,083°C1,981 °F
1,030°C1,886 °F

Liquidus Temperature

1,083°C1,981 °F
1,090°C1,994 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

391 W/m·K226 BTU/hr·ft·°F
208 W/m·K120 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

385 J/kg·K0.09 BTU/lb·°F
419 J/kg·K0.1 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

17.7 µm/m·K9.8 µin/in·°F
17.8 µm/m·K9.9 µin/in·°F

Min Service Temperature

-253°C-423 °F
-200°C-328 °F

Same in both: Latent Heat of Fusion 205 J/g88.1 BTU/lb · Max Service Temperature (continuous) 200°C392 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

101 % IACS
45 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

1.71×10⁻⁸ Ω·m0.672 µΩ·in
3.83×10⁻⁸ Ω·m1.51 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.24 V
-0.2 V

Corrosion Resistance

58 / 100
65 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

18 / 100
35 / 100

Weldability

70 / 100
45 / 100

Formability (cold)

95 / 100
15 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

95 / 100
55 / 100

Polishability

85 / 100
75 / 100

Castability

—
80 / 100

Same in both: Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %) 20%

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

60 MJ/kg25,795 BTU/lb
95 MJ/kg40,843 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

3.8 kg CO₂/kg
6.5 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

250 L/kg30 gal/lb
350 L/kg41.9 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

5%
35%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

26 kN·m/kg
75 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

13.1 MN·m/kg
15 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

20 kJ/m³
1,012 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

113.6 mm²/s
56.7 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

44
58

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every copper alloy grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

501002005001,0007.588.599.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleC10100C82100

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityC10100C82100
CNC machiningYes—
Sheet metalYes—
Default conditionO—
Relative cost$$$$$ Specialty$$$$ High
Min. machined wall0.8 mm—
Best machined surfaceRa 1.6 µm—
Chrome PlatingYes—
ElectropolishingYes—
Nickel PlatingYes—
PaintingYes—
Tin PlatingYes—

They share 4 finishes: Copper Plating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Gold Plating, Silver Plating.

C10100 vs C82100 — frequently asked

Is C82100 stronger than C10100?

Yes. C82100 has a typical yield strength of 515 MPa (74.7 ksi) against 69 MPa (10 ksi) for C10100 — about 7.5 times as much. Tensile strength is 655 MPa (95 ksi) vs 235 MPa (34.1 ksi).

Which is cheaper, C10100 or C82100?

C82100 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the high tier ($$$$) while C10100 is specialty ($$$$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, C10100 or C82100?

C82100. Its machinability rates fair (35/100) against poor (18/100) for C10100; for welding the order is C10100 first (very good, 70/100) then C82100 (fair, 45/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in C10100 and C82100 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.