FabDigitFabDigit

Copper Alloy BCu-2 vs ERCuSn-A

Copper Alloy · grade comparison

Copper Alloy BCu-2 and ERCuSn-A are both copper alloy grades. ERCuSn-A is the stronger of the two: yield strength 165 MPa (23.9 ksi) against 65 MPa (9.43 ksi) for BCu-2, about 154% more; tensile strength follows at 330 MPa (47.9 ksi) vs 200 MPa (29 ksi). ERCuSn-A is harder — 80 HB against 45 HB for BCu-2 — which matters for wear surfaces and threads. BCu-2 runs hotter in service (350°C vs 200°C continuous) and BCu-2 conducts heat better (346 W/m·K vs 69 W/m·K). On the shop floor, ERCuSn-A welds better (good vs fair) and BCu-2 forms better (excellent vs very good).

BCu-2Choose it when the part sees heat.

ERCuSn-AChoose it when strength drives the design, or when surface hardness matters.

BCu-2 vs ERCuSn-A: properties

BCu-2ERCuSn-A

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

115 GPa16.7 Msi
110 GPa16 Msi

Shear Modulus

44 GPa6.4 Msi
41 GPa5.9 Msi

Bulk Modulus

140 GPa20.3 Msi
115 GPa16.7 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

200 MPa29 ksi
330 MPa47.9 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

65 MPa9.4 ksi
165 MPa23.9 ksi

Reduction in Area

45%
—

Compressive Strength

220 MPa31.9 ksi
320 MPa46.4 ksi

Shear Strength

145 MPa21 ksi
230 MPa33.4 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

65 MPa9.4 ksi
130 MPa18.9 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

90 MPa·√m81.9 ksi·√in
—

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

75 J55.3 ft·lbf
45 J33.2 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

45 HB
80 HB

Hardness, Vickers

48 HV
—

Hardness, Rockwell B

—
45 HRB

Same in both: Poisson's Ratio 0.34 · Elongation at Break 35%

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

8.92 g/cm³0.32 lb/in³
8.8 g/cm³0.32 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

1,083°C1,981 °F
950°C1,742 °F

Liquidus Temperature

1,083°C1,981 °F
1,050°C1,922 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

346 W/m·K200 BTU/hr·ft·°F
69 W/m·K39.9 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

385 J/kg·K0.09 BTU/lb·°F
380 J/kg·K0.09 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

17.6 µm/m·K9.8 µin/in·°F
17.8 µm/m·K9.9 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

205 J/g88.1 BTU/lb
200 J/g86 BTU/lb

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

350°C662 °F
200°C392 °F

Same in both: Min Service Temperature -196°C-321 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

90 % IACS
15 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

1.9×10⁻⁸ Ω·m0.748 µΩ·in
1.15×10⁻⁷ Ω·m4.53 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

58 / 100
72 / 100

Same in both: Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE) -0.28 V

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

25 / 100
30 / 100

Weldability

45 / 100
60 / 100

Formability (cold)

90 / 100
80 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

95 / 100
80 / 100

Polishability

70 / 100
75 / 100

Same in both: Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %) 20% · Castability 55 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

50 MJ/kg21,496 BTU/lb
62 MJ/kg26,655 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

3.8 kg CO₂/kg
4.2 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

250 L/kg30 gal/lb
320 L/kg38.3 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

30%
35%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

22 kN·m/kg
38 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

12.9 MN·m/kg
12.5 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

18 kJ/m³
124 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

100.8 mm²/s
20.6 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

34
12

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every copper alloy grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

501002005001,0007.588.599.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleERCuSn-ABCu-2

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityBCu-2ERCuSn-A
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$$ High$$$$ High
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

Both take the same 4 finishes: Copper Plating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Gold Plating, Silver Plating.

BCu-2 vs ERCuSn-A — frequently asked

Is ERCuSn-A stronger than BCu-2?

Yes. ERCuSn-A has a typical yield strength of 165 MPa (23.9 ksi) against 65 MPa (9.43 ksi) for BCu-2 — about 154% more. Tensile strength is 330 MPa (47.9 ksi) vs 200 MPa (29 ksi).

Which is cheaper, BCu-2 or ERCuSn-A?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$$, high); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, BCu-2 or ERCuSn-A?

ERCuSn-A, by a small margin. Both rate poor for machinability — 30/100 against 25/100 for BCu-2; for welding the order is ERCuSn-A first (good, 60/100) then BCu-2 (fair, 45/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in BCu-2 and ERCuSn-A side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.