FabDigitFabDigit

Phenolic LE vs Phenolic XX

Composite · grade comparison

Phenolic LE and Phenolic XX are both composite grades. Phenolic LE is the stronger of the two: tensile strength 105 MPa (15.2 ksi) against 90 MPa (13.1 ksi) for Phenolic XX, about 17% more. Phenolic LE conducts heat better (0.3 W/m·K vs 0.25 W/m·K).

Phenolic LEChoose it when strength drives the design.

Phenolic LE vs Phenolic XX: properties

Phenolic LEPhenolic XX

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Shear Modulus

2.5 GPa0.36 Msi
2.7 GPa0.39 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.25
0.28

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

105 MPa15.2 ksi
90 MPa13.1 ksi

Compressive Strength

275 MPa39.9 ksi
240 MPa34.8 ksi

Compressive Modulus

7.5 GPa1.1 Msi
7 GPa1 Msi

Flexural Strength

145 MPa21 ksi
124 MPa18 ksi

Flexural Modulus

7.5 GPa1.1 Msi
8 GPa1.2 Msi

Shear Strength

90 MPa13.1 ksi
83 MPa12 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

3.5 MPa·√m3.2 ksi·√in
—

Izod Impact, Notched

80 J/m1.5 ft·lbf/in
27 J/m0.51 ft·lbf/in

Same in both: Elastic (Young's) Modulus 7 GPa1 Msi · Elongation at Break 1.5% · Hardness, Shore D 90 Shore D · Hardness, Rockwell M 105 HRM · Hardness, Rockwell R 125 HRR

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

1.36 g/cm³0.05 lb/in³
1.34 g/cm³0.05 lb/in³

Glass Transition (Tg)

150°C302 °F
170°C338 °F

Water Absorption (24 h)

1.5%
1.3%

Water Absorption (Saturation)

3%
4%

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

0.3 W/m·K0.17 BTU/hr·ft·°F
0.25 W/m·K0.14 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

1,400 J/kg·K0.33 BTU/lb·°F
1,300 J/kg·K0.31 BTU/lb·°F

Min Service Temperature

-60°C-76 °F
-50°C-58 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 1.8 MPa

170°C338 °F
150°C302 °F

Limiting Oxygen Index

28%
32%

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 0.45 MPa

—
175°C347 °F

Same in both: Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C) 25 µm/m·K13.9 µin/in·°F · Max Service Temperature (continuous) 120°C248 °F · Max Service Temperature (short-term) 150°C302 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Dielectric Constant (1 MHz)

5.5
5

Dissipation Factor (1 MHz)

0.05
0.04

Volume Resistivity

1×10¹² Ω·cm
1×10¹¹ Ω·cm

Comparative Tracking Index (CTI)

—
125 V

Same in both: Electrical Resistivity 1×10⁹ Ω·m3.94×10¹⁶ µΩ·in · Dielectric Strength 15 kV/mm381 V/mil · Surface Resistivity 1×10¹¹ Ω

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

UV / Weathering Resistance

40 / 100
25 / 100

Same in both: Corrosion Resistance 65 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

78 / 100
80 / 100

Formability (cold)

10 / 100
15 / 100

Polishability

40 / 100
35 / 100

Same in both: Weldability 0 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

85 MJ/kg36,543 BTU/lb
80 MJ/kg34,394 BTU/lb

Embodied Water

350 L/kg41.9 gal/lb
—

Typical Recycled Content

0%
5%

Same in both: Embodied Carbon (primary production) 4.5 kg CO₂/kg

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

77 kN·m/kg
67 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

5.1 MN·m/kg
5.2 MN·m/kg

Thermal Diffusivity

0.2 mm²/s
0.1 mm²/s

Same in both: Thermal Shock Resistance Index 0

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every composite grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

1101001,000510Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scalePhenolic LEPhenolic XX

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityPhenolic LEPhenolic XX
Default conditionPhenolic MatrixPhenolic Matrix
Relative cost$$$ Premium$$$ Premium
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

Both are offered for CNC machining and Sheet metal. Both take the same 1 finish: Painting.

Phenolic LE vs Phenolic XX — frequently asked

Is Phenolic LE stronger than Phenolic XX?

Yes. Phenolic LE has a typical tensile strength of 105 MPa (15.2 ksi) against 90 MPa (13.1 ksi) for Phenolic XX — about 17% more.

Which is cheaper, Phenolic LE or Phenolic XX?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$, premium); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

When should I choose Phenolic LE over Phenolic XX?

Pick Phenolic LE when strength drives the design.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in Phenolic LE and Phenolic XX side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.