FabDigitFabDigit

Ox/Ox vs ZrB2-SiC

Composite · grade comparison

Ox/Ox and ZrB2-SiC are both composite grades. ZrB2-SiC is the stronger of the two: tensile strength 320 MPa (46.4 ksi) against 190 MPa (27.6 ksi) for Ox/Ox, about 68% more. Ox/Ox is lighter (2.75 g/cm³ vs 5.5 g/cm³ for ZrB2-SiC) and ZrB2-SiC is stiffer (490 GPa vs 75 GPa).

Ox/OxChoose it when weight is the constraint.

ZrB2-SiCChoose it when strength drives the design, or when the part sees heat.

Ox/Ox vs ZrB2-SiC: properties

Ox/OxZrB2-SiC

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

75 GPa10.9 Msi
490 GPa71.1 Msi

Shear Modulus

25 GPa3.6 Msi
213 GPa30.9 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.12
0.14

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

190 MPa27.6 ksi
320 MPa46.4 ksi

Elongation at Break

0.3%
—

Compressive Strength

200 MPa29 ksi
2,500 MPa363 ksi

Compressive Modulus

70 GPa10.2 Msi
—

Flexural Strength

250 MPa36.3 ksi
700 MPa102 ksi

Flexural Modulus

65 GPa9.4 Msi
485 GPa70.3 Msi

Shear Strength

10 MPa1.5 ksi
—

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

8 MPa·√m7.3 ksi·√in
4.5 MPa·√m4.1 ksi·√in

Bulk Modulus

—
227 GPa32.9 Msi

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

2.75 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³
5.5 g/cm³0.2 lb/in³

Water Absorption (Saturation)

8%
—

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

2 W/m·K1.2 BTU/hr·ft·°F
78 W/m·K45.1 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

1,000 J/kg·K0.24 BTU/lb·°F
440 J/kg·K0.11 BTU/lb·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

1,200°C2,192 °F
1,600°C2,912 °F

Max Service Temperature (short-term)

1,300°C2,372 °F
2,200°C3,992 °F

Same in both: Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C) 6 µm/m·K3.3 µin/in·°F · Min Service Temperature -200°C-328 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Resistivity

1×10¹⁰ Ω·m3.94×10¹⁷ µΩ·in
1.5×10⁻⁷ Ω·m5.91 µΩ·in

Dielectric Constant (1 MHz)

5
—

Dissipation Factor (1 MHz)

0.008
—

Volume Resistivity

—
1.5×10⁻⁵ Ω·cm

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

92 / 100
75 / 100

Same in both: UV / Weathering Resistance 100 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

15 / 100
8 / 100

Polishability

25 / 100
80 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

600 MJ/kg257,954 BTU/lb
300 MJ/kg128,977 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

45 kg CO₂/kg
22 kg CO₂/kg

Same in both: Typical Recycled Content 0%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

69 kN·m/kg
58 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

27.3 MN·m/kg
89.1 MN·m/kg

Thermal Diffusivity

0.7 mm²/s
32.2 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

1
8

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every composite grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

1101001,000510Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityOx/OxZrB2-SiC
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$$ High$$$$ High
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

Ox/Ox vs ZrB2-SiC — frequently asked

Is ZrB2-SiC stronger than Ox/Ox?

Yes. ZrB2-SiC has a typical tensile strength of 320 MPa (46.4 ksi) against 190 MPa (27.6 ksi) for Ox/Ox — about 68% more.

Which is cheaper, Ox/Ox or ZrB2-SiC?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$$, high); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, Ox/Ox or ZrB2-SiC?

Ox/Ox. Its machinability rates poor (15/100) against not recommended (8/100) for ZrB2-SiC.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in Ox/Ox and ZrB2-SiC side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.