FabDigitFabDigit

LAS/SiC vs Ox/Ox

Composite · grade comparison

LAS/SiC and Ox/Ox are both composite grades. LAS/SiC is the stronger of the two: tensile strength 260 MPa (37.7 ksi) against 190 MPa (27.6 ksi) for Ox/Ox, about 37% more. LAS/SiC is the more ductile: elongation 0.7% versus 0.3% for Ox/Ox. LAS/SiC is lighter (2.5 g/cm³ vs 2.75 g/cm³ for Ox/Ox) and LAS/SiC is stiffer (110 GPa vs 75 GPa).

LAS/SiCChoose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

Ox/OxChoose it when the part sees heat.

LAS/SiC vs Ox/Ox: properties

LAS/SiCOx/Ox

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

110 GPa16 Msi
75 GPa10.9 Msi

Shear Modulus

42 GPa6.1 Msi
25 GPa3.6 Msi

Bulk Modulus

70 GPa10.2 Msi
—

Poisson's Ratio

0.22
0.12

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

260 MPa37.7 ksi
190 MPa27.6 ksi

Elongation at Break

0.7%
0.3%

Compressive Strength

800 MPa116 ksi
200 MPa29 ksi

Compressive Modulus

110 GPa16 Msi
70 GPa10.2 Msi

Flexural Strength

400 MPa58 ksi
250 MPa36.3 ksi

Flexural Modulus

105 GPa15.2 Msi
65 GPa9.4 Msi

Shear Strength

45 MPa6.5 ksi
10 MPa1.5 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

15 MPa·√m13.7 ksi·√in
8 MPa·√m7.3 ksi·√in

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

2.5 g/cm³0.09 lb/in³
2.75 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³

Water Absorption (24 h)

0.3%
—

Water Absorption (Saturation)

—
8%

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

2.5 W/m·K1.4 BTU/hr·ft·°F
2 W/m·K1.2 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

900 J/kg·K0.21 BTU/lb·°F
1,000 J/kg·K0.24 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

3 µm/m·K1.7 µin/in·°F
6 µm/m·K3.3 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

900°C1,652 °F
1,200°C2,192 °F

Max Service Temperature (short-term)

1,200°C2,192 °F
1,300°C2,372 °F

Same in both: Min Service Temperature -200°C-328 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Resistivity

1 Ω·m3.94×10⁷ µΩ·in
1×10¹⁰ Ω·m3.94×10¹⁷ µΩ·in

Dielectric Constant (1 MHz)

—
5

Dissipation Factor (1 MHz)

—
0.008

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

78 / 100
92 / 100

UV / Weathering Resistance

98 / 100
100 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

8 / 100
15 / 100

Polishability

45 / 100
25 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

320 MJ/kg137,575 BTU/lb
600 MJ/kg257,954 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

26 kg CO₂/kg
45 kg CO₂/kg

Same in both: Typical Recycled Content 0%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

104 kN·m/kg
69 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

44 MN·m/kg
27.3 MN·m/kg

Thermal Diffusivity

1.1 mm²/s
0.7 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

2
1

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every composite grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

1101001,000510Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityLAS/SiCOx/Ox
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$$ High$$$$ High
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

LAS/SiC vs Ox/Ox — frequently asked

Is LAS/SiC stronger than Ox/Ox?

Yes. LAS/SiC has a typical tensile strength of 260 MPa (37.7 ksi) against 190 MPa (27.6 ksi) for Ox/Ox — about 37% more.

Which is cheaper, LAS/SiC or Ox/Ox?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$$, high); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, LAS/SiC or Ox/Ox?

Ox/Ox. Its machinability rates poor (15/100) against not recommended (8/100) for LAS/SiC.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in LAS/SiC and Ox/Ox side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.