FabDigitFabDigit

A359/SiC/20p vs Cu-Graphite

Composite · grade comparison

A359/SiC/20p and Cu-Graphite are both composite grades. A359/SiC/20p is the stronger of the two: yield strength 310 MPa (45 ksi) against 80 MPa (11.6 ksi) for Cu-Graphite, about 3.9 times as much; tensile strength follows at 340 MPa (49.3 ksi) vs 110 MPa (16 ksi). In exchange, Cu-Graphite is the more ductile: elongation 2% versus 0.5% for A359/SiC/20p. A359/SiC/20p is lighter (2.77 g/cm³ vs 6.4 g/cm³ for Cu-Graphite) and A359/SiC/20p is stiffer (98.6 GPa vs 75 GPa). On the shop floor, Cu-Graphite machines more easily (very good vs not recommended).

A359/SiC/20pChoose it when strength drives the design, or when weight is the constraint.

Cu-GraphiteChoose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part sees heat.

A359/SiC/20p vs Cu-Graphite: properties

A359/SiC/20pCu-Graphite

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

98.6 GPa14.3 Msi
75 GPa10.9 Msi

Shear Modulus

38 GPa5.5 Msi
28 GPa4.1 Msi

Bulk Modulus

82 GPa11.9 Msi
68 GPa9.9 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.32
0.31

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

340 MPa49.3 ksi
110 MPa16 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

310 MPa45 ksi
80 MPa11.6 ksi

Elongation at Break

0.5%
2%

Compressive Strength

480 MPa69.6 ksi
230 MPa33.4 ksi

Compressive Modulus

99 GPa14.4 Msi
—

Flexural Strength

480 MPa69.6 ksi
130 MPa18.9 ksi

Flexural Modulus

98 GPa14.2 Msi
—

Shear Strength

210 MPa30.5 ksi
85 MPa12.3 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

15 MPa·√m13.7 ksi·√in
—

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

2.77 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³
6.4 g/cm³0.23 lb/in³

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

180 W/m·K104 BTU/hr·ft·°F
170 W/m·K98.2 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

840 J/kg·K0.2 BTU/lb·°F
420 J/kg·K0.1 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

17.5 µm/m·K9.7 µin/in·°F
13.5 µm/m·K7.5 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

200°C392 °F
300°C572 °F

Min Service Temperature

-196°C-321 °F
-100°C-148 °F

Max Service Temperature (short-term)

300°C572 °F
450°C842 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Resistivity

6×10⁻⁸ Ω·m2.36 µΩ·in
4×10⁻⁸ Ω·m1.57 µΩ·in

Volume Resistivity

—
4×10⁻⁶ Ω·cm

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

45 / 100
35 / 100

Same in both: UV / Weathering Resistance 95 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

12 / 100
80 / 100

Polishability

45 / 100
30 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

190 MJ/kg81,685 BTU/lb
62 MJ/kg26,655 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

13 kg CO₂/kg
4.2 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

1,100 L/kg132 gal/lb
260 L/kg31.2 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

15%
30%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

123 kN·m/kg
17 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

35.6 MN·m/kg
11.7 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

487 kJ/m³
43 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

77.4 mm²/s
63.2 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

35
18

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every composite grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

1101001,000510Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleA359/SiC/20pCu-Graphite

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityA359/SiC/20pCu-Graphite
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$$ High$$$$ High
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

A359/SiC/20p vs Cu-Graphite — frequently asked

Is A359/SiC/20p stronger than Cu-Graphite?

Yes. A359/SiC/20p has a typical yield strength of 310 MPa (45 ksi) against 80 MPa (11.6 ksi) for Cu-Graphite — about 3.9 times as much. Tensile strength is 340 MPa (49.3 ksi) vs 110 MPa (16 ksi).

Which is cheaper, A359/SiC/20p or Cu-Graphite?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$$, high); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, A359/SiC/20p or Cu-Graphite?

Cu-Graphite. Its machinability rates very good (80/100) against not recommended (12/100) for A359/SiC/20p.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in A359/SiC/20p and Cu-Graphite side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.