FabDigitFabDigit

2124/SiC/25p vs Cu-Graphite

Composite · grade comparison

2124/SiC/25p and Cu-Graphite are both composite grades. 2124/SiC/25p is the stronger of the two: yield strength 480 MPa (69.6 ksi) against 80 MPa (11.6 ksi) for Cu-Graphite, about 6.0 times as much; tensile strength follows at 620 MPa (89.9 ksi) vs 110 MPa (16 ksi). 2124/SiC/25p is the more ductile: elongation 3% versus 2% for Cu-Graphite. 2124/SiC/25p is lighter (2.88 g/cm³ vs 6.4 g/cm³ for Cu-Graphite) and 2124/SiC/25p is stiffer (114 GPa vs 75 GPa). On the shop floor, Cu-Graphite machines more easily (very good vs not recommended).

2124/SiC/25pChoose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

Cu-GraphiteChoose it when the part sees heat, or when the part is machined in volume.

2124/SiC/25p vs Cu-Graphite: properties

2124/SiC/25pCu-Graphite

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

114 GPa16.5 Msi
75 GPa10.9 Msi

Shear Modulus

45 GPa6.5 Msi
28 GPa4.1 Msi

Bulk Modulus

90 GPa13.1 Msi
68 GPa9.9 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.29
0.31

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

620 MPa89.9 ksi
110 MPa16 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

480 MPa69.6 ksi
80 MPa11.6 ksi

Elongation at Break

3%
2%

Compressive Strength

700 MPa102 ksi
230 MPa33.4 ksi

Compressive Modulus

116 GPa16.8 Msi
—

Flexural Strength

800 MPa116 ksi
130 MPa18.9 ksi

Flexural Modulus

114 GPa16.5 Msi
—

Shear Strength

340 MPa49.3 ksi
85 MPa12.3 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

15 MPa·√m13.7 ksi·√in
—

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

2.88 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³
6.4 g/cm³0.23 lb/in³

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

140 W/m·K80.9 BTU/hr·ft·°F
170 W/m·K98.2 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

830 J/kg·K0.2 BTU/lb·°F
420 J/kg·K0.1 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

15 µm/m·K8.3 µin/in·°F
13.5 µm/m·K7.5 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

175°C347 °F
300°C572 °F

Min Service Temperature

-196°C-321 °F
-100°C-148 °F

Max Service Temperature (short-term)

300°C572 °F
450°C842 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Resistivity

6.5×10⁻⁸ Ω·m2.56 µΩ·in
4×10⁻⁸ Ω·m1.57 µΩ·in

Volume Resistivity

—
4×10⁻⁶ Ω·cm

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

32 / 100
35 / 100

Same in both: UV / Weathering Resistance 95 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

12 / 100
80 / 100

Polishability

45 / 100
30 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

260 MJ/kg111,780 BTU/lb
62 MJ/kg26,655 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

18 kg CO₂/kg
4.2 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

1,200 L/kg144 gal/lb
260 L/kg31.2 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

0%
30%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

215 kN·m/kg
17 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

39.6 MN·m/kg
11.7 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

1,011 kJ/m³
43 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

58.6 mm²/s
63.2 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

51
18

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every composite grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

1101001,000510Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale2124/SiC/25pCu-Graphite

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability2124/SiC/25pCu-Graphite
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$$ High$$$$ High
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

2124/SiC/25p vs Cu-Graphite — frequently asked

Is 2124/SiC/25p stronger than Cu-Graphite?

Yes. 2124/SiC/25p has a typical yield strength of 480 MPa (69.6 ksi) against 80 MPa (11.6 ksi) for Cu-Graphite — about 6.0 times as much. Tensile strength is 620 MPa (89.9 ksi) vs 110 MPa (16 ksi).

Which is cheaper, 2124/SiC/25p or Cu-Graphite?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$$, high); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, 2124/SiC/25p or Cu-Graphite?

Cu-Graphite. Its machinability rates very good (80/100) against not recommended (12/100) for 2124/SiC/25p.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 2124/SiC/25p and Cu-Graphite side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.