FabDigitFabDigit

Glassy Carbon vs RVC

Ceramic · grade comparison

Glassy Carbon and RVC are both ceramic grades. Glassy Carbon is the stronger of the two: tensile strength 130 MPa (18.9 ksi) against 0.42 MPa (0.0609 ksi) for RVC, about 310 times as much. Glassy Carbon is the more ductile: elongation 0.4% versus 0.3% for RVC. RVC is lighter (0.05 g/cm³ vs 1.42 g/cm³ for Glassy Carbon) and Glassy Carbon is stiffer (35 GPa vs 0.11 GPa). On the shop floor, RVC machines more easily (fair vs not recommended).

Glassy CarbonChoose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

RVCChoose it when weight is the constraint, or when the part is machined in volume.

Glassy Carbon vs RVC: properties

Glassy CarbonRVC

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

35 GPa5.1 Msi
0.11 GPa0.02 Msi

Shear Modulus

14.5 GPa2.1 Msi
—

Bulk Modulus

19 GPa2.8 Msi
—

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

130 MPa18.9 ksi
0.42 MPa0.06 ksi

Elongation at Break

0.4%
0.3%

Compressive Strength

480 MPa69.6 ksi
0.95 MPa0.14 ksi

Flexural Strength

260 MPa37.7 ksi
0.65 MPa0.09 ksi

Shear Strength

60 MPa8.7 ksi
0.25 MPa0.04 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

0.8 MPa·√m0.73 ksi·√in
—

Hardness, Vickers

340 HV
—

Hardness, Knoop

320 HK
—

Hardness, Mohs

6.5
—

Same in both: Poisson's Ratio 0.2

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

1.42 g/cm³0.05 lb/in³
0.05 g/cm³0 lb/in³

Porosity

0%
97%

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

6.3 W/m·K3.6 BTU/hr·ft·°F
0.06 W/m·K0.03 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

600°C1,112 °F
400°C752 °F

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 710 J/kg·K0.17 BTU/lb·°F · Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C) 2.6 µm/m·K1.4 µin/in·°F · Min Service Temperature -269°C-452 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Resistivity

4.5×10⁻⁵ Ω·m1,772 µΩ·in
0.005 Ω·m196,850 µΩ·in

Volume Resistivity

0 Ω·cm
0.5 Ω·cm

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

95 / 100
90 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

12 / 100
35 / 100

Polishability

95 / 100
—

Sintering / Firing Temperature

2,300°C4,172 °F
1,200°C2,192 °F

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

300 MJ/kg128,977 BTU/lb
260 MJ/kg111,780 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

22 kg CO₂/kg
20 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

150 L/kg18 gal/lb
—

Same in both: Typical Recycled Content 0%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

92 kN·m/kg
9 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

24.6 MN·m/kg
2.3 MN·m/kg

Thermal Diffusivity

6.2 mm²/s
1.6 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

9
0

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every ceramic grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

501002005001,000234567Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityGlassy CarbonRVC
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$$ High$$$$ High
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

Glassy Carbon vs RVC — frequently asked

Is Glassy Carbon stronger than RVC?

Yes. Glassy Carbon has a typical tensile strength of 130 MPa (18.9 ksi) against 0.42 MPa (0.0609 ksi) for RVC — about 310 times as much.

Which is cheaper, Glassy Carbon or RVC?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$$, high); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, Glassy Carbon or RVC?

RVC. Its machinability rates fair (35/100) against not recommended (12/100) for Glassy Carbon.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in Glassy Carbon and RVC side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.