FabDigitFabDigit

Aluminum AlSi10Mg vs EN AC-43400

Aluminum · grade comparison

Aluminum AlSi10Mg and EN AC-43400 are both aluminum grades. AlSi10Mg is the stronger of the two: yield strength 265 MPa (38.4 ksi) against 155 MPa (22.5 ksi) for EN AC-43400, about 71% more; tensile strength follows at 460 MPa (66.7 ksi) vs 260 MPa (37.7 ksi). AlSi10Mg is the more ductile: elongation 7% versus 2% for EN AC-43400, and AlSi10Mg is harder (119 HB vs 75 HB). EN AC-43400 conducts electricity better (27 % IACS vs 24 % IACS). On the shop floor, EN AC-43400 machines more easily (good vs fair), AlSi10Mg welds better (good vs fair), and EN AC-43400 sits in a lower cost tier (standard, $$) than AlSi10Mg (premium, $$$).

AlSi10MgChoose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

EN AC-43400Choose it when the part is machined in volume, or when cost is the deciding factor.

AlSi10Mg vs EN AC-43400: properties

AlSi10MgEN AC-43400

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

70 GPa10.2 Msi
73 GPa10.6 Msi

Shear Modulus

26.5 GPa3.8 Msi
27 GPa3.9 Msi

Bulk Modulus

69 GPa10 Msi
71 GPa10.3 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

460 MPa66.7 ksi
260 MPa37.7 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

265 MPa38.4 ksi
155 MPa22.5 ksi

Elongation at Break

7%
2%

Compressive Strength

480 MPa69.6 ksi
160 MPa23.2 ksi

Shear Strength

280 MPa40.6 ksi
175 MPa25.4 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

22 MPa·√m20 ksi·√in
17 MPa·√m15.5 ksi·√in

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

4 J2.6 ft·lbf
3 J2.2 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

119 HB
75 HB

Hardness, Rockwell B

66 HRB
—

Hardness, Vickers

125 HV
85 HV

Same in both: Poisson's Ratio 0.33 · Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit) 90 MPa13.1 ksi

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

2.67 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³
2.66 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³

Same in both: Melting Point (Solidus) 557°C1,035 °F · Liquidus Temperature 596°C1,105 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

120 W/m·K69.3 BTU/hr·ft·°F
130 W/m·K75.1 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

425 J/g183 BTU/lb
490 J/g211 BTU/lb

Min Service Temperature

-196°C-321 °F
-50°C-58 °F

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 900 J/kg·K0.21 BTU/lb·°F · Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C) 21 µm/m·K11.7 µin/in·°F · Max Service Temperature (continuous) 150°C302 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

24 % IACS
27 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

7.2×10⁻⁸ Ω·m2.83 µΩ·in
6.4×10⁻⁸ Ω·m2.52 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Same in both: Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE) -0.83 V · Corrosion Resistance 55 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

50 / 100
65 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

50%
—

Weldability

60 / 100
35 / 100

Formability (cold)

10 / 100
—

Castability

92 / 100
95 / 100

Polishability

55 / 100
45 / 100

Same in both: Brazeability / Solderability 30 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

240 MJ/kg103,182 BTU/lb
200 MJ/kg85,985 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

15 kg CO₂/kg
12 kg CO₂/kg

Typical Recycled Content

5%
85%

Same in both: Embodied Water 1,200 L/kg144 gal/lb

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

172 kN·m/kg
98 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

26.2 MN·m/kg
27.4 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

502 kJ/m³
165 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

49.9 mm²/s
54.3 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

38
22

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every aluminum grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

20501002005002.22.42.62.83Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleEN AC-43400AlSi10Mg

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityAlSi10MgEN AC-43400
3D printingYes—
Default conditionAs Printed—
Relative cost$$$ Premium$$ Standard
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——
Anodized (Aluminum AM)Yes—
Plated (Metal AM)Yes—

They share 4 finishes: Electroless Nickel (EN), Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Silver Plating.

AlSi10Mg vs EN AC-43400 — frequently asked

Is AlSi10Mg stronger than EN AC-43400?

Yes. AlSi10Mg has a typical yield strength of 265 MPa (38.4 ksi) against 155 MPa (22.5 ksi) for EN AC-43400 — about 71% more. Tensile strength is 460 MPa (66.7 ksi) vs 260 MPa (37.7 ksi).

Which is cheaper, AlSi10Mg or EN AC-43400?

EN AC-43400 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the standard tier ($$) while AlSi10Mg is premium ($$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, AlSi10Mg or EN AC-43400?

EN AC-43400. Its machinability rates good (65/100) against fair (50/100) for AlSi10Mg; for welding the order is AlSi10Mg first (good, 60/100) then EN AC-43400 (fair, 35/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in AlSi10Mg and EN AC-43400 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.