FabDigitFabDigit

Aluminum AC2A vs ADC5

Aluminum · grade comparison

Aluminum AC2A and ADC5 are both aluminum grades. ADC5 is the stronger of the two: tensile strength 300 MPa (43.5 ksi) against 250 MPa (36.3 ksi) for AC2A, about 20% more. ADC5 is the more ductile: elongation 8% versus 2% for AC2A, and AC2A is harder (85 HB vs 70 HB). ADC5 is lighter (2.58 g/cm³ vs 2.79 g/cm³ for AC2A) and AC2A is stiffer (74 GPa vs 70 GPa). On the shop floor, ADC5 welds better (50 vs 35 out of 100).

AC2AChoose it when the part sees heat.

ADC5Choose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

AC2A vs ADC5: properties

AC2AADC5

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

74 GPa10.7 Msi
70 GPa10.2 Msi

Shear Modulus

27.5 GPa4 Msi
26 GPa3.8 Msi

Bulk Modulus

72 GPa10.4 Msi
69 GPa10 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

250 MPa36.3 ksi
300 MPa43.5 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

170 MPa24.7 ksi
175 MPa25.4 ksi

Elongation at Break

2%
8%

Shear Strength

165 MPa23.9 ksi
195 MPa28.3 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

75 MPa10.9 ksi
138 MPa20 ksi

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

3 J2.2 ft·lbf
8 J5.9 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

85 HB
70 HB

Same in both: Poisson's Ratio 0.33 · Fracture Toughness (K_IC) 18 MPa·√m16.4 ksi·√in

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

2.79 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³
2.58 g/cm³0.09 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

516°C961 °F
535°C995 °F

Liquidus Temperature

604°C1,119 °F
620°C1,148 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

110 W/m·K63.6 BTU/hr·ft·°F
96 W/m·K55.5 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

963 J/kg·K0.23 BTU/lb·°F
960 J/kg·K0.23 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

21.5 µm/m·K11.9 µin/in·°F
24.1 µm/m·K13.4 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

389 J/g167 BTU/lb
390 J/g168 BTU/lb

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

175°C347 °F
120°C248 °F

Same in both: Min Service Temperature -196°C-321 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

27 % IACS
24 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

6.4×10⁻⁸ Ω·m2.52 µΩ·in
7.2×10⁻⁸ Ω·m2.83 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.75 V
-0.87 V

Corrosion Resistance

42 / 100
72 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

72 / 100
80 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

70%
180%

Weldability

35 / 100
50 / 100

Formability (cold)

10 / 100
20 / 100

Castability

75 / 100
38 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

25 / 100
20 / 100

Polishability

40 / 100
75 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Water

1,150 L/kg138 gal/lb
1,100 L/kg132 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

80%
50%

Same in both: Embodied Energy (primary production) 200 MJ/kg85,985 BTU/lb · Embodied Carbon (primary production) 12 kg CO₂/kg

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

90 kN·m/kg
116 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

26.5 MN·m/kg
27.1 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

195 kJ/m³
219 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

40.9 mm²/s
38.8 mm²/s

Same in both: Thermal Shock Resistance Index 17

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every aluminum grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

20501002005002.22.42.62.83Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleAC2AADC5

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityAC2AADC5
Default condition——
Relative cost$$ Standard$$ Standard
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

Both take the same 4 finishes: Electroless Nickel (EN), Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Silver Plating.

AC2A vs ADC5 — frequently asked

Is ADC5 stronger than AC2A?

Yes. ADC5 has a typical tensile strength of 300 MPa (43.5 ksi) against 250 MPa (36.3 ksi) for AC2A — about 20% more.

Which is cheaper, AC2A or ADC5?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$, standard); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, AC2A or ADC5?

ADC5, by a small margin. Both rate very good for machinability — 80/100 against 72/100 for AC2A; for welding the order is ADC5 first (fair, 50/100) then AC2A (fair, 35/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in AC2A and ADC5 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.