FabDigitFabDigit

Aluminum AC2A vs ADC14

Aluminum · grade comparison

Aluminum AC2A and ADC14 are both aluminum grades. ADC14 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 240 MPa (34.8 ksi) against 170 MPa (24.7 ksi) for AC2A, about 41% more; tensile strength follows at 280 MPa (40.6 ksi) vs 250 MPa (36.3 ksi). In exchange, AC2A is the more ductile: elongation 2% versus 1% for ADC14, and ADC14 is harder (120 HB vs 85 HB). ADC14 is stiffer (81 GPa vs 74 GPa) and ADC14 runs hotter in service (200°C vs 175°C continuous). On the shop floor, AC2A machines more easily (very good vs poor) and AC2A welds better (fair vs poor).

AC2AChoose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part is machined in volume.

ADC14Choose it when strength drives the design, or when the part sees heat.

AC2A vs ADC14: properties

AC2AADC14

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

74 GPa10.7 Msi
81 GPa11.7 Msi

Shear Modulus

27.5 GPa4 Msi
31 GPa4.5 Msi

Bulk Modulus

72 GPa10.4 Msi
77 GPa11.2 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

250 MPa36.3 ksi
280 MPa40.6 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

170 MPa24.7 ksi
240 MPa34.8 ksi

Elongation at Break

2%
1%

Shear Strength

165 MPa23.9 ksi
190 MPa27.6 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

75 MPa10.9 ksi
110 MPa16 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

18 MPa·√m16.4 ksi·√in
12 MPa·√m10.9 ksi·√in

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

3 J2.2 ft·lbf
2 J1.1 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

85 HB
120 HB

Compressive Strength

—
400 MPa58 ksi

Same in both: Poisson's Ratio 0.33

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

2.79 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³
2.73 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

516°C961 °F
507°C945 °F

Liquidus Temperature

604°C1,119 °F
650°C1,202 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

110 W/m·K63.6 BTU/hr·ft·°F
134 W/m·K77.4 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

963 J/kg·K0.23 BTU/lb·°F
880 J/kg·K0.21 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

21.5 µm/m·K11.9 µin/in·°F
18 µm/m·K10 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

389 J/g167 BTU/lb
450 J/g193 BTU/lb

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

175°C347 °F
200°C392 °F

Min Service Temperature

-196°C-321 °F
-80°C-112 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Same in both: Electrical Conductivity 27 % IACS · Electrical Resistivity 6.4×10⁻⁸ Ω·m2.52 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.75 V
-0.78 V

Same in both: Corrosion Resistance 42 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

72 / 100
30 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

70%
45%

Weldability

35 / 100
20 / 100

Formability (cold)

10 / 100
3 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

25 / 100
20 / 100

Same in both: Castability 75 / 100 · Polishability 40 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Water

1,150 L/kg138 gal/lb
1,100 L/kg132 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

80%
85%

Same in both: Embodied Energy (primary production) 200 MJ/kg85,985 BTU/lb · Embodied Carbon (primary production) 12 kg CO₂/kg

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

90 kN·m/kg
103 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

26.5 MN·m/kg
29.7 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

195 kJ/m³
356 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

40.9 mm²/s
55.8 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

17
26

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every aluminum grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

20501002005002.22.42.62.83Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleAC2AADC14

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityAC2AADC14
Default condition——
Relative cost$$ Standard$$ Standard
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

Both take the same 4 finishes: Electroless Nickel (EN), Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Silver Plating.

AC2A vs ADC14 — frequently asked

Is ADC14 stronger than AC2A?

Yes. ADC14 has a typical yield strength of 240 MPa (34.8 ksi) against 170 MPa (24.7 ksi) for AC2A — about 41% more. Tensile strength is 280 MPa (40.6 ksi) vs 250 MPa (36.3 ksi).

Which is cheaper, AC2A or ADC14?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$, standard); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, AC2A or ADC14?

AC2A. Its machinability rates very good (72/100) against poor (30/100) for ADC14; for welding the order is AC2A first (fair, 35/100) then ADC14 (poor, 20/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in AC2A and ADC14 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.