FabDigitFabDigit

Aluminum 8006 vs Sintered 6061

Aluminum · grade comparison

Aluminum 8006 and Sintered 6061 are both aluminum grades. Sintered 6061 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 193 MPa (28 ksi) against 130 MPa (18.9 ksi) for 8006, about 48% more; tensile strength follows at 200 MPa (29 ksi) vs 155 MPa (22.5 ksi). In exchange, 8006 is the more ductile: elongation 10% versus 1% for Sintered 6061, and Sintered 6061 is harder (70 HB vs 45 HB). Sintered 6061 is lighter (2.55 g/cm³ vs 2.71 g/cm³ for 8006) and 8006 is stiffer (69 GPa vs 60 GPa). On the shop floor, Sintered 6061 machines more easily (very good vs fair), 8006 welds better (very good vs poor), and 8006 sits in a lower cost tier (budget, $) than Sintered 6061 (high, $$$$).

8006Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when it will be welded.

Sintered 6061Choose it when strength drives the design, or when weight is the constraint.

8006 vs Sintered 6061: properties

8006Sintered 6061

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

69 GPa10 Msi
60 GPa8.7 Msi

Shear Modulus

26 GPa3.8 Msi
22 GPa3.2 Msi

Bulk Modulus

70 GPa10.2 Msi
58 GPa8.4 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.33
0.31

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

155 MPa22.5 ksi
200 MPa29 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

130 MPa18.9 ksi
193 MPa28 ksi

Elongation at Break

10%
1%

Shear Strength

95 MPa13.8 ksi
135 MPa19.6 ksi

Hardness, Brinell

45 HB
70 HB

Compressive Strength

—
210 MPa30.5 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

—
18 MPa·√m16.4 ksi·√in

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

—
3 J2.2 ft·lbf

Same in both: Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit) 55 MPa8 ksi

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

2.71 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³
2.55 g/cm³0.09 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

630°C1,166 °F
582°C1,080 °F

Liquidus Temperature

655°C1,211 °F
652°C1,206 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

185 W/m·K107 BTU/hr·ft·°F
150 W/m·K86.7 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

900 J/kg·K0.21 BTU/lb·°F
896 J/kg·K0.21 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

23.6 µm/m·K13.1 µin/in·°F
23.4 µm/m·K13 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

390 J/g168 BTU/lb
395 J/g170 BTU/lb

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

120°C248 °F
150°C302 °F

Same in both: Min Service Temperature -196°C-321 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

47 % IACS
38 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

3.7×10⁻⁸ Ω·m1.46 µΩ·in
4.5×10⁻⁸ Ω·m1.77 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.78 V
-0.76 V

Corrosion Resistance

62 / 100
55 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

35 / 100
80 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

30%
190%

Weldability

70 / 100
30 / 100

Formability (cold)

78 / 100
15 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

70 / 100
35 / 100

Polishability

40 / 100
45 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

200 MJ/kg85,985 BTU/lb
225 MJ/kg96,733 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

12 kg CO₂/kg
14 kg CO₂/kg

Typical Recycled Content

35%
25%

Same in both: Embodied Water 1,150 L/kg138 gal/lb

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

57 kN·m/kg
78 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

25.5 MN·m/kg
23.5 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

122 kJ/m³
310 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

75.9 mm²/s
65.7 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

18
21

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every aluminum grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

20501002005002.22.42.62.83Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale8006Sintered 6061

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability8006Sintered 6061
Sheet metalYes—
Default condition——
Relative cost$ Budget$$$$ High
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——
Anodizing Type IIYes—
CerakoteYes—
Chem Film (Alodine)Yes—
E-CoatingYes—
ElectropolishingYes—
Hard Anodize Type III w/ PTFEYes—
Hard Anodizing Type IIIYes—
Nickel PlatingYes—
PTFE CoatingYes—
PaintingYes—
Powder CoatingYes—

They share 4 finishes: Electroless Nickel (EN), Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Silver Plating.

8006 vs Sintered 6061 — frequently asked

Is Sintered 6061 stronger than 8006?

Yes. Sintered 6061 has a typical yield strength of 193 MPa (28 ksi) against 130 MPa (18.9 ksi) for 8006 — about 48% more. Tensile strength is 200 MPa (29 ksi) vs 155 MPa (22.5 ksi).

Which is cheaper, 8006 or Sintered 6061?

8006 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the budget tier ($) while Sintered 6061 is high ($$$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, 8006 or Sintered 6061?

Sintered 6061. Its machinability rates very good (80/100) against fair (35/100) for 8006; for welding the order is 8006 first (very good, 70/100) then Sintered 6061 (poor, 30/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 8006 and Sintered 6061 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.