FabDigitFabDigit

Aluminum 8006 vs 8090

Aluminum · grade comparison

Aluminum 8006 and 8090 are both aluminum grades. 8090 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 425 MPa (61.6 ksi) against 130 MPa (18.9 ksi) for 8006, about 3.3 times as much; tensile strength follows at 480 MPa (69.6 ksi) vs 155 MPa (22.5 ksi). In exchange, 8006 is the more ductile: elongation 10% versus 6% for 8090, and 8090 is harder (135 HB vs 45 HB). 8090 is lighter (2.54 g/cm³ vs 2.71 g/cm³ for 8006) and 8090 is stiffer (78 GPa vs 69 GPa). On the shop floor, 8090 machines more easily (good vs fair), 8006 welds better (very good vs poor), and 8006 sits in a lower cost tier (budget, $) than 8090 (high, $$$$).

8006Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when it will be welded.

8090Choose it when strength drives the design, or when weight is the constraint.

8006 vs 8090: properties

80068090

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

69 GPa10 Msi
78 GPa11.3 Msi

Shear Modulus

26 GPa3.8 Msi
29 GPa4.2 Msi

Bulk Modulus

70 GPa10.2 Msi
76 GPa11 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.33
0.34

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

155 MPa22.5 ksi
480 MPa69.6 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

130 MPa18.9 ksi
425 MPa61.6 ksi

Elongation at Break

10%
6%

Shear Strength

95 MPa13.8 ksi
290 MPa42.1 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

55 MPa8 ksi
155 MPa22.5 ksi

Hardness, Brinell

45 HB
135 HB

Compressive Strength

—
440 MPa63.8 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

—
32 MPa·√m29.1 ksi·√in

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

2.71 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³
2.54 g/cm³0.09 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

630°C1,166 °F
600°C1,112 °F

Same in both: Liquidus Temperature 655°C1,211 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

185 W/m·K107 BTU/hr·ft·°F
93 W/m·K53.7 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

900 J/kg·K0.21 BTU/lb·°F
930 J/kg·K0.22 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

23.6 µm/m·K13.1 µin/in·°F
21.4 µm/m·K11.9 µin/in·°F

Min Service Temperature

-196°C-321 °F
-253°C-423 °F

Same in both: Latent Heat of Fusion 390 J/g168 BTU/lb · Max Service Temperature (continuous) 120°C248 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

47 % IACS
23 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

3.7×10⁻⁸ Ω·m1.46 µΩ·in
7.5×10⁻⁸ Ω·m2.95 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.78 V
-0.8 V

Corrosion Resistance

62 / 100
40 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

35 / 100
55 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

30%
45%

Weldability

70 / 100
25 / 100

Formability (cold)

78 / 100
20 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

70 / 100
15 / 100

Polishability

40 / 100
55 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

200 MJ/kg85,985 BTU/lb
220 MJ/kg94,583 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

12 kg CO₂/kg
14 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

1,150 L/kg138 gal/lb
1,200 L/kg144 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

35%
5%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

57 kN·m/kg
189 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

25.5 MN·m/kg
30.7 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

122 kJ/m³
1,158 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

75.9 mm²/s
39.4 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

18
27

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every aluminum grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

20501002005002.22.42.62.83Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale80068090

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability80068090
CNC machining—Yes
Default condition—T851
Relative cost$ Budget$$$$ High
Min. machined wall—0.5 mm
Best machined surface—Ra 0.8 µm
DLC—Yes

Both are offered for Sheet metal. They share 15 finishes: Anodizing Type II, Cerakote, Chem Film (Alodine), E-Coating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Electropolishing, Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Hard Anodize Type III w/ PTFE, Hard Anodizing Type III, Nickel Plating, PTFE Coating and 3 more.

8006 vs 8090 — frequently asked

Is 8090 stronger than 8006?

Yes. 8090 has a typical yield strength of 425 MPa (61.6 ksi) against 130 MPa (18.9 ksi) for 8006 — about 3.3 times as much. Tensile strength is 480 MPa (69.6 ksi) vs 155 MPa (22.5 ksi).

Which is cheaper, 8006 or 8090?

8006 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the budget tier ($) while 8090 is high ($$$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, 8006 or 8090?

8090. Its machinability rates good (55/100) against fair (35/100) for 8006; for welding the order is 8006 first (very good, 70/100) then 8090 (poor, 25/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 8006 and 8090 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.