FabDigitFabDigit

Aluminum 7072 vs V95

Aluminum · grade comparison

Aluminum 7072 and V95 are both aluminum grades. V95 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 470 MPa (68.2 ksi) against 21 MPa (3.05 ksi) for 7072, about 22 times as much; tensile strength follows at 545 MPa (79 ksi) vs 55 MPa (7.98 ksi). In exchange, 7072 is the more ductile: elongation 32% versus 8% for V95, and V95 is harder (150 HB vs 20 HB). 7072 is lighter (2.72 g/cm³ vs 2.85 g/cm³ for V95) and 7072 runs hotter in service (150°C vs 120°C continuous). On the shop floor, V95 machines more easily (very good vs poor), 7072 welds better (very good vs poor), and 7072 sits in a lower cost tier (budget, $) than V95 (premium, $$$).

7072Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when weight is the constraint.

V95Choose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is machined in volume.

7072 vs V95: properties

7072V95

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

69 GPa10 Msi
71 GPa10.3 Msi

Shear Modulus

26 GPa3.8 Msi
27 GPa3.9 Msi

Bulk Modulus

69 GPa10 Msi
70 GPa10.2 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

55 MPa8 ksi
545 MPa79 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

21 MPa3 ksi
470 MPa68.2 ksi

Elongation at Break

32%
8%

Shear Strength

41 MPa5.9 ksi
330 MPa47.9 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

30 MPa4.4 ksi
155 MPa22.5 ksi

Hardness, Brinell

20 HB
150 HB

Reduction in Area

—
25%

Compressive Strength

—
480 MPa69.6 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

—
26 MPa·√m23.7 ksi·√in

Hardness, Rockwell B

—
87 HRB

Hardness, Vickers

—
160 HV

Same in both: Poisson's Ratio 0.33

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

2.72 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³
2.85 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

640°C1,184 °F
477°C891 °F

Liquidus Temperature

657°C1,215 °F
635°C1,175 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

227 W/m·K131 BTU/hr·ft·°F
130 W/m·K75.1 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

900 J/kg·K0.21 BTU/lb·°F
880 J/kg·K0.21 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

23.6 µm/m·K13.1 µin/in·°F
23.2 µm/m·K12.9 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

395 J/g170 BTU/lb
390 J/g168 BTU/lb

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

150°C302 °F
120°C248 °F

Same in both: Min Service Temperature -196°C-321 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

60 % IACS
33 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

2.87×10⁻⁸ Ω·m1.13 µΩ·in
5.2×10⁻⁸ Ω·m2.05 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.96 V
-0.83 V

Corrosion Resistance

72 / 100
35 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

30 / 100
75 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

30%
70%

Weldability

80 / 100
20 / 100

Formability (cold)

95 / 100
25 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

80 / 100
15 / 100

Polishability

45 / 100
60 / 100

Castability

—
20 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

200 MJ/kg85,985 BTU/lb
210 MJ/kg90,284 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

13 kg CO₂/kg
12.5 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

1,200 L/kg144 gal/lb
1,100 L/kg132 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

20%
25%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

20 kN·m/kg
191 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

25.4 MN·m/kg
24.9 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

3 kJ/m³
1,556 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

92.7 mm²/s
51.8 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

8
43

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every aluminum grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

20501002005002.22.42.62.83Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale7072V95

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability7072V95
Sheet metalYes—
Default condition——
Relative cost$ Budget$$$ Premium
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——
Anodizing Type IIYes—
CerakoteYes—
Chem Film (Alodine)Yes—
E-CoatingYes—
ElectropolishingYes—
Hard Anodize Type III w/ PTFEYes—
Hard Anodizing Type IIIYes—
Nickel PlatingYes—
PTFE CoatingYes—
PaintingYes—
Powder CoatingYes—

They share 4 finishes: Electroless Nickel (EN), Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Silver Plating.

7072 vs V95 — frequently asked

Is V95 stronger than 7072?

Yes. V95 has a typical yield strength of 470 MPa (68.2 ksi) against 21 MPa (3.05 ksi) for 7072 — about 22 times as much. Tensile strength is 545 MPa (79 ksi) vs 55 MPa (7.98 ksi).

Which is cheaper, 7072 or V95?

7072 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the budget tier ($) while V95 is premium ($$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, 7072 or V95?

V95. Its machinability rates very good (75/100) against poor (30/100) for 7072; for welding the order is 7072 first (very good, 80/100) then V95 (poor, 20/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 7072 and V95 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.