FabDigitFabDigit

Aluminum 7072 vs 7095

Aluminum · grade comparison

Aluminum 7072 and 7095 are both aluminum grades. 7095 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 675 MPa (97.9 ksi) against 21 MPa (3.05 ksi) for 7072, about 32 times as much; tensile strength follows at 710 MPa (103 ksi) vs 55 MPa (7.98 ksi). In exchange, 7072 is the more ductile: elongation 32% versus 10% for 7095, and 7095 is harder (190 HB vs 20 HB). 7072 is lighter (2.72 g/cm³ vs 2.86 g/cm³ for 7095) and 7072 runs hotter in service (150°C vs 120°C continuous). On the shop floor, 7095 machines more easily (very good vs poor), 7072 welds better (very good vs poor), and 7072 sits in a lower cost tier (budget, $) than 7095 (high, $$$$).

7072Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when weight is the constraint.

7095Choose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is machined in volume.

7072 vs 7095: properties

70727095

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

69 GPa10 Msi
71.5 GPa10.4 Msi

Shear Modulus

26 GPa3.8 Msi
27 GPa3.9 Msi

Bulk Modulus

69 GPa10 Msi
74 GPa10.7 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

55 MPa8 ksi
710 MPa103 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

21 MPa3 ksi
675 MPa97.9 ksi

Elongation at Break

32%
10%

Shear Strength

41 MPa5.9 ksi
400 MPa58 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

30 MPa4.4 ksi
170 MPa24.7 ksi

Hardness, Brinell

20 HB
190 HB

Reduction in Area

—
20%

Compressive Strength

—
690 MPa100 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

—
30 MPa·√m27.3 ksi·√in

Hardness, Vickers

—
205 HV

Same in both: Poisson's Ratio 0.33

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

2.72 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³
2.86 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

640°C1,184 °F
470°C878 °F

Liquidus Temperature

657°C1,215 °F
630°C1,166 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

227 W/m·K131 BTU/hr·ft·°F
135 W/m·K78 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

900 J/kg·K0.21 BTU/lb·°F
870 J/kg·K0.21 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

23.6 µm/m·K13.1 µin/in·°F
23.4 µm/m·K13 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

395 J/g170 BTU/lb
385 J/g166 BTU/lb

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

150°C302 °F
120°C248 °F

Same in both: Min Service Temperature -196°C-321 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

60 % IACS
31 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

2.87×10⁻⁸ Ω·m1.13 µΩ·in
5.6×10⁻⁸ Ω·m2.2 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.96 V
-0.84 V

Corrosion Resistance

72 / 100
35 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

30 / 100
70 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

30%
70%

Weldability

80 / 100
15 / 100

Formability (cold)

95 / 100
20 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

80 / 100
10 / 100

Polishability

45 / 100
60 / 100

Castability

—
20 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

200 MJ/kg85,985 BTU/lb
215 MJ/kg92,433 BTU/lb

Embodied Water

1,200 L/kg144 gal/lb
1,150 L/kg138 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

20%
5%

Same in both: Embodied Carbon (primary production) 13 kg CO₂/kg

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

20 kN·m/kg
248 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

25.4 MN·m/kg
25 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

3 kJ/m³
3,186 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

92.7 mm²/s
54.3 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

8
57

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every aluminum grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

20501002005002.22.42.62.83Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale70727095

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability70727095
Sheet metalYes—
Default condition——
Relative cost$ Budget$$$$ High
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——
Anodizing Type IIYes—
CerakoteYes—
Chem Film (Alodine)Yes—
E-CoatingYes—
ElectropolishingYes—
Hard Anodize Type III w/ PTFEYes—
Hard Anodizing Type IIIYes—
Nickel PlatingYes—
PTFE CoatingYes—
PaintingYes—
Powder CoatingYes—

They share 4 finishes: Electroless Nickel (EN), Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Silver Plating.

7072 vs 7095 — frequently asked

Is 7095 stronger than 7072?

Yes. 7095 has a typical yield strength of 675 MPa (97.9 ksi) against 21 MPa (3.05 ksi) for 7072 — about 32 times as much. Tensile strength is 710 MPa (103 ksi) vs 55 MPa (7.98 ksi).

Which is cheaper, 7072 or 7095?

7072 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the budget tier ($) while 7095 is high ($$$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, 7072 or 7095?

7095. Its machinability rates very good (70/100) against poor (30/100) for 7072; for welding the order is 7072 first (very good, 80/100) then 7095 (poor, 15/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 7072 and 7095 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.